author_facet Aminpour, Payam
Gray, Steven
Richardson, Robert
Singer, Alison
Castro-Diaz, Laura
Schaefer, Marie
Ramlan, Mohd Aswad
Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo
Aminpour, Payam
Gray, Steven
Richardson, Robert
Singer, Alison
Castro-Diaz, Laura
Schaefer, Marie
Ramlan, Mohd Aswad
Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo
author Aminpour, Payam
Gray, Steven
Richardson, Robert
Singer, Alison
Castro-Diaz, Laura
Schaefer, Marie
Ramlan, Mohd Aswad
Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo
spellingShingle Aminpour, Payam
Gray, Steven
Richardson, Robert
Singer, Alison
Castro-Diaz, Laura
Schaefer, Marie
Ramlan, Mohd Aswad
Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
Education
Human Factors and Ergonomics
author_sort aminpour, payam
spelling Aminpour, Payam Gray, Steven Richardson, Robert Singer, Alison Castro-Diaz, Laura Schaefer, Marie Ramlan, Mohd Aswad Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo 1467-6370 1467-6370 Emerald Education Human Factors and Ergonomics http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2019-0161 <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to investigate different ways in which faculty members of sustainability-related departments in universities across the world perceive, understand and define sustainability and how these definitions are linked to their demographics and epistemological beliefs.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>Scholars from different disciplines investigate the sustainability of social-ecological systems from different perspectives. Such differences in the understanding of, and approaches to, sustainability have created ambiguity within the field and may weaken its effectiveness, impact and reputation as a field of research. To contribute to the discussion about sustainability definition, a survey was conducted involving university faculty members working in sustainability-related academic departments around the world. Participants’ responses were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 involving descriptive and inferential statistics and principle component analysis. Additionally, responses to open-ended questions were qualitatively analyzed.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Factor analysis on sustainability definition items reveal four emergent universal definitions of sustainability, labeled as Environmentalism concerns, Common understanding, neo-Malthusian environmentalism and Sustainability as well-being. Statistical analyses indicate that individuals from developed countries are more likely to define sustainability as Environmentalism and Common understanding; however, individuals from developing countries tend to define sustainability as well-being. Also, more heavily engaged scholars in interdisciplinary research of sustainability are more likely to perceive sustainability as Common understanding. Logistic Regression models demonstrate a connection between epistemological perspectives of researchers and sustainability definitions. Qualitative content analysis indicates that interdisciplinarity and collaboration are the most common challenges to sustainability research.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>The findings of this study demonstrate disconnects between scholars from developing and developed countries in understanding and defining sustainability, and these disconnects may present further challenges for global sustainability scholarship.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
doi_str_mv 10.1108/ijshe-05-2019-0161
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Pädagogik
Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9panNoZS0wNS0yMDE5LTAxNjE
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9panNoZS0wNS0yMDE5LTAxNjE
institution DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
imprint Emerald, 2020
imprint_str_mv Emerald, 2020
issn 1467-6370
issn_str_mv 1467-6370
language English
mega_collection Emerald (CrossRef)
match_str aminpour2020perspectivesofscholarsonthenatureofsustainabilityasurveystudy
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Emerald
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
source_id 49
title Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_unstemmed Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_full Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_fullStr Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_short Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_sort perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
topic Education
Human Factors and Ergonomics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2019-0161
publishDate 2020
physical 34-53
description <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to investigate different ways in which faculty members of sustainability-related departments in universities across the world perceive, understand and define sustainability and how these definitions are linked to their demographics and epistemological beliefs.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>Scholars from different disciplines investigate the sustainability of social-ecological systems from different perspectives. Such differences in the understanding of, and approaches to, sustainability have created ambiguity within the field and may weaken its effectiveness, impact and reputation as a field of research. To contribute to the discussion about sustainability definition, a survey was conducted involving university faculty members working in sustainability-related academic departments around the world. Participants’ responses were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 involving descriptive and inferential statistics and principle component analysis. Additionally, responses to open-ended questions were qualitatively analyzed.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Factor analysis on sustainability definition items reveal four emergent universal definitions of sustainability, labeled as Environmentalism concerns, Common understanding, neo-Malthusian environmentalism and Sustainability as well-being. Statistical analyses indicate that individuals from developed countries are more likely to define sustainability as Environmentalism and Common understanding; however, individuals from developing countries tend to define sustainability as well-being. Also, more heavily engaged scholars in interdisciplinary research of sustainability are more likely to perceive sustainability as Common understanding. Logistic Regression models demonstrate a connection between epistemological perspectives of researchers and sustainability definitions. Qualitative content analysis indicates that interdisciplinarity and collaboration are the most common challenges to sustainability research.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>The findings of this study demonstrate disconnects between scholars from developing and developed countries in understanding and defining sustainability, and these disconnects may present further challenges for global sustainability scholarship.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
container_volume 21
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343781600657413
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:57:09.681Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Perspectives+of+scholars+on+the+nature+of+sustainability%3A+a+survey+study&rft.date=2020-01-06&genre=article&issn=1467-6370&volume=21&issue=1&spage=34&epage=53&pages=34-53&jtitle=International+Journal+of+Sustainability+in+Higher+Education&atitle=Perspectives+of+scholars+on+the+nature+of+sustainability%3A+a+survey+study&aulast=Chikowore&aufirst=Noleen+Rutendo&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1108%2Fijshe-05-2019-0161&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343781600657413
author Aminpour, Payam, Gray, Steven, Richardson, Robert, Singer, Alison, Castro-Diaz, Laura, Schaefer, Marie, Ramlan, Mohd Aswad, Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo
author_facet Aminpour, Payam, Gray, Steven, Richardson, Robert, Singer, Alison, Castro-Diaz, Laura, Schaefer, Marie, Ramlan, Mohd Aswad, Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo, Aminpour, Payam, Gray, Steven, Richardson, Robert, Singer, Alison, Castro-Diaz, Laura, Schaefer, Marie, Ramlan, Mohd Aswad, Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo
author_sort aminpour, payam
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
container_volume 21
description <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to investigate different ways in which faculty members of sustainability-related departments in universities across the world perceive, understand and define sustainability and how these definitions are linked to their demographics and epistemological beliefs.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>Scholars from different disciplines investigate the sustainability of social-ecological systems from different perspectives. Such differences in the understanding of, and approaches to, sustainability have created ambiguity within the field and may weaken its effectiveness, impact and reputation as a field of research. To contribute to the discussion about sustainability definition, a survey was conducted involving university faculty members working in sustainability-related academic departments around the world. Participants’ responses were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 involving descriptive and inferential statistics and principle component analysis. Additionally, responses to open-ended questions were qualitatively analyzed.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Factor analysis on sustainability definition items reveal four emergent universal definitions of sustainability, labeled as Environmentalism concerns, Common understanding, neo-Malthusian environmentalism and Sustainability as well-being. Statistical analyses indicate that individuals from developed countries are more likely to define sustainability as Environmentalism and Common understanding; however, individuals from developing countries tend to define sustainability as well-being. Also, more heavily engaged scholars in interdisciplinary research of sustainability are more likely to perceive sustainability as Common understanding. Logistic Regression models demonstrate a connection between epistemological perspectives of researchers and sustainability definitions. Qualitative content analysis indicates that interdisciplinarity and collaboration are the most common challenges to sustainability research.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>The findings of this study demonstrate disconnects between scholars from developing and developed countries in understanding and defining sustainability, and these disconnects may present further challenges for global sustainability scholarship.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1108/ijshe-05-2019-0161
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Pädagogik, Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9panNoZS0wNS0yMDE5LTAxNjE
imprint Emerald, 2020
imprint_str_mv Emerald, 2020
institution DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1
issn 1467-6370
issn_str_mv 1467-6370
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:57:09.681Z
match_str aminpour2020perspectivesofscholarsonthenatureofsustainabilityasurveystudy
mega_collection Emerald (CrossRef)
physical 34-53
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Emerald
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
source_id 49
spelling Aminpour, Payam Gray, Steven Richardson, Robert Singer, Alison Castro-Diaz, Laura Schaefer, Marie Ramlan, Mohd Aswad Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo 1467-6370 1467-6370 Emerald Education Human Factors and Ergonomics http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2019-0161 <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to investigate different ways in which faculty members of sustainability-related departments in universities across the world perceive, understand and define sustainability and how these definitions are linked to their demographics and epistemological beliefs.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>Scholars from different disciplines investigate the sustainability of social-ecological systems from different perspectives. Such differences in the understanding of, and approaches to, sustainability have created ambiguity within the field and may weaken its effectiveness, impact and reputation as a field of research. To contribute to the discussion about sustainability definition, a survey was conducted involving university faculty members working in sustainability-related academic departments around the world. Participants’ responses were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 involving descriptive and inferential statistics and principle component analysis. Additionally, responses to open-ended questions were qualitatively analyzed.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Factor analysis on sustainability definition items reveal four emergent universal definitions of sustainability, labeled as Environmentalism concerns, Common understanding, neo-Malthusian environmentalism and Sustainability as well-being. Statistical analyses indicate that individuals from developed countries are more likely to define sustainability as Environmentalism and Common understanding; however, individuals from developing countries tend to define sustainability as well-being. Also, more heavily engaged scholars in interdisciplinary research of sustainability are more likely to perceive sustainability as Common understanding. Logistic Regression models demonstrate a connection between epistemological perspectives of researchers and sustainability definitions. Qualitative content analysis indicates that interdisciplinarity and collaboration are the most common challenges to sustainability research.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>The findings of this study demonstrate disconnects between scholars from developing and developed countries in understanding and defining sustainability, and these disconnects may present further challenges for global sustainability scholarship.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
spellingShingle Aminpour, Payam, Gray, Steven, Richardson, Robert, Singer, Alison, Castro-Diaz, Laura, Schaefer, Marie, Ramlan, Mohd Aswad, Chikowore, Noleen Rutendo, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study, Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics
title Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_full Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_fullStr Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_short Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_sort perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
title_unstemmed Perspectives of scholars on the nature of sustainability: a survey study
topic Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2019-0161