Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Research & Politics |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
| In: | Research & Politics, 5, 2018, 1, S. 205316801774938 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Johnson, Lauren R. McCray, Deon Ragusa, Jordan M. Johnson, Lauren R. McCray, Deon Ragusa, Jordan M. |
|---|---|
| author |
Johnson, Lauren R. McCray, Deon Ragusa, Jordan M. |
| spellingShingle |
Johnson, Lauren R. McCray, Deon Ragusa, Jordan M. Research & Politics #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election Political Science and International Relations Public Administration Sociology and Political Science |
| author_sort |
johnson, lauren r. |
| spelling |
Johnson, Lauren R. McCray, Deon Ragusa, Jordan M. 2053-1680 2053-1680 SAGE Publications Political Science and International Relations Public Administration Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053168017749383 <jats:p> In an election characterized by countless headlines, the refusal of Republicans to support their party’s nominee was a constant topic of discussion in 2016. Our paper looks to explain why Republican members of Congress joined the so-called #NeverTrump movement. In the first part, we document the varied—and often contradictory—explanations of the #NeverTrump movement offered by journalists, pundits, and politicians during the campaign. We then categorize these popular explanations into four theoretical categories: policy preferences, identity, electoral motivations, and establishment dynamics. In the second part, we test the varied claims. We believe two findings stand out and have broader implications for American politics. First, despite the popular belief that members of Congress are single-minded in their pursuit of reelection, we found that a lawmaker’s religion and sex—both in the identity category—had the largest effects on the decision to join the #NeverTrump movement. Second, the results show that establishment Republicans were more likely to support Donald Trump’s candidacy. Notably, the direction of this effect is inconsistent with popular explanations of the #NeverTrump movement but consistent with a range of academic studies. </jats:p> #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election Research & Politics |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1177/2053168017749383 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Allgemeines Soziologie Politologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8yMDUzMTY4MDE3NzQ5Mzgz |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8yMDUzMTY4MDE3NzQ5Mzgz |
| institution |
DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 |
| imprint |
SAGE Publications, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv |
SAGE Publications, 2018 |
| issn |
2053-1680 |
| issn_str_mv |
2053-1680 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
johnson2018nevertrumpwhyrepublicanmembersofcongressrefusedtosupporttheirpartysnomineeinthe2016presidentialelection |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| publisher |
SAGE Publications |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Research & Politics |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_unstemmed |
#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_full |
#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_fullStr |
#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_full_unstemmed |
#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_short |
#NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_sort |
#nevertrump: why republican members of congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| topic |
Political Science and International Relations Public Administration Sociology and Political Science |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053168017749383 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| physical |
205316801774938 |
| description |
<jats:p> In an election characterized by countless headlines, the refusal of Republicans to support their party’s nominee was a constant topic of discussion in 2016. Our paper looks to explain why Republican members of Congress joined the so-called #NeverTrump movement. In the first part, we document the varied—and often contradictory—explanations of the #NeverTrump movement offered by journalists, pundits, and politicians during the campaign. We then categorize these popular explanations into four theoretical categories: policy preferences, identity, electoral motivations, and establishment dynamics. In the second part, we test the varied claims. We believe two findings stand out and have broader implications for American politics. First, despite the popular belief that members of Congress are single-minded in their pursuit of reelection, we found that a lawmaker’s religion and sex—both in the identity category—had the largest effects on the decision to join the #NeverTrump movement. Second, the results show that establishment Republicans were more likely to support Donald Trump’s candidacy. Notably, the direction of this effect is inconsistent with popular explanations of the #NeverTrump movement but consistent with a range of academic studies. </jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
Research & Politics |
| container_volume |
5 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792338204724035594 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:26:49.919Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=%23NeverTrump%3A+Why+Republican+members+of+Congress+refused+to+support+their+party%E2%80%99s+nominee+in+the+2016+presidential+election&rft.date=2018-01-01&genre=article&issn=2053-1680&volume=5&issue=1&pages=205316801774938&jtitle=Research+%26+Politics&atitle=%23NeverTrump%3A+Why+Republican+members+of+Congress+refused+to+support+their+party%E2%80%99s+nominee+in+the+2016+presidential+election&aulast=Ragusa&aufirst=Jordan+M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1177%2F2053168017749383&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792338204724035594 |
| author | Johnson, Lauren R., McCray, Deon, Ragusa, Jordan M. |
| author_facet | Johnson, Lauren R., McCray, Deon, Ragusa, Jordan M., Johnson, Lauren R., McCray, Deon, Ragusa, Jordan M. |
| author_sort | johnson, lauren r. |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | Research & Politics |
| container_volume | 5 |
| description | <jats:p> In an election characterized by countless headlines, the refusal of Republicans to support their party’s nominee was a constant topic of discussion in 2016. Our paper looks to explain why Republican members of Congress joined the so-called #NeverTrump movement. In the first part, we document the varied—and often contradictory—explanations of the #NeverTrump movement offered by journalists, pundits, and politicians during the campaign. We then categorize these popular explanations into four theoretical categories: policy preferences, identity, electoral motivations, and establishment dynamics. In the second part, we test the varied claims. We believe two findings stand out and have broader implications for American politics. First, despite the popular belief that members of Congress are single-minded in their pursuit of reelection, we found that a lawmaker’s religion and sex—both in the identity category—had the largest effects on the decision to join the #NeverTrump movement. Second, the results show that establishment Republicans were more likely to support Donald Trump’s candidacy. Notably, the direction of this effect is inconsistent with popular explanations of the #NeverTrump movement but consistent with a range of academic studies. </jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2053168017749383 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Allgemeines, Soziologie, Politologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8yMDUzMTY4MDE3NzQ5Mzgz |
| imprint | SAGE Publications, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv | SAGE Publications, 2018 |
| institution | DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4 |
| issn | 2053-1680 |
| issn_str_mv | 2053-1680 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:26:49.919Z |
| match_str | johnson2018nevertrumpwhyrepublicanmembersofcongressrefusedtosupporttheirpartysnomineeinthe2016presidentialelection |
| mega_collection | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| physical | 205316801774938 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Research & Politics |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Johnson, Lauren R. McCray, Deon Ragusa, Jordan M. 2053-1680 2053-1680 SAGE Publications Political Science and International Relations Public Administration Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053168017749383 <jats:p> In an election characterized by countless headlines, the refusal of Republicans to support their party’s nominee was a constant topic of discussion in 2016. Our paper looks to explain why Republican members of Congress joined the so-called #NeverTrump movement. In the first part, we document the varied—and often contradictory—explanations of the #NeverTrump movement offered by journalists, pundits, and politicians during the campaign. We then categorize these popular explanations into four theoretical categories: policy preferences, identity, electoral motivations, and establishment dynamics. In the second part, we test the varied claims. We believe two findings stand out and have broader implications for American politics. First, despite the popular belief that members of Congress are single-minded in their pursuit of reelection, we found that a lawmaker’s religion and sex—both in the identity category—had the largest effects on the decision to join the #NeverTrump movement. Second, the results show that establishment Republicans were more likely to support Donald Trump’s candidacy. Notably, the direction of this effect is inconsistent with popular explanations of the #NeverTrump movement but consistent with a range of academic studies. </jats:p> #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election Research & Politics |
| spellingShingle | Johnson, Lauren R., McCray, Deon, Ragusa, Jordan M., Research & Politics, #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science |
| title | #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_full | #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_fullStr | #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_full_unstemmed | #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_short | #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_sort | #nevertrump: why republican members of congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| title_unstemmed | #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election |
| topic | Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053168017749383 |