author_facet Martin, Dick
Martin, Dick
author Martin, Dick
spellingShingle Martin, Dick
Journal of Business Strategy
Towards a model of trust
Strategy and Management
Management Information Systems
author_sort martin, dick
spelling Martin, Dick 0275-6668 Emerald Strategy and Management Management Information Systems http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jbs-05-2014-0053 <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>– This article aims to hypothesize a model of trust in both senses of the word – a model, as in something to emulate, and a model as in a structural framework that describes its components. Almost all business people agree that winning and keeping the trust of customers, investors, employees and other stakeholders is critical to business success. There is also broad agreement that trust in business and government has been in serious decline over the past few decades, as documented in a number of studies. Ironically, however, there is little agreement on the nature of trust. Researchers and strategists use the word loosely, without a common definition of its components and with no clear understanding of the process by which it is built, nurtured – and lost.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>– Based on syndicated research and the more than three-decades experience in public relations, the author suggests that trust has both rational and emotional components that arise from stakeholders’ perception of their own affinity with a brand, company or individual, as well as their judgments of its competencies and purpose. Stakeholder perceptions along these dimensions can be displayed within a three-dimensional matrix, which can explain a range of rational/emotional reactions ranging from simple disappointment and begrudging respect to complete distrust and unquestioned trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>– The model of trust is useful for analyzing a brand, company or individual’s present trust position. It will also enable strategists to design a thoughtful, balanced approach to maintaining or improving stakeholder trust. The model allows strategists to articulate a set of actions and behaviors that will build on strengths, fill voids and correct past errors.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title><jats:p>– This is a theoretical hypothesis that still needs to be tested, but it appears to present a useful approach to considering issues of trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>– The new model builds on existing research to address an issue that has become even more critical to organizations and individuals in a world of instant communication and everyman publishing. Applying the model to business decision-making will protect firms from inadvertently losing stakeholder trust and enhance their ability to build even stronger stakeholder relationships.</jats:p></jats:sec> Towards a model of trust Journal of Business Strategy
doi_str_mv 10.1108/jbs-05-2014-0053
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9qYnMtMDUtMjAxNC0wMDUz
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9qYnMtMDUtMjAxNC0wMDUz
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Emerald, 2014
imprint_str_mv Emerald, 2014
issn 0275-6668
issn_str_mv 0275-6668
language English
mega_collection Emerald (CrossRef)
match_str martin2014towardsamodeloftrust
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Emerald
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Business Strategy
source_id 49
title Towards a model of trust
title_unstemmed Towards a model of trust
title_full Towards a model of trust
title_fullStr Towards a model of trust
title_full_unstemmed Towards a model of trust
title_short Towards a model of trust
title_sort towards a model of trust
topic Strategy and Management
Management Information Systems
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jbs-05-2014-0053
publishDate 2014
physical 45-51
description <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>– This article aims to hypothesize a model of trust in both senses of the word – a model, as in something to emulate, and a model as in a structural framework that describes its components. Almost all business people agree that winning and keeping the trust of customers, investors, employees and other stakeholders is critical to business success. There is also broad agreement that trust in business and government has been in serious decline over the past few decades, as documented in a number of studies. Ironically, however, there is little agreement on the nature of trust. Researchers and strategists use the word loosely, without a common definition of its components and with no clear understanding of the process by which it is built, nurtured – and lost.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>– Based on syndicated research and the more than three-decades experience in public relations, the author suggests that trust has both rational and emotional components that arise from stakeholders’ perception of their own affinity with a brand, company or individual, as well as their judgments of its competencies and purpose. Stakeholder perceptions along these dimensions can be displayed within a three-dimensional matrix, which can explain a range of rational/emotional reactions ranging from simple disappointment and begrudging respect to complete distrust and unquestioned trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>– The model of trust is useful for analyzing a brand, company or individual’s present trust position. It will also enable strategists to design a thoughtful, balanced approach to maintaining or improving stakeholder trust. The model allows strategists to articulate a set of actions and behaviors that will build on strengths, fill voids and correct past errors.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title><jats:p>– This is a theoretical hypothesis that still needs to be tested, but it appears to present a useful approach to considering issues of trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>– The new model builds on existing research to address an issue that has become even more critical to organizations and individuals in a world of instant communication and everyman publishing. Applying the model to business decision-making will protect firms from inadvertently losing stakeholder trust and enhance their ability to build even stronger stakeholder relationships.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 45
container_title Journal of Business Strategy
container_volume 35
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792329798666682382
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:14:55.259Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Towards+a+model+of+trust&rft.date=2014-07-15&genre=article&issn=0275-6668&volume=35&issue=4&spage=45&epage=51&pages=45-51&jtitle=Journal+of+Business+Strategy&atitle=Towards+a+model+of+trust&aulast=Martin&aufirst=Dick&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1108%2Fjbs-05-2014-0053&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792329798666682382
author Martin, Dick
author_facet Martin, Dick, Martin, Dick
author_sort martin, dick
container_issue 4
container_start_page 45
container_title Journal of Business Strategy
container_volume 35
description <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>– This article aims to hypothesize a model of trust in both senses of the word – a model, as in something to emulate, and a model as in a structural framework that describes its components. Almost all business people agree that winning and keeping the trust of customers, investors, employees and other stakeholders is critical to business success. There is also broad agreement that trust in business and government has been in serious decline over the past few decades, as documented in a number of studies. Ironically, however, there is little agreement on the nature of trust. Researchers and strategists use the word loosely, without a common definition of its components and with no clear understanding of the process by which it is built, nurtured – and lost.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>– Based on syndicated research and the more than three-decades experience in public relations, the author suggests that trust has both rational and emotional components that arise from stakeholders’ perception of their own affinity with a brand, company or individual, as well as their judgments of its competencies and purpose. Stakeholder perceptions along these dimensions can be displayed within a three-dimensional matrix, which can explain a range of rational/emotional reactions ranging from simple disappointment and begrudging respect to complete distrust and unquestioned trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>– The model of trust is useful for analyzing a brand, company or individual’s present trust position. It will also enable strategists to design a thoughtful, balanced approach to maintaining or improving stakeholder trust. The model allows strategists to articulate a set of actions and behaviors that will build on strengths, fill voids and correct past errors.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title><jats:p>– This is a theoretical hypothesis that still needs to be tested, but it appears to present a useful approach to considering issues of trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>– The new model builds on existing research to address an issue that has become even more critical to organizations and individuals in a world of instant communication and everyman publishing. Applying the model to business decision-making will protect firms from inadvertently losing stakeholder trust and enhance their ability to build even stronger stakeholder relationships.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1108/jbs-05-2014-0053
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9qYnMtMDUtMjAxNC0wMDUz
imprint Emerald, 2014
imprint_str_mv Emerald, 2014
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 0275-6668
issn_str_mv 0275-6668
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:14:55.259Z
match_str martin2014towardsamodeloftrust
mega_collection Emerald (CrossRef)
physical 45-51
publishDate 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Emerald
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Business Strategy
source_id 49
spelling Martin, Dick 0275-6668 Emerald Strategy and Management Management Information Systems http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jbs-05-2014-0053 <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>– This article aims to hypothesize a model of trust in both senses of the word – a model, as in something to emulate, and a model as in a structural framework that describes its components. Almost all business people agree that winning and keeping the trust of customers, investors, employees and other stakeholders is critical to business success. There is also broad agreement that trust in business and government has been in serious decline over the past few decades, as documented in a number of studies. Ironically, however, there is little agreement on the nature of trust. Researchers and strategists use the word loosely, without a common definition of its components and with no clear understanding of the process by which it is built, nurtured – and lost.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>– Based on syndicated research and the more than three-decades experience in public relations, the author suggests that trust has both rational and emotional components that arise from stakeholders’ perception of their own affinity with a brand, company or individual, as well as their judgments of its competencies and purpose. Stakeholder perceptions along these dimensions can be displayed within a three-dimensional matrix, which can explain a range of rational/emotional reactions ranging from simple disappointment and begrudging respect to complete distrust and unquestioned trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>– The model of trust is useful for analyzing a brand, company or individual’s present trust position. It will also enable strategists to design a thoughtful, balanced approach to maintaining or improving stakeholder trust. The model allows strategists to articulate a set of actions and behaviors that will build on strengths, fill voids and correct past errors.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title><jats:p>– This is a theoretical hypothesis that still needs to be tested, but it appears to present a useful approach to considering issues of trust.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>– The new model builds on existing research to address an issue that has become even more critical to organizations and individuals in a world of instant communication and everyman publishing. Applying the model to business decision-making will protect firms from inadvertently losing stakeholder trust and enhance their ability to build even stronger stakeholder relationships.</jats:p></jats:sec> Towards a model of trust Journal of Business Strategy
spellingShingle Martin, Dick, Journal of Business Strategy, Towards a model of trust, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems
title Towards a model of trust
title_full Towards a model of trust
title_fullStr Towards a model of trust
title_full_unstemmed Towards a model of trust
title_short Towards a model of trust
title_sort towards a model of trust
title_unstemmed Towards a model of trust
topic Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jbs-05-2014-0053