author_facet Kohn, Michael A.
Klok, Frederikus A.
van Es, Nick
Kohn, Michael A.
Klok, Frederikus A.
van Es, Nick
author Kohn, Michael A.
Klok, Frederikus A.
van Es, Nick
spellingShingle Kohn, Michael A.
Klok, Frederikus A.
van Es, Nick
Academic Emergency Medicine
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
Emergency Medicine
General Medicine
author_sort kohn, michael a.
spelling Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick 1069-6563 1553-2712 Wiley Emergency Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec> D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism Academic Emergency Medicine
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acem.13191
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hY2VtLjEzMTkx
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hY2VtLjEzMTkx
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
issn 1553-2712
1069-6563
issn_str_mv 1553-2712
1069-6563
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str kohn2017ddimerintervallikelihoodratiosforpulmonaryembolism
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Academic Emergency Medicine
source_id 49
title D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_unstemmed D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_full D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_fullStr D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_full_unstemmed D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_short D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_sort d‐dimer interval likelihood ratios for pulmonary embolism
topic Emergency Medicine
General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191
publishDate 2017
physical 832-837
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 7
container_start_page 832
container_title Academic Emergency Medicine
container_volume 24
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343174569525258
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:47:30.221Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=D%E2%80%90dimer+Interval+Likelihood+Ratios+for+Pulmonary+Embolism&rft.date=2017-07-01&genre=article&issn=1553-2712&volume=24&issue=7&spage=832&epage=837&pages=832-837&jtitle=Academic+Emergency+Medicine&atitle=D%E2%80%90dimer+Interval+Likelihood+Ratios+for+Pulmonary+Embolism&aulast=van+Es&aufirst=Nick&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Facem.13191&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343174569525258
author Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick
author_facet Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick, Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick
author_sort kohn, michael a.
container_issue 7
container_start_page 832
container_title Academic Emergency Medicine
container_volume 24
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acem.13191
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hY2VtLjEzMTkx
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1553-2712, 1069-6563
issn_str_mv 1553-2712, 1069-6563
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:47:30.221Z
match_str kohn2017ddimerintervallikelihoodratiosforpulmonaryembolism
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 832-837
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Academic Emergency Medicine
source_id 49
spelling Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick 1069-6563 1553-2712 Wiley Emergency Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec> D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism Academic Emergency Medicine
spellingShingle Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick, Academic Emergency Medicine, D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism, Emergency Medicine, General Medicine
title D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_full D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_fullStr D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_full_unstemmed D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_short D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
title_sort d‐dimer interval likelihood ratios for pulmonary embolism
title_unstemmed D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
topic Emergency Medicine, General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191