author_facet Endeshaw, Berhanu
Endeshaw, Berhanu
author Endeshaw, Berhanu
spellingShingle Endeshaw, Berhanu
Journal of Health Research
Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health Policy
Education
Cultural Studies
author_sort endeshaw, berhanu
spelling Endeshaw, Berhanu 0857-4421 2586-940X Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health Policy Education Cultural Studies http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jhr-07-2019-0152 <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to review existing healthcare service quality-measurement models.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>A review of the literature was conducted utilizing keywords “healthcare’’, “service quality’’, “measurement models”, “SERVQUAL”, “SERVPERF”, “HEALTHQUAL”, “PubHosQual” and “HospitalQual”. These investigations were selected from the “Emerald’’, “ABI/Inform”, “ScienceDirect” and “EBSCOhost” databases. A range of studies used in the makeup of the healthcare quality-measurement model for a 36 years period (1979 to 2015) were examined in an exhaustive survey of the literature. Of 137 studies reviewed, 74 studies were selected for analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>As yet, no consensus has been reached among scholars on the definition and indicators and factors of the quality of the healthcare services. Moreover, most of the current models are of Western origin and incongruent with the cultural and economic contexts of developing countries. The previous studies create scales resembling the generic measures of service quality, which may not be completely appropriate for assessing the perceived quality of healthcare services. Furthermore, previous studies were too narrow, overemphasizing the quality of healthcare only as far as the functional aspect of the services were concerned and paying too little attention to the technical aspects, using the experience of healthcare providers. These results have much room for failures. This is therefore advising healthcare organizations that need to develop their own models for measuring the quality of their services.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>Generic models no longer suffice in measuring the quality of healthcare services. Developing countries should try and develop their own models for measuring the quality of healthcare services.</jats:p></jats:sec> Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review Journal of Health Research
doi_str_mv 10.1108/jhr-07-2019-0152
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
Pädagogik
Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9qaHItMDctMjAxOS0wMTUy
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9qaHItMDctMjAxOS0wMTUy
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS, 2020
imprint_str_mv Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS, 2020
issn 0857-4421
2586-940X
issn_str_mv 0857-4421
2586-940X
language English
mega_collection Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS (CrossRef)
match_str endeshaw2020healthcareservicequalitymeasurementmodelsareview
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Health Research
source_id 49
title Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_unstemmed Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_full Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_fullStr Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_short Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_sort healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
topic Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health Policy
Education
Cultural Studies
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jhr-07-2019-0152
publishDate 2020
physical 106-117
description <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to review existing healthcare service quality-measurement models.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>A review of the literature was conducted utilizing keywords “healthcare’’, “service quality’’, “measurement models”, “SERVQUAL”, “SERVPERF”, “HEALTHQUAL”, “PubHosQual” and “HospitalQual”. These investigations were selected from the “Emerald’’, “ABI/Inform”, “ScienceDirect” and “EBSCOhost” databases. A range of studies used in the makeup of the healthcare quality-measurement model for a 36 years period (1979 to 2015) were examined in an exhaustive survey of the literature. Of 137 studies reviewed, 74 studies were selected for analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>As yet, no consensus has been reached among scholars on the definition and indicators and factors of the quality of the healthcare services. Moreover, most of the current models are of Western origin and incongruent with the cultural and economic contexts of developing countries. The previous studies create scales resembling the generic measures of service quality, which may not be completely appropriate for assessing the perceived quality of healthcare services. Furthermore, previous studies were too narrow, overemphasizing the quality of healthcare only as far as the functional aspect of the services were concerned and paying too little attention to the technical aspects, using the experience of healthcare providers. These results have much room for failures. This is therefore advising healthcare organizations that need to develop their own models for measuring the quality of their services.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>Generic models no longer suffice in measuring the quality of healthcare services. Developing countries should try and develop their own models for measuring the quality of healthcare services.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 106
container_title Journal of Health Research
container_volume 35
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792346264897060867
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:36:25.447Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Healthcare+service+quality-measurement+models%3A+a+review&rft.date=2020-04-07&genre=article&issn=2586-940X&volume=35&issue=2&spage=106&epage=117&pages=106-117&jtitle=Journal+of+Health+Research&atitle=Healthcare+service+quality-measurement+models%3A+a+review&aulast=Endeshaw&aufirst=Berhanu&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1108%2Fjhr-07-2019-0152&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792346264897060867
author Endeshaw, Berhanu
author_facet Endeshaw, Berhanu, Endeshaw, Berhanu
author_sort endeshaw, berhanu
container_issue 2
container_start_page 106
container_title Journal of Health Research
container_volume 35
description <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to review existing healthcare service quality-measurement models.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>A review of the literature was conducted utilizing keywords “healthcare’’, “service quality’’, “measurement models”, “SERVQUAL”, “SERVPERF”, “HEALTHQUAL”, “PubHosQual” and “HospitalQual”. These investigations were selected from the “Emerald’’, “ABI/Inform”, “ScienceDirect” and “EBSCOhost” databases. A range of studies used in the makeup of the healthcare quality-measurement model for a 36 years period (1979 to 2015) were examined in an exhaustive survey of the literature. Of 137 studies reviewed, 74 studies were selected for analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>As yet, no consensus has been reached among scholars on the definition and indicators and factors of the quality of the healthcare services. Moreover, most of the current models are of Western origin and incongruent with the cultural and economic contexts of developing countries. The previous studies create scales resembling the generic measures of service quality, which may not be completely appropriate for assessing the perceived quality of healthcare services. Furthermore, previous studies were too narrow, overemphasizing the quality of healthcare only as far as the functional aspect of the services were concerned and paying too little attention to the technical aspects, using the experience of healthcare providers. These results have much room for failures. This is therefore advising healthcare organizations that need to develop their own models for measuring the quality of their services.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>Generic models no longer suffice in measuring the quality of healthcare services. Developing countries should try and develop their own models for measuring the quality of healthcare services.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1108/jhr-07-2019-0152
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin, Pädagogik, Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9qaHItMDctMjAxOS0wMTUy
imprint Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS, 2020
imprint_str_mv Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS, 2020
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0857-4421, 2586-940X
issn_str_mv 0857-4421, 2586-940X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:36:25.447Z
match_str endeshaw2020healthcareservicequalitymeasurementmodelsareview
mega_collection Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS (CrossRef)
physical 106-117
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Health Research
source_id 49
spelling Endeshaw, Berhanu 0857-4421 2586-940X Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health Policy Education Cultural Studies http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jhr-07-2019-0152 <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to review existing healthcare service quality-measurement models.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>A review of the literature was conducted utilizing keywords “healthcare’’, “service quality’’, “measurement models”, “SERVQUAL”, “SERVPERF”, “HEALTHQUAL”, “PubHosQual” and “HospitalQual”. These investigations were selected from the “Emerald’’, “ABI/Inform”, “ScienceDirect” and “EBSCOhost” databases. A range of studies used in the makeup of the healthcare quality-measurement model for a 36 years period (1979 to 2015) were examined in an exhaustive survey of the literature. Of 137 studies reviewed, 74 studies were selected for analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>As yet, no consensus has been reached among scholars on the definition and indicators and factors of the quality of the healthcare services. Moreover, most of the current models are of Western origin and incongruent with the cultural and economic contexts of developing countries. The previous studies create scales resembling the generic measures of service quality, which may not be completely appropriate for assessing the perceived quality of healthcare services. Furthermore, previous studies were too narrow, overemphasizing the quality of healthcare only as far as the functional aspect of the services were concerned and paying too little attention to the technical aspects, using the experience of healthcare providers. These results have much room for failures. This is therefore advising healthcare organizations that need to develop their own models for measuring the quality of their services.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>Generic models no longer suffice in measuring the quality of healthcare services. Developing countries should try and develop their own models for measuring the quality of healthcare services.</jats:p></jats:sec> Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review Journal of Health Research
spellingShingle Endeshaw, Berhanu, Journal of Health Research, Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Policy, Education, Cultural Studies
title Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_full Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_fullStr Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_short Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_sort healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
title_unstemmed Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review
topic Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Policy, Education, Cultural Studies
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jhr-07-2019-0152