author_facet Menassa, Melanie
de Grandmont, Pierre
Audy, Nicholas
Durand, Robert
Rompré, Pierre
Emami, Elham
Menassa, Melanie
de Grandmont, Pierre
Audy, Nicholas
Durand, Robert
Rompré, Pierre
Emami, Elham
author Menassa, Melanie
de Grandmont, Pierre
Audy, Nicholas
Durand, Robert
Rompré, Pierre
Emami, Elham
spellingShingle Menassa, Melanie
de Grandmont, Pierre
Audy, Nicholas
Durand, Robert
Rompré, Pierre
Emami, Elham
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
Oral Surgery
author_sort menassa, melanie
spelling Menassa, Melanie de Grandmont, Pierre Audy, Nicholas Durand, Robert Rompré, Pierre Emami, Elham 0905-7161 1600-0501 Wiley Oral Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12515 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To examine patients’ expectations, the level of satisfaction, and the oral health‐related quality of life (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL) with regard to the implants’ immediate loading protocol (ILP) in edentate individuals.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This pilot trial used a pre–post design to assess patient‐centered outcomes in 18 edentate individuals (mean age 62.4 ± 7.7 years) who have received a 2‐implant (unsplinted) mandibular overdenture through an ILP. Visual analog scales, the McGill denture satisfaction questionnaire, and the oral health impact profile (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content>‐20) questionnaire were used to evaluate patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 4 months after surgery. Personality trait and socio‐demographic information were obtained using the revised <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">NEO</jats:styled-content> personality inventory and a self‐administered questionnaire, respectively. Non‐parametric methods and Brunner–Langer approach were used to analyze the data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The participants had a wide range of expectations regarding the ILP. Expectations included short‐term positive impact on aesthetics (83.3%) and social life (55.7%), as well as negative effects on comfort (5.6%), the ability to chew (11.1%), and the ability to clean the lower denture (11.1%). The ILP satisfied 94.4% of the participants, regardless of socio‐demographic and personality profiles. There was a statistically significant improvement in overall satisfaction, comfort, perceived aesthetics, stability of the overdenture, and ability to chew from baseline to 2‐week, 1‐, and 4‐month follow‐up (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p><jats:p>There was a statistically significant decrease in the total <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content> scores and all its domains (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) from baseline to 2 weeks. These differences remained statistically significant at 4‐month follow‐up. The ILP improved patients’ <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, regardless of the implant loss, the socio‐demographic characteristics, and personality traits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The ILP of two unsplinted implants with a mandibular overdenture significantly improved satisfaction and short‐term <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, and appears to meet expectations in edentulous elders. There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p></jats:sec> Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol Clinical Oral Implants Research
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.12515
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9jbHIuMTI1MTU
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9jbHIuMTI1MTU
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2016
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2016
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
issn_str_mv 0905-7161
1600-0501
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str menassa2016patientsexpectationssatisfactionandqualityoflifewithimmediateloadingprotocol
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Clinical Oral Implants Research
source_id 49
title Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_unstemmed Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_full Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_fullStr Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_short Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_sort patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
topic Oral Surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12515
publishDate 2016
physical 83-89
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To examine patients’ expectations, the level of satisfaction, and the oral health‐related quality of life (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL) with regard to the implants’ immediate loading protocol (ILP) in edentate individuals.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This pilot trial used a pre–post design to assess patient‐centered outcomes in 18 edentate individuals (mean age 62.4 ± 7.7 years) who have received a 2‐implant (unsplinted) mandibular overdenture through an ILP. Visual analog scales, the McGill denture satisfaction questionnaire, and the oral health impact profile (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content>‐20) questionnaire were used to evaluate patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 4 months after surgery. Personality trait and socio‐demographic information were obtained using the revised <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">NEO</jats:styled-content> personality inventory and a self‐administered questionnaire, respectively. Non‐parametric methods and Brunner–Langer approach were used to analyze the data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The participants had a wide range of expectations regarding the ILP. Expectations included short‐term positive impact on aesthetics (83.3%) and social life (55.7%), as well as negative effects on comfort (5.6%), the ability to chew (11.1%), and the ability to clean the lower denture (11.1%). The ILP satisfied 94.4% of the participants, regardless of socio‐demographic and personality profiles. There was a statistically significant improvement in overall satisfaction, comfort, perceived aesthetics, stability of the overdenture, and ability to chew from baseline to 2‐week, 1‐, and 4‐month follow‐up (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p><jats:p>There was a statistically significant decrease in the total <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content> scores and all its domains (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) from baseline to 2 weeks. These differences remained statistically significant at 4‐month follow‐up. The ILP improved patients’ <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, regardless of the implant loss, the socio‐demographic characteristics, and personality traits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The ILP of two unsplinted implants with a mandibular overdenture significantly improved satisfaction and short‐term <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, and appears to meet expectations in edentulous elders. There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title Clinical Oral Implants Research
container_volume 27
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792344254140383239
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:04:11.36Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Patients%E2%80%99+expectations%2C+satisfaction%2C+and+quality+of+life+with+immediate+loading+protocol&rft.date=2016-01-01&genre=article&issn=1600-0501&volume=27&issue=1&spage=83&epage=89&pages=83-89&jtitle=Clinical+Oral+Implants+Research&atitle=Patients%E2%80%99+expectations%2C+satisfaction%2C+and+quality+of+life+with+immediate+loading+protocol&aulast=Emami&aufirst=Elham&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fclr.12515&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792344254140383239
author Menassa, Melanie, de Grandmont, Pierre, Audy, Nicholas, Durand, Robert, Rompré, Pierre, Emami, Elham
author_facet Menassa, Melanie, de Grandmont, Pierre, Audy, Nicholas, Durand, Robert, Rompré, Pierre, Emami, Elham, Menassa, Melanie, de Grandmont, Pierre, Audy, Nicholas, Durand, Robert, Rompré, Pierre, Emami, Elham
author_sort menassa, melanie
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title Clinical Oral Implants Research
container_volume 27
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To examine patients’ expectations, the level of satisfaction, and the oral health‐related quality of life (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL) with regard to the implants’ immediate loading protocol (ILP) in edentate individuals.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This pilot trial used a pre–post design to assess patient‐centered outcomes in 18 edentate individuals (mean age 62.4 ± 7.7 years) who have received a 2‐implant (unsplinted) mandibular overdenture through an ILP. Visual analog scales, the McGill denture satisfaction questionnaire, and the oral health impact profile (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content>‐20) questionnaire were used to evaluate patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 4 months after surgery. Personality trait and socio‐demographic information were obtained using the revised <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">NEO</jats:styled-content> personality inventory and a self‐administered questionnaire, respectively. Non‐parametric methods and Brunner–Langer approach were used to analyze the data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The participants had a wide range of expectations regarding the ILP. Expectations included short‐term positive impact on aesthetics (83.3%) and social life (55.7%), as well as negative effects on comfort (5.6%), the ability to chew (11.1%), and the ability to clean the lower denture (11.1%). The ILP satisfied 94.4% of the participants, regardless of socio‐demographic and personality profiles. There was a statistically significant improvement in overall satisfaction, comfort, perceived aesthetics, stability of the overdenture, and ability to chew from baseline to 2‐week, 1‐, and 4‐month follow‐up (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p><jats:p>There was a statistically significant decrease in the total <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content> scores and all its domains (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) from baseline to 2 weeks. These differences remained statistically significant at 4‐month follow‐up. The ILP improved patients’ <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, regardless of the implant loss, the socio‐demographic characteristics, and personality traits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The ILP of two unsplinted implants with a mandibular overdenture significantly improved satisfaction and short‐term <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, and appears to meet expectations in edentulous elders. There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.12515
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9jbHIuMTI1MTU
imprint Wiley, 2016
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2016
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 0905-7161, 1600-0501
issn_str_mv 0905-7161, 1600-0501
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:04:11.36Z
match_str menassa2016patientsexpectationssatisfactionandqualityoflifewithimmediateloadingprotocol
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 83-89
publishDate 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Clinical Oral Implants Research
source_id 49
spelling Menassa, Melanie de Grandmont, Pierre Audy, Nicholas Durand, Robert Rompré, Pierre Emami, Elham 0905-7161 1600-0501 Wiley Oral Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12515 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To examine patients’ expectations, the level of satisfaction, and the oral health‐related quality of life (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL) with regard to the implants’ immediate loading protocol (ILP) in edentate individuals.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This pilot trial used a pre–post design to assess patient‐centered outcomes in 18 edentate individuals (mean age 62.4 ± 7.7 years) who have received a 2‐implant (unsplinted) mandibular overdenture through an ILP. Visual analog scales, the McGill denture satisfaction questionnaire, and the oral health impact profile (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content>‐20) questionnaire were used to evaluate patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 4 months after surgery. Personality trait and socio‐demographic information were obtained using the revised <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">NEO</jats:styled-content> personality inventory and a self‐administered questionnaire, respectively. Non‐parametric methods and Brunner–Langer approach were used to analyze the data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The participants had a wide range of expectations regarding the ILP. Expectations included short‐term positive impact on aesthetics (83.3%) and social life (55.7%), as well as negative effects on comfort (5.6%), the ability to chew (11.1%), and the ability to clean the lower denture (11.1%). The ILP satisfied 94.4% of the participants, regardless of socio‐demographic and personality profiles. There was a statistically significant improvement in overall satisfaction, comfort, perceived aesthetics, stability of the overdenture, and ability to chew from baseline to 2‐week, 1‐, and 4‐month follow‐up (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p><jats:p>There was a statistically significant decrease in the total <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHIP</jats:styled-content> scores and all its domains (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) from baseline to 2 weeks. These differences remained statistically significant at 4‐month follow‐up. The ILP improved patients’ <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, regardless of the implant loss, the socio‐demographic characteristics, and personality traits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The ILP of two unsplinted implants with a mandibular overdenture significantly improved satisfaction and short‐term <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OHRQ</jats:styled-content>oL, and appears to meet expectations in edentulous elders. There was 100% agreement among patients on recommending this procedure to others.</jats:p></jats:sec> Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol Clinical Oral Implants Research
spellingShingle Menassa, Melanie, de Grandmont, Pierre, Audy, Nicholas, Durand, Robert, Rompré, Pierre, Emami, Elham, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol, Oral Surgery
title Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_full Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_fullStr Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_short Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_sort patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
title_unstemmed Patients’ expectations, satisfaction, and quality of life with immediate loading protocol
topic Oral Surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12515