Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Clinical Oral Implants Research |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , |
| In: | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28, 2017, 9, S. 1038-1045 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Bertl, Kristina Grotthoff, Verena Schulze Bertl, Michael H. Heimel, Patrick Gahleitner, André Ulm, Christian Stavropoulos, Andreas Bertl, Kristina Grotthoff, Verena Schulze Bertl, Michael H. Heimel, Patrick Gahleitner, André Ulm, Christian Stavropoulos, Andreas |
|---|---|
| author |
Bertl, Kristina Grotthoff, Verena Schulze Bertl, Michael H. Heimel, Patrick Gahleitner, André Ulm, Christian Stavropoulos, Andreas |
| spellingShingle |
Bertl, Kristina Grotthoff, Verena Schulze Bertl, Michael H. Heimel, Patrick Gahleitner, André Ulm, Christian Stavropoulos, Andreas Clinical Oral Implants Research A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge Oral Surgery |
| author_sort |
bertl, kristina |
| spelling |
Bertl, Kristina Grotthoff, Verena Schulze Bertl, Michael H. Heimel, Patrick Gahleitner, André Ulm, Christian Stavropoulos, Andreas 0905-7161 1600-0501 Wiley Oral Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12915 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate (i) a possible correlation between the mesio‐distal gap width and the alveolar ridge (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>) dimensions in patients missing the maxillary lateral incisor (I2) either due to agenesis or loss and (ii) the possibility of straightforward implant placement based on simulation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The bucco‐palatal width, area, and height of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at the position of I2, and the mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and the canine, were assessed in maxillary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans of three groups: Patients with (i) agenesis of I2 (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 40); (ii) I2 regularly erupted but extracted (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 24); (iii) I2 regularly erupted and <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> (C; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 40). Further, the possibility of straightforward placement of an implant 3 or 3.5 mm in diameter ×10 mm in length, with 1 mm distance from the buccal and palatal plate of the alveolar ridge was simulated and compared to the actual treatment delivered.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Bucco‐palatal width and area of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at I2 and the adjacent teeth was significantly reduced in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> compared to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> and C. Further, in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, but not <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, an increasing mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and canine resulted in a significantly reduced bucco‐palatal width of the edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>. This impeded a simulated straightforward implant placement in >50% of the cases in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, even with a reduced implant diameter.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>In patients congenitally missing I2, an increased mesio‐distal gap width correlates significantly with reduced edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> dimensions. A mesio‐distal gap of >6 mm was associated with thin bucco‐palatal alveolar ridges, precluding straightforward implant placement in 60–80% of the cases.</jats:p></jats:sec> A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge Clinical Oral Implants Research |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/clr.12915 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9jbHIuMTI5MTU |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9jbHIuMTI5MTU |
| institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2017 |
| issn |
1600-0501 0905-7161 |
| issn_str_mv |
1600-0501 0905-7161 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
bertl2017awidemesiodistalgapinsitesofcongenitallymissingmaxillarylateralincisorsisrelatedtoathinalveolarridge |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Clinical Oral Implants Research |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_unstemmed |
A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_full |
A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_fullStr |
A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_short |
A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_sort |
a wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| topic |
Oral Surgery |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12915 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| physical |
1038-1045 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate (i) a possible correlation between the mesio‐distal gap width and the alveolar ridge (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>) dimensions in patients missing the maxillary lateral incisor (I2) either due to agenesis or loss and (ii) the possibility of straightforward implant placement based on simulation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The bucco‐palatal width, area, and height of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at the position of I2, and the mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and the canine, were assessed in maxillary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans of three groups: Patients with (i) agenesis of I2 (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 40); (ii) I2 regularly erupted but extracted (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 24); (iii) I2 regularly erupted and <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> (C; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 40). Further, the possibility of straightforward placement of an implant 3 or 3.5 mm in diameter ×10 mm in length, with 1 mm distance from the buccal and palatal plate of the alveolar ridge was simulated and compared to the actual treatment delivered.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Bucco‐palatal width and area of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at I2 and the adjacent teeth was significantly reduced in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> compared to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> and C. Further, in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, but not <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, an increasing mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and canine resulted in a significantly reduced bucco‐palatal width of the edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>. This impeded a simulated straightforward implant placement in >50% of the cases in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, even with a reduced implant diameter.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>In patients congenitally missing I2, an increased mesio‐distal gap width correlates significantly with reduced edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> dimensions. A mesio‐distal gap of >6 mm was associated with thin bucco‐palatal alveolar ridges, precluding straightforward implant placement in 60–80% of the cases.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
9 |
| container_start_page |
1038 |
| container_title |
Clinical Oral Implants Research |
| container_volume |
28 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792343637022998537 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:54:52.737Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=A+wide+mesio%E2%80%90distal+gap+in+sites+of+congenitally+missing+maxillary+lateral+incisors+is+related+to+a+thin+alveolar+ridge&rft.date=2017-09-01&genre=article&issn=1600-0501&volume=28&issue=9&spage=1038&epage=1045&pages=1038-1045&jtitle=Clinical+Oral+Implants+Research&atitle=A+wide+mesio%E2%80%90distal+gap+in+sites+of+congenitally+missing+maxillary+lateral+incisors+is+related+to+a+thin+alveolar+ridge&aulast=Stavropoulos&aufirst=Andreas&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fclr.12915&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792343637022998537 |
| author | Bertl, Kristina, Grotthoff, Verena Schulze, Bertl, Michael H., Heimel, Patrick, Gahleitner, André, Ulm, Christian, Stavropoulos, Andreas |
| author_facet | Bertl, Kristina, Grotthoff, Verena Schulze, Bertl, Michael H., Heimel, Patrick, Gahleitner, André, Ulm, Christian, Stavropoulos, Andreas, Bertl, Kristina, Grotthoff, Verena Schulze, Bertl, Michael H., Heimel, Patrick, Gahleitner, André, Ulm, Christian, Stavropoulos, Andreas |
| author_sort | bertl, kristina |
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1038 |
| container_title | Clinical Oral Implants Research |
| container_volume | 28 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate (i) a possible correlation between the mesio‐distal gap width and the alveolar ridge (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>) dimensions in patients missing the maxillary lateral incisor (I2) either due to agenesis or loss and (ii) the possibility of straightforward implant placement based on simulation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The bucco‐palatal width, area, and height of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at the position of I2, and the mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and the canine, were assessed in maxillary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans of three groups: Patients with (i) agenesis of I2 (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 40); (ii) I2 regularly erupted but extracted (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 24); (iii) I2 regularly erupted and <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> (C; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 40). Further, the possibility of straightforward placement of an implant 3 or 3.5 mm in diameter ×10 mm in length, with 1 mm distance from the buccal and palatal plate of the alveolar ridge was simulated and compared to the actual treatment delivered.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Bucco‐palatal width and area of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at I2 and the adjacent teeth was significantly reduced in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> compared to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> and C. Further, in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, but not <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, an increasing mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and canine resulted in a significantly reduced bucco‐palatal width of the edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>. This impeded a simulated straightforward implant placement in >50% of the cases in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, even with a reduced implant diameter.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>In patients congenitally missing I2, an increased mesio‐distal gap width correlates significantly with reduced edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> dimensions. A mesio‐distal gap of >6 mm was associated with thin bucco‐palatal alveolar ridges, precluding straightforward implant placement in 60–80% of the cases.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.12915 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9jbHIuMTI5MTU |
| imprint | Wiley, 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2017 |
| institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 1600-0501, 0905-7161 |
| issn_str_mv | 1600-0501, 0905-7161 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:54:52.737Z |
| match_str | bertl2017awidemesiodistalgapinsitesofcongenitallymissingmaxillarylateralincisorsisrelatedtoathinalveolarridge |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 1038-1045 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Clinical Oral Implants Research |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Bertl, Kristina Grotthoff, Verena Schulze Bertl, Michael H. Heimel, Patrick Gahleitner, André Ulm, Christian Stavropoulos, Andreas 0905-7161 1600-0501 Wiley Oral Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12915 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate (i) a possible correlation between the mesio‐distal gap width and the alveolar ridge (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>) dimensions in patients missing the maxillary lateral incisor (I2) either due to agenesis or loss and (ii) the possibility of straightforward implant placement based on simulation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The bucco‐palatal width, area, and height of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at the position of I2, and the mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and the canine, were assessed in maxillary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans of three groups: Patients with (i) agenesis of I2 (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 40); (ii) I2 regularly erupted but extracted (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>;<jats:italic> n</jats:italic> = 24); (iii) I2 regularly erupted and <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> (C; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 40). Further, the possibility of straightforward placement of an implant 3 or 3.5 mm in diameter ×10 mm in length, with 1 mm distance from the buccal and palatal plate of the alveolar ridge was simulated and compared to the actual treatment delivered.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Bucco‐palatal width and area of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> at I2 and the adjacent teeth was significantly reduced in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> compared to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> and C. Further, in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, but not <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>L</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, an increasing mesio‐distal gap width between the central incisor and canine resulted in a significantly reduced bucco‐palatal width of the edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content>. This impeded a simulated straightforward implant placement in >50% of the cases in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>A</jats:sub></jats:styled-content>, even with a reduced implant diameter.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>In patients congenitally missing I2, an increased mesio‐distal gap width correlates significantly with reduced edentulous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AR</jats:styled-content> dimensions. A mesio‐distal gap of >6 mm was associated with thin bucco‐palatal alveolar ridges, precluding straightforward implant placement in 60–80% of the cases.</jats:p></jats:sec> A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge Clinical Oral Implants Research |
| spellingShingle | Bertl, Kristina, Grotthoff, Verena Schulze, Bertl, Michael H., Heimel, Patrick, Gahleitner, André, Ulm, Christian, Stavropoulos, Andreas, Clinical Oral Implants Research, A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge, Oral Surgery |
| title | A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_full | A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_fullStr | A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_full_unstemmed | A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_short | A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_sort | a wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| title_unstemmed | A wide mesio‐distal gap in sites of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is related to a thin alveolar ridge |
| topic | Oral Surgery |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12915 |