author_facet Thurn, L
Wikman, A
Westgren, M
Lindqvist, PG
Thurn, L
Wikman, A
Westgren, M
Lindqvist, PG
author Thurn, L
Wikman, A
Westgren, M
Lindqvist, PG
spellingShingle Thurn, L
Wikman, A
Westgren, M
Lindqvist, PG
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
Obstetrics and Gynecology
author_sort thurn, l
spelling Thurn, L Wikman, A Westgren, M Lindqvist, PG 1470-0328 1471-0528 Wiley Obstetrics and Gynecology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15927 <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate incidence, trends over time, and risk factors for massive blood transfusions in obstetric patients. A secondary aim was to evaluate transfusion ratios in relation to massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Population‐based cohort.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Five hospitals, in the Stockholm County, Sweden, from 1990 to 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Population</jats:title><jats:p>All women that gave birth in Stockholm county, Sweden, and who received blood transfusions postpartum between 1990 and 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Data on pregnancies and deliveries from the Swedish National Medical Birth Registry was cross‐linked to the Stockholm transfusion database. Massive blood transfusion was defined as the transfusion of ≥10 units of red blood cells from partus through the next day.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measures</jats:title><jats:p>Main primary outcome was massive blood transfusion postpartum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Our cohort comprised 517 874 deliveries. Massive blood transfusion occurred in 277 women, for an incidence of 5.3 per 10 000 deliveries, and increased by 30% (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic>&lt;<jats:italic> </jats:italic>0.001) between the first and the second half of the study period. Major risk factors apparent before delivery were abnormal placentation (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">odds ratio [OR]</jats:styled-content> 41; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 29.3–58.1), pre‐eclampsia/placental abruption (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 2.8–5.6), and previous caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 3.1–6.0). Risk factors at time of delivery were uterine rupture, atonic uterus, and caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 38, 17, and 3, respectively).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>We found an increasing trend in the postpartum rate of massive transfusion. Women with abnormal placentation were found to have the highest increased risk. Improved antenatal awareness of these women at risk might improve management and reduce the rate of massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Tweetable abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Risk of massive blood transfusion in obstetric patients increases with placental complications and prior caesarean section.</jats:p></jats:sec> Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.15927
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS8xNDcxLTA1MjguMTU5Mjc
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS8xNDcxLTA1MjguMTU5Mjc
institution DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
issn_str_mv 1470-0328
1471-0528
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str thurn2019massivebloodtransfusioninrelationtodeliveryincidencetrendsandriskfactorsapopulationbasedcohortstudy
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
source_id 49
title Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_unstemmed Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_full Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_fullStr Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_short Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_sort massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
topic Obstetrics and Gynecology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15927
publishDate 2019
physical 1577-1586
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate incidence, trends over time, and risk factors for massive blood transfusions in obstetric patients. A secondary aim was to evaluate transfusion ratios in relation to massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Population‐based cohort.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Five hospitals, in the Stockholm County, Sweden, from 1990 to 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Population</jats:title><jats:p>All women that gave birth in Stockholm county, Sweden, and who received blood transfusions postpartum between 1990 and 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Data on pregnancies and deliveries from the Swedish National Medical Birth Registry was cross‐linked to the Stockholm transfusion database. Massive blood transfusion was defined as the transfusion of ≥10 units of red blood cells from partus through the next day.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measures</jats:title><jats:p>Main primary outcome was massive blood transfusion postpartum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Our cohort comprised 517 874 deliveries. Massive blood transfusion occurred in 277 women, for an incidence of 5.3 per 10 000 deliveries, and increased by 30% (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic>&lt;<jats:italic> </jats:italic>0.001) between the first and the second half of the study period. Major risk factors apparent before delivery were abnormal placentation (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">odds ratio [OR]</jats:styled-content> 41; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 29.3–58.1), pre‐eclampsia/placental abruption (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 2.8–5.6), and previous caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 3.1–6.0). Risk factors at time of delivery were uterine rupture, atonic uterus, and caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 38, 17, and 3, respectively).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>We found an increasing trend in the postpartum rate of massive transfusion. Women with abnormal placentation were found to have the highest increased risk. Improved antenatal awareness of these women at risk might improve management and reduce the rate of massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Tweetable abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Risk of massive blood transfusion in obstetric patients increases with placental complications and prior caesarean section.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1577
container_title BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
container_volume 126
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792345545406152704
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:25:12.75Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Massive+blood+transfusion+in+relation+to+delivery%3A+incidence%2C+trends+and+risk+factors%3A+a+population%E2%80%90based+cohort+study&rft.date=2019-12-01&genre=article&issn=1471-0528&volume=126&issue=13&spage=1577&epage=1586&pages=1577-1586&jtitle=BJOG%3A+An+International+Journal+of+Obstetrics+%26+Gynaecology&atitle=Massive+blood+transfusion+in+relation+to+delivery%3A+incidence%2C+trends+and+risk+factors%3A+a+population%E2%80%90based+cohort+study&aulast=Lindqvist&aufirst=PG&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2F1471-0528.15927&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792345545406152704
author Thurn, L, Wikman, A, Westgren, M, Lindqvist, PG
author_facet Thurn, L, Wikman, A, Westgren, M, Lindqvist, PG, Thurn, L, Wikman, A, Westgren, M, Lindqvist, PG
author_sort thurn, l
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1577
container_title BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
container_volume 126
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate incidence, trends over time, and risk factors for massive blood transfusions in obstetric patients. A secondary aim was to evaluate transfusion ratios in relation to massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Population‐based cohort.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Five hospitals, in the Stockholm County, Sweden, from 1990 to 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Population</jats:title><jats:p>All women that gave birth in Stockholm county, Sweden, and who received blood transfusions postpartum between 1990 and 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Data on pregnancies and deliveries from the Swedish National Medical Birth Registry was cross‐linked to the Stockholm transfusion database. Massive blood transfusion was defined as the transfusion of ≥10 units of red blood cells from partus through the next day.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measures</jats:title><jats:p>Main primary outcome was massive blood transfusion postpartum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Our cohort comprised 517 874 deliveries. Massive blood transfusion occurred in 277 women, for an incidence of 5.3 per 10 000 deliveries, and increased by 30% (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic>&lt;<jats:italic> </jats:italic>0.001) between the first and the second half of the study period. Major risk factors apparent before delivery were abnormal placentation (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">odds ratio [OR]</jats:styled-content> 41; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 29.3–58.1), pre‐eclampsia/placental abruption (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 2.8–5.6), and previous caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 3.1–6.0). Risk factors at time of delivery were uterine rupture, atonic uterus, and caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 38, 17, and 3, respectively).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>We found an increasing trend in the postpartum rate of massive transfusion. Women with abnormal placentation were found to have the highest increased risk. Improved antenatal awareness of these women at risk might improve management and reduce the rate of massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Tweetable abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Risk of massive blood transfusion in obstetric patients increases with placental complications and prior caesarean section.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.15927
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS8xNDcxLTA1MjguMTU5Mjc
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
institution DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14
issn 1470-0328, 1471-0528
issn_str_mv 1470-0328, 1471-0528
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:25:12.75Z
match_str thurn2019massivebloodtransfusioninrelationtodeliveryincidencetrendsandriskfactorsapopulationbasedcohortstudy
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 1577-1586
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
source_id 49
spelling Thurn, L Wikman, A Westgren, M Lindqvist, PG 1470-0328 1471-0528 Wiley Obstetrics and Gynecology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15927 <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To estimate incidence, trends over time, and risk factors for massive blood transfusions in obstetric patients. A secondary aim was to evaluate transfusion ratios in relation to massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Population‐based cohort.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Five hospitals, in the Stockholm County, Sweden, from 1990 to 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Population</jats:title><jats:p>All women that gave birth in Stockholm county, Sweden, and who received blood transfusions postpartum between 1990 and 2011.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Data on pregnancies and deliveries from the Swedish National Medical Birth Registry was cross‐linked to the Stockholm transfusion database. Massive blood transfusion was defined as the transfusion of ≥10 units of red blood cells from partus through the next day.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measures</jats:title><jats:p>Main primary outcome was massive blood transfusion postpartum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Our cohort comprised 517 874 deliveries. Massive blood transfusion occurred in 277 women, for an incidence of 5.3 per 10 000 deliveries, and increased by 30% (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic>&lt;<jats:italic> </jats:italic>0.001) between the first and the second half of the study period. Major risk factors apparent before delivery were abnormal placentation (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">odds ratio [OR]</jats:styled-content> 41; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 29.3–58.1), pre‐eclampsia/placental abruption (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 2.8–5.6), and previous caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4; 95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content> 3.1–6.0). Risk factors at time of delivery were uterine rupture, atonic uterus, and caesarean delivery (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 38, 17, and 3, respectively).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>We found an increasing trend in the postpartum rate of massive transfusion. Women with abnormal placentation were found to have the highest increased risk. Improved antenatal awareness of these women at risk might improve management and reduce the rate of massive transfusion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Tweetable abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Risk of massive blood transfusion in obstetric patients increases with placental complications and prior caesarean section.</jats:p></jats:sec> Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
spellingShingle Thurn, L, Wikman, A, Westgren, M, Lindqvist, PG, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study, Obstetrics and Gynecology
title Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_full Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_fullStr Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_short Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_sort massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
title_unstemmed Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population‐based cohort study
topic Obstetrics and Gynecology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15927