author_facet Neuhaus, John M.
McCulloch, Charles E.
Neuhaus, John M.
McCulloch, Charles E.
author Neuhaus, John M.
McCulloch, Charles E.
spellingShingle Neuhaus, John M.
McCulloch, Charles E.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Statistics and Probability
author_sort neuhaus, john m.
spelling Neuhaus, John M. McCulloch, Charles E. 1369-1473 1467-842X Wiley Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty Statistics and Probability http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12290 <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>In longitudinal data where the timing and frequency of the measurement of outcomes may be associated with the value of the outcome, significant bias can occur. Previous results depended on correct specification of the outcome process and a somewhat unrealistic visit process model. In practice, this will never exactly be the case, so it is important to understand to what degree the results hold when those assumptions are violated in order to guide practical use of the methods. This paper presents theory and the results of simulation studies to extend our previous work to more realistic visit process models, as well as Poisson outcomes. We also assess the effects of several types of model misspecification. The estimated bias in these new settings generally mirrors the theoretical and simulation results of our previous work and provides confidence in using maximum likelihood methods in practice. Even when the assumptions about the outcome process did not hold, mixed effects models fit by maximum likelihood produced at most small bias in estimated regression coefficients, illustrating the robustness of these methods. This contrasts with generalised estimating equations approaches where bias increased in the settings of this paper. The analysis of data from a study of change in neurological outcomes following microsurgery for a brain arteriovenous malformation further illustrate the results.</jats:p> Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anzs.12290
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Mathematik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hbnpzLjEyMjkw
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hbnpzLjEyMjkw
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2020
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2020
issn 1467-842X
1369-1473
issn_str_mv 1467-842X
1369-1473
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str neuhaus2020robustestimationforlongitudinaldataunderoutcomedependentvisitprocesses
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
source_id 49
title Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_unstemmed Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_full Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_fullStr Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_full_unstemmed Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_short Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_sort robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
topic Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Statistics and Probability
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12290
publishDate 2020
physical 212-231
description <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>In longitudinal data where the timing and frequency of the measurement of outcomes may be associated with the value of the outcome, significant bias can occur. Previous results depended on correct specification of the outcome process and a somewhat unrealistic visit process model. In practice, this will never exactly be the case, so it is important to understand to what degree the results hold when those assumptions are violated in order to guide practical use of the methods. This paper presents theory and the results of simulation studies to extend our previous work to more realistic visit process models, as well as Poisson outcomes. We also assess the effects of several types of model misspecification. The estimated bias in these new settings generally mirrors the theoretical and simulation results of our previous work and provides confidence in using maximum likelihood methods in practice. Even when the assumptions about the outcome process did not hold, mixed effects models fit by maximum likelihood produced at most small bias in estimated regression coefficients, illustrating the robustness of these methods. This contrasts with generalised estimating equations approaches where bias increased in the settings of this paper. The analysis of data from a study of change in neurological outcomes following microsurgery for a brain arteriovenous malformation further illustrate the results.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 212
container_title Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
container_volume 62
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792333831423918083
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:18:42.548Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Robust+estimation+for+longitudinal+data+under+outcome%E2%80%90dependent+visit+processes&rft.date=2020-06-01&genre=article&issn=1467-842X&volume=62&issue=2&spage=212&epage=231&pages=212-231&jtitle=Australian+%26+New+Zealand+Journal+of+Statistics&atitle=Robust+estimation+for+longitudinal+data+under+outcome%E2%80%90dependent+visit+processes&aulast=McCulloch&aufirst=Charles+E.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fanzs.12290&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792333831423918083
author Neuhaus, John M., McCulloch, Charles E.
author_facet Neuhaus, John M., McCulloch, Charles E., Neuhaus, John M., McCulloch, Charles E.
author_sort neuhaus, john m.
container_issue 2
container_start_page 212
container_title Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
container_volume 62
description <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>In longitudinal data where the timing and frequency of the measurement of outcomes may be associated with the value of the outcome, significant bias can occur. Previous results depended on correct specification of the outcome process and a somewhat unrealistic visit process model. In practice, this will never exactly be the case, so it is important to understand to what degree the results hold when those assumptions are violated in order to guide practical use of the methods. This paper presents theory and the results of simulation studies to extend our previous work to more realistic visit process models, as well as Poisson outcomes. We also assess the effects of several types of model misspecification. The estimated bias in these new settings generally mirrors the theoretical and simulation results of our previous work and provides confidence in using maximum likelihood methods in practice. Even when the assumptions about the outcome process did not hold, mixed effects models fit by maximum likelihood produced at most small bias in estimated regression coefficients, illustrating the robustness of these methods. This contrasts with generalised estimating equations approaches where bias increased in the settings of this paper. The analysis of data from a study of change in neurological outcomes following microsurgery for a brain arteriovenous malformation further illustrate the results.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anzs.12290
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Mathematik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hbnpzLjEyMjkw
imprint Wiley, 2020
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2020
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1467-842X, 1369-1473
issn_str_mv 1467-842X, 1369-1473
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:18:42.548Z
match_str neuhaus2020robustestimationforlongitudinaldataunderoutcomedependentvisitprocesses
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 212-231
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
source_id 49
spelling Neuhaus, John M. McCulloch, Charles E. 1369-1473 1467-842X Wiley Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty Statistics and Probability http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12290 <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>In longitudinal data where the timing and frequency of the measurement of outcomes may be associated with the value of the outcome, significant bias can occur. Previous results depended on correct specification of the outcome process and a somewhat unrealistic visit process model. In practice, this will never exactly be the case, so it is important to understand to what degree the results hold when those assumptions are violated in order to guide practical use of the methods. This paper presents theory and the results of simulation studies to extend our previous work to more realistic visit process models, as well as Poisson outcomes. We also assess the effects of several types of model misspecification. The estimated bias in these new settings generally mirrors the theoretical and simulation results of our previous work and provides confidence in using maximum likelihood methods in practice. Even when the assumptions about the outcome process did not hold, mixed effects models fit by maximum likelihood produced at most small bias in estimated regression coefficients, illustrating the robustness of these methods. This contrasts with generalised estimating equations approaches where bias increased in the settings of this paper. The analysis of data from a study of change in neurological outcomes following microsurgery for a brain arteriovenous malformation further illustrate the results.</jats:p> Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
spellingShingle Neuhaus, John M., McCulloch, Charles E., Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability
title Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_full Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_fullStr Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_full_unstemmed Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_short Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_sort robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
title_unstemmed Robust estimation for longitudinal data under outcome‐dependent visit processes
topic Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12290