Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Academic Emergency Medicine |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
In: | Academic Emergency Medicine, 24, 2017, 7, S. 832-837 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick |
---|---|
author |
Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick |
spellingShingle |
Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick Academic Emergency Medicine D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism Emergency Medicine General Medicine |
author_sort |
kohn, michael a. |
spelling |
Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick 1069-6563 1553-2712 Wiley Emergency Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec> D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism Academic Emergency Medicine |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/acem.13191 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hY2VtLjEzMTkx |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hY2VtLjEzMTkx |
institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
imprint |
Wiley, 2017 |
imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2017 |
issn |
1553-2712 1069-6563 |
issn_str_mv |
1553-2712 1069-6563 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
match_str |
kohn2017ddimerintervallikelihoodratiosforpulmonaryembolism |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
publisher |
Wiley |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Academic Emergency Medicine |
source_id |
49 |
title |
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_unstemmed |
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_full |
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_fullStr |
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_full_unstemmed |
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_short |
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_sort |
d‐dimer interval likelihood ratios for pulmonary embolism |
topic |
Emergency Medicine General Medicine |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191 |
publishDate |
2017 |
physical |
832-837 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
container_issue |
7 |
container_start_page |
832 |
container_title |
Academic Emergency Medicine |
container_volume |
24 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792343174569525258 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:47:30.221Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=D%E2%80%90dimer+Interval+Likelihood+Ratios+for+Pulmonary+Embolism&rft.date=2017-07-01&genre=article&issn=1553-2712&volume=24&issue=7&spage=832&epage=837&pages=832-837&jtitle=Academic+Emergency+Medicine&atitle=D%E2%80%90dimer+Interval+Likelihood+Ratios+for+Pulmonary+Embolism&aulast=van+Es&aufirst=Nick&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Facem.13191&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792343174569525258 |
author | Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick |
author_facet | Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick, Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick |
author_sort | kohn, michael a. |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 832 |
container_title | Academic Emergency Medicine |
container_volume | 24 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/acem.13191 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Medizin |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hY2VtLjEzMTkx |
imprint | Wiley, 2017 |
imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2017 |
institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
issn | 1553-2712, 1069-6563 |
issn_str_mv | 1553-2712, 1069-6563 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:47:30.221Z |
match_str | kohn2017ddimerintervallikelihoodratiosforpulmonaryembolism |
mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
physical | 832-837 |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Academic Emergency Medicine |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Kohn, Michael A. Klok, Frederikus A. van Es, Nick 1069-6563 1553-2712 Wiley Emergency Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> diagnostic management studies to estimate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> = 1.9–2.1). Using these <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content> estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PE</jats:styled-content> is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content> will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">mL</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A decision strategy based on these approximate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">iLR</jats:styled-content>s agrees with several published strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec> D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism Academic Emergency Medicine |
spellingShingle | Kohn, Michael A., Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick, Academic Emergency Medicine, D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism, Emergency Medicine, General Medicine |
title | D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_full | D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_fullStr | D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_full_unstemmed | D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_short | D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
title_sort | d‐dimer interval likelihood ratios for pulmonary embolism |
title_unstemmed | D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism |
topic | Emergency Medicine, General Medicine |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191 |