Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27, 2020, 6, S. 1377-1400 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Emerald
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Gurgun, Asli Pelin Koc, Kerim Gurgun, Asli Pelin Koc, Kerim |
|---|---|
| author |
Gurgun, Asli Pelin Koc, Kerim |
| spellingShingle |
Gurgun, Asli Pelin Koc, Kerim Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey General Business, Management and Accounting Building and Construction Architecture Civil and Structural Engineering |
| author_sort |
gurgun, asli pelin |
| spelling |
Gurgun, Asli Pelin Koc, Kerim 0969-9988 Emerald General Business, Management and Accounting Building and Construction Architecture Civil and Structural Engineering http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0543 <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>Competent contractors are one of the critical stakeholders to achieve targeted sustainability objectives in green building (GB) projects. Prior to contractor selection, prequalification is an important step, which requires contractors with certain capabilities in addition to traditional features. This study aims to develop a systematic and practical model for prequalification in GB projects using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach by adopting the analytical hierarchy process (AHP).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p><jats:underline>The</jats:underline>AHP model with 8 main criteria groups and 25 sub-criteria is structured based on literature review and professional opinions accompanied by a pilot study. Then, interviews with experts, who are experienced in the development and application phases of GB projects in Turkey, are arranged to collect judgements. The agreement levels between different groups of experts are analysed via Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Model applicability is tested on six hypothetical contractors for practicality.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The results show that i) financial capabilities, ii) legal status and iii) sustainability groups are the top three main criteria, while i) compliance with schedule requirements of the client, ii) current legal status including suits, iii) negative litigation history records, iv) contractor's compliance capacity to client's sustainability checklist for the proposed project and v) sustainability with lower life cycle cost (durability, maintenance, constructability) are the top five sub-criteria.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>There is a gap in the literature analysing contractor prequalification phase in GB projects. This study attempts to fill this lack provided with a practical evaluation tool.</jats:p></jats:sec> Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0543 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Technik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9lY2FtLTEwLTIwMTktMDU0Mw |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9lY2FtLTEwLTIwMTktMDU0Mw |
| institution |
DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 |
| imprint |
Emerald, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Emerald, 2020 |
| issn |
0969-9988 |
| issn_str_mv |
0969-9988 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Emerald (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
gurgun2020contractorprequalificationforgreenbuildingsevidencefromturkey |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| publisher |
Emerald |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_unstemmed |
Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_full |
Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_fullStr |
Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_short |
Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_sort |
contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from turkey |
| topic |
General Business, Management and Accounting Building and Construction Architecture Civil and Structural Engineering |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0543 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| physical |
1377-1400 |
| description |
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>Competent contractors are one of the critical stakeholders to achieve targeted sustainability objectives in green building (GB) projects. Prior to contractor selection, prequalification is an important step, which requires contractors with certain capabilities in addition to traditional features. This study aims to develop a systematic and practical model for prequalification in GB projects using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach by adopting the analytical hierarchy process (AHP).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p><jats:underline>The</jats:underline>AHP model with 8 main criteria groups and 25 sub-criteria is structured based on literature review and professional opinions accompanied by a pilot study. Then, interviews with experts, who are experienced in the development and application phases of GB projects in Turkey, are arranged to collect judgements. The agreement levels between different groups of experts are analysed via Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Model applicability is tested on six hypothetical contractors for practicality.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The results show that i) financial capabilities, ii) legal status and iii) sustainability groups are the top three main criteria, while i) compliance with schedule requirements of the client, ii) current legal status including suits, iii) negative litigation history records, iv) contractor's compliance capacity to client's sustainability checklist for the proposed project and v) sustainability with lower life cycle cost (durability, maintenance, constructability) are the top five sub-criteria.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>There is a gap in the literature analysing contractor prequalification phase in GB projects. This study attempts to fill this lack provided with a practical evaluation tool.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
6 |
| container_start_page |
1377 |
| container_title |
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
| container_volume |
27 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792344306937233409 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:05:29.428Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Contractor+prequalification+for+green+buildings%E2%80%94evidence+from+Turkey&rft.date=2020-01-30&genre=article&issn=0969-9988&volume=27&issue=6&spage=1377&epage=1400&pages=1377-1400&jtitle=Engineering%2C+Construction+and+Architectural+Management&atitle=Contractor+prequalification+for+green+buildings%E2%80%94evidence+from+Turkey&aulast=Koc&aufirst=Kerim&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1108%2Fecam-10-2019-0543&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792344306937233409 |
| author | Gurgun, Asli Pelin, Koc, Kerim |
| author_facet | Gurgun, Asli Pelin, Koc, Kerim, Gurgun, Asli Pelin, Koc, Kerim |
| author_sort | gurgun, asli pelin |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1377 |
| container_title | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
| container_volume | 27 |
| description | <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>Competent contractors are one of the critical stakeholders to achieve targeted sustainability objectives in green building (GB) projects. Prior to contractor selection, prequalification is an important step, which requires contractors with certain capabilities in addition to traditional features. This study aims to develop a systematic and practical model for prequalification in GB projects using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach by adopting the analytical hierarchy process (AHP).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p><jats:underline>The</jats:underline>AHP model with 8 main criteria groups and 25 sub-criteria is structured based on literature review and professional opinions accompanied by a pilot study. Then, interviews with experts, who are experienced in the development and application phases of GB projects in Turkey, are arranged to collect judgements. The agreement levels between different groups of experts are analysed via Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Model applicability is tested on six hypothetical contractors for practicality.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The results show that i) financial capabilities, ii) legal status and iii) sustainability groups are the top three main criteria, while i) compliance with schedule requirements of the client, ii) current legal status including suits, iii) negative litigation history records, iv) contractor's compliance capacity to client's sustainability checklist for the proposed project and v) sustainability with lower life cycle cost (durability, maintenance, constructability) are the top five sub-criteria.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>There is a gap in the literature analysing contractor prequalification phase in GB projects. This study attempts to fill this lack provided with a practical evaluation tool.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0543 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Technik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEwOC9lY2FtLTEwLTIwMTktMDU0Mw |
| imprint | Emerald, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv | Emerald, 2020 |
| institution | DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3 |
| issn | 0969-9988 |
| issn_str_mv | 0969-9988 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:05:29.428Z |
| match_str | gurgun2020contractorprequalificationforgreenbuildingsevidencefromturkey |
| mega_collection | Emerald (CrossRef) |
| physical | 1377-1400 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Emerald |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Gurgun, Asli Pelin Koc, Kerim 0969-9988 Emerald General Business, Management and Accounting Building and Construction Architecture Civil and Structural Engineering http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0543 <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>Competent contractors are one of the critical stakeholders to achieve targeted sustainability objectives in green building (GB) projects. Prior to contractor selection, prequalification is an important step, which requires contractors with certain capabilities in addition to traditional features. This study aims to develop a systematic and practical model for prequalification in GB projects using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach by adopting the analytical hierarchy process (AHP).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p><jats:underline>The</jats:underline>AHP model with 8 main criteria groups and 25 sub-criteria is structured based on literature review and professional opinions accompanied by a pilot study. Then, interviews with experts, who are experienced in the development and application phases of GB projects in Turkey, are arranged to collect judgements. The agreement levels between different groups of experts are analysed via Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Model applicability is tested on six hypothetical contractors for practicality.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The results show that i) financial capabilities, ii) legal status and iii) sustainability groups are the top three main criteria, while i) compliance with schedule requirements of the client, ii) current legal status including suits, iii) negative litigation history records, iv) contractor's compliance capacity to client's sustainability checklist for the proposed project and v) sustainability with lower life cycle cost (durability, maintenance, constructability) are the top five sub-criteria.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>There is a gap in the literature analysing contractor prequalification phase in GB projects. This study attempts to fill this lack provided with a practical evaluation tool.</jats:p></jats:sec> Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
| spellingShingle | Gurgun, Asli Pelin, Koc, Kerim, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey, General Business, Management and Accounting, Building and Construction, Architecture, Civil and Structural Engineering |
| title | Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_full | Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_fullStr | Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_short | Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| title_sort | contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from turkey |
| title_unstemmed | Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey |
| topic | General Business, Management and Accounting, Building and Construction, Architecture, Civil and Structural Engineering |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0543 |