Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Academic Emergency Medicine |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , |
| In: | Academic Emergency Medicine, 11, 2004, 6, S. 715-719 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Sadosty, Annie T. Stead, Latha G. Boie, Eric T. Goyal, Deepi G. Weaver, Amy L. Decker, Wyatt W. Sadosty, Annie T. Stead, Latha G. Boie, Eric T. Goyal, Deepi G. Weaver, Amy L. Decker, Wyatt W. |
|---|---|
| author |
Sadosty, Annie T. Stead, Latha G. Boie, Eric T. Goyal, Deepi G. Weaver, Amy L. Decker, Wyatt W. |
| spellingShingle |
Sadosty, Annie T. Stead, Latha G. Boie, Eric T. Goyal, Deepi G. Weaver, Amy L. Decker, Wyatt W. Academic Emergency Medicine Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up Emergency Medicine General Medicine |
| author_sort |
sadosty, annie t. |
| spelling |
Sadosty, Annie T. Stead, Latha G. Boie, Eric T. Goyal, Deepi G. Weaver, Amy L. Decker, Wyatt W. 1069-6563 1553-2712 Wiley Emergency Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.027 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:bold>Objectives:</jats:bold> To date, no studies in emergency medicine (EM) have addressed the educational value of the Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine's (RRC‐EM) requirement for patient follow‐up (FU). The authors examined whether performance of patient FU improved EM resident education. <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold>All EM resident FU encounters from September 25, 2001, through September 24, 2002, were documented and analyzed. All EM residents at a regional tertiary referral emergency department (ED) initiated patient FU encounters by entering information regarding patients' initial ED presentations into a Web‐based follow‐up system (WBFUS), subsequently entered FU information, and indicated whether they thought that the specific FU encounters improved their education (yes/no). Supervising faculty members then reviewed the residents' completed FU entries. Blinded to residents' responses regarding educational utility, faculty members evaluated whether they thought the specific FU encounters were educational for the residents (yes/no). Data entered into the WBFUS were then summarized as percentages. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> Eight hundred forty‐seven FU encounters were completed by 18 EM residents and 29 EM faculty. Ninety‐three percent of the FU entries were deemed by at least one evaluator (resident or faculty) to have educational value. Residents found the act of performing FU educational in 81.3% of cases, whereas faculty thought 80.4% were educational for the resident. Although the residents and faculty agreed on the educational value in 75.4% of cases, the overall strength of the agreement was slight to fair (kappa statistic = 0.21). <jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold> This study indicates that EM residents and faculty believe that the act of performing patient FU has educational value for EM residents; however, the interobserver agreement between residents and faculty was low.</jats:p> Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up Academic Emergency Medicine |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.027 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE5Ny9qLmFlbS4yMDAzLjEyLjAyNw |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE5Ny9qLmFlbS4yMDAzLjEyLjAyNw |
| institution |
DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2004 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2004 |
| issn |
1553-2712 1069-6563 |
| issn_str_mv |
1553-2712 1069-6563 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
sadosty2004evaluationoftheeducationalutilityofpatientfollowup |
| publishDateSort |
2004 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Academic Emergency Medicine |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_full |
Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_short |
Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_sort |
evaluation of the educational utility of patient follow‐up |
| topic |
Emergency Medicine General Medicine |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.027 |
| publishDate |
2004 |
| physical |
715-719 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:bold>Objectives:</jats:bold> To date, no studies in emergency medicine (EM) have addressed the educational value of the Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine's (RRC‐EM) requirement for patient follow‐up (FU). The authors examined whether performance of patient FU improved EM resident education. <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold>All EM resident FU encounters from September 25, 2001, through September 24, 2002, were documented and analyzed. All EM residents at a regional tertiary referral emergency department (ED) initiated patient FU encounters by entering information regarding patients' initial ED presentations into a Web‐based follow‐up system (WBFUS), subsequently entered FU information, and indicated whether they thought that the specific FU encounters improved their education (yes/no). Supervising faculty members then reviewed the residents' completed FU entries. Blinded to residents' responses regarding educational utility, faculty members evaluated whether they thought the specific FU encounters were educational for the residents (yes/no). Data entered into the WBFUS were then summarized as percentages. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> Eight hundred forty‐seven FU encounters were completed by 18 EM residents and 29 EM faculty. Ninety‐three percent of the FU entries were deemed by at least one evaluator (resident or faculty) to have educational value. Residents found the act of performing FU educational in 81.3% of cases, whereas faculty thought 80.4% were educational for the resident. Although the residents and faculty agreed on the educational value in 75.4% of cases, the overall strength of the agreement was slight to fair (kappa statistic = 0.21). <jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold> This study indicates that EM residents and faculty believe that the act of performing patient FU has educational value for EM residents; however, the interobserver agreement between residents and faculty was low.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
6 |
| container_start_page |
715 |
| container_title |
Academic Emergency Medicine |
| container_volume |
11 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792338511643279368 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:33:13.484Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Evaluation+of+the+Educational+Utility+of+Patient+Follow%E2%80%90up&rft.date=2004-06-01&genre=article&issn=1553-2712&volume=11&issue=6&spage=715&epage=719&pages=715-719&jtitle=Academic+Emergency+Medicine&atitle=Evaluation+of+the+Educational+Utility+of+Patient+Follow%E2%80%90up&aulast=Decker&aufirst=Wyatt+W.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1197%2Fj.aem.2003.12.027&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792338511643279368 |
| author | Sadosty, Annie T., Stead, Latha G., Boie, Eric T., Goyal, Deepi G., Weaver, Amy L., Decker, Wyatt W. |
| author_facet | Sadosty, Annie T., Stead, Latha G., Boie, Eric T., Goyal, Deepi G., Weaver, Amy L., Decker, Wyatt W., Sadosty, Annie T., Stead, Latha G., Boie, Eric T., Goyal, Deepi G., Weaver, Amy L., Decker, Wyatt W. |
| author_sort | sadosty, annie t. |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 715 |
| container_title | Academic Emergency Medicine |
| container_volume | 11 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:bold>Objectives:</jats:bold> To date, no studies in emergency medicine (EM) have addressed the educational value of the Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine's (RRC‐EM) requirement for patient follow‐up (FU). The authors examined whether performance of patient FU improved EM resident education. <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold>All EM resident FU encounters from September 25, 2001, through September 24, 2002, were documented and analyzed. All EM residents at a regional tertiary referral emergency department (ED) initiated patient FU encounters by entering information regarding patients' initial ED presentations into a Web‐based follow‐up system (WBFUS), subsequently entered FU information, and indicated whether they thought that the specific FU encounters improved their education (yes/no). Supervising faculty members then reviewed the residents' completed FU entries. Blinded to residents' responses regarding educational utility, faculty members evaluated whether they thought the specific FU encounters were educational for the residents (yes/no). Data entered into the WBFUS were then summarized as percentages. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> Eight hundred forty‐seven FU encounters were completed by 18 EM residents and 29 EM faculty. Ninety‐three percent of the FU entries were deemed by at least one evaluator (resident or faculty) to have educational value. Residents found the act of performing FU educational in 81.3% of cases, whereas faculty thought 80.4% were educational for the resident. Although the residents and faculty agreed on the educational value in 75.4% of cases, the overall strength of the agreement was slight to fair (kappa statistic = 0.21). <jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold> This study indicates that EM residents and faculty believe that the act of performing patient FU has educational value for EM residents; however, the interobserver agreement between residents and faculty was low.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.027 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE5Ny9qLmFlbS4yMDAzLjEyLjAyNw |
| imprint | Wiley, 2004 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2004 |
| institution | DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1 |
| issn | 1553-2712, 1069-6563 |
| issn_str_mv | 1553-2712, 1069-6563 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:33:13.484Z |
| match_str | sadosty2004evaluationoftheeducationalutilityofpatientfollowup |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 715-719 |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Academic Emergency Medicine |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Sadosty, Annie T. Stead, Latha G. Boie, Eric T. Goyal, Deepi G. Weaver, Amy L. Decker, Wyatt W. 1069-6563 1553-2712 Wiley Emergency Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.027 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:bold>Objectives:</jats:bold> To date, no studies in emergency medicine (EM) have addressed the educational value of the Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine's (RRC‐EM) requirement for patient follow‐up (FU). The authors examined whether performance of patient FU improved EM resident education. <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold>All EM resident FU encounters from September 25, 2001, through September 24, 2002, were documented and analyzed. All EM residents at a regional tertiary referral emergency department (ED) initiated patient FU encounters by entering information regarding patients' initial ED presentations into a Web‐based follow‐up system (WBFUS), subsequently entered FU information, and indicated whether they thought that the specific FU encounters improved their education (yes/no). Supervising faculty members then reviewed the residents' completed FU entries. Blinded to residents' responses regarding educational utility, faculty members evaluated whether they thought the specific FU encounters were educational for the residents (yes/no). Data entered into the WBFUS were then summarized as percentages. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> Eight hundred forty‐seven FU encounters were completed by 18 EM residents and 29 EM faculty. Ninety‐three percent of the FU entries were deemed by at least one evaluator (resident or faculty) to have educational value. Residents found the act of performing FU educational in 81.3% of cases, whereas faculty thought 80.4% were educational for the resident. Although the residents and faculty agreed on the educational value in 75.4% of cases, the overall strength of the agreement was slight to fair (kappa statistic = 0.21). <jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold> This study indicates that EM residents and faculty believe that the act of performing patient FU has educational value for EM residents; however, the interobserver agreement between residents and faculty was low.</jats:p> Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up Academic Emergency Medicine |
| spellingShingle | Sadosty, Annie T., Stead, Latha G., Boie, Eric T., Goyal, Deepi G., Weaver, Amy L., Decker, Wyatt W., Academic Emergency Medicine, Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up, Emergency Medicine, General Medicine |
| title | Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_full | Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_short | Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| title_sort | evaluation of the educational utility of patient follow‐up |
| title_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Educational Utility of Patient Follow‐up |
| topic | Emergency Medicine, General Medicine |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.027 |