Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Family Therapy |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
In: | Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 1999, 1, S. 78-95 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Thomas, Volker Lewis, Robert A. Thomas, Volker Lewis, Robert A. |
---|---|
author |
Thomas, Volker Lewis, Robert A. |
spellingShingle |
Thomas, Volker Lewis, Robert A. Journal of Family Therapy Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Clinical Psychology Social Psychology |
author_sort |
thomas, volker |
spelling |
Thomas, Volker Lewis, Robert A. 0163-4445 1467-6427 Wiley Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Clinical Psychology Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00105 <jats:p>This study compared the clinical rating scales from the Circumplex Model (CCRS), the McMaster Model of Family Functioning (MCRS) and the Family Health Scales (FHS). A central purpose was to investigate whether observational rating scales designed to measure family functioning can also be used to assess couple functioning. One hundred and sixty‐six drug abusing women, receiving primary drug treatment in two metropolitan drug agencies in the southwest of the US, and their partners were videotaped while engaged in three couple tasks prior to receiving any treatment. The main findings indicated that all three rating scales have: (1) sufficient interrater reliability; (2) good construct validity, as reflected in factor analyses; and (3) very good convergent validity. However, there was some concern about whether these scales are as discriminating when measuring couples as they are when assessing families.</jats:p> Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison Journal of Family Therapy |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/1467-6427.00105 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Biologie Psychologie Allgemeines Medizin |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS8xNDY3LTY0MjcuMDAxMDU |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS8xNDY3LTY0MjcuMDAxMDU |
institution |
DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 |
imprint |
Wiley, 1999 |
imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 1999 |
issn |
0163-4445 1467-6427 |
issn_str_mv |
0163-4445 1467-6427 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
match_str |
thomas1999observationalcoupleassessmentacrossmodelcomparison |
publishDateSort |
1999 |
publisher |
Wiley |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Journal of Family Therapy |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_unstemmed |
Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_full |
Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_fullStr |
Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_short |
Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_sort |
observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
topic |
Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Clinical Psychology Social Psychology |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00105 |
publishDate |
1999 |
physical |
78-95 |
description |
<jats:p>This study compared the clinical rating scales from the Circumplex Model (CCRS), the McMaster Model of Family Functioning (MCRS) and the Family Health Scales (FHS). A central purpose was to investigate whether observational rating scales designed to measure family functioning can also be used to assess couple functioning. One hundred and sixty‐six drug abusing women, receiving primary drug treatment in two metropolitan drug agencies in the southwest of the US, and their partners were videotaped while engaged in three couple tasks prior to receiving any treatment. The main findings indicated that all three rating scales have: (1) sufficient interrater reliability; (2) good construct validity, as reflected in factor analyses; and (3) very good convergent validity. However, there was some concern about whether these scales are as discriminating when measuring couples as they are when assessing families.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
78 |
container_title |
Journal of Family Therapy |
container_volume |
21 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792334160691462153 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:23:48.967Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Observational+couple+assessment%3A+a+cross%E2%80%90model+comparison&rft.date=1999-02-01&genre=article&issn=1467-6427&volume=21&issue=1&spage=78&epage=95&pages=78-95&jtitle=Journal+of+Family+Therapy&atitle=Observational+couple+assessment%3A+a+cross%E2%80%90model+comparison&aulast=Lewis&aufirst=Robert+A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2F1467-6427.00105&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792334160691462153 |
author | Thomas, Volker, Lewis, Robert A. |
author_facet | Thomas, Volker, Lewis, Robert A., Thomas, Volker, Lewis, Robert A. |
author_sort | thomas, volker |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Journal of Family Therapy |
container_volume | 21 |
description | <jats:p>This study compared the clinical rating scales from the Circumplex Model (CCRS), the McMaster Model of Family Functioning (MCRS) and the Family Health Scales (FHS). A central purpose was to investigate whether observational rating scales designed to measure family functioning can also be used to assess couple functioning. One hundred and sixty‐six drug abusing women, receiving primary drug treatment in two metropolitan drug agencies in the southwest of the US, and their partners were videotaped while engaged in three couple tasks prior to receiving any treatment. The main findings indicated that all three rating scales have: (1) sufficient interrater reliability; (2) good construct validity, as reflected in factor analyses; and (3) very good convergent validity. However, there was some concern about whether these scales are as discriminating when measuring couples as they are when assessing families.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-6427.00105 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Biologie, Psychologie, Allgemeines, Medizin |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS8xNDY3LTY0MjcuMDAxMDU |
imprint | Wiley, 1999 |
imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 1999 |
institution | DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275 |
issn | 0163-4445, 1467-6427 |
issn_str_mv | 0163-4445, 1467-6427 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:23:48.967Z |
match_str | thomas1999observationalcoupleassessmentacrossmodelcomparison |
mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
physical | 78-95 |
publishDate | 1999 |
publishDateSort | 1999 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Journal of Family Therapy |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Thomas, Volker Lewis, Robert A. 0163-4445 1467-6427 Wiley Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Clinical Psychology Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00105 <jats:p>This study compared the clinical rating scales from the Circumplex Model (CCRS), the McMaster Model of Family Functioning (MCRS) and the Family Health Scales (FHS). A central purpose was to investigate whether observational rating scales designed to measure family functioning can also be used to assess couple functioning. One hundred and sixty‐six drug abusing women, receiving primary drug treatment in two metropolitan drug agencies in the southwest of the US, and their partners were videotaped while engaged in three couple tasks prior to receiving any treatment. The main findings indicated that all three rating scales have: (1) sufficient interrater reliability; (2) good construct validity, as reflected in factor analyses; and (3) very good convergent validity. However, there was some concern about whether these scales are as discriminating when measuring couples as they are when assessing families.</jats:p> Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison Journal of Family Therapy |
spellingShingle | Thomas, Volker, Lewis, Robert A., Journal of Family Therapy, Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison, Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology |
title | Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_full | Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_fullStr | Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_short | Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_sort | observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
title_unstemmed | Observational couple assessment: a cross‐model comparison |
topic | Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00105 |