Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Should surgical outcomes be published?
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , |
| In: | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 108, 2015, 4, S. 127-135 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Chou, Evelyn Abboudi, Hamid Shamim Khan, Mohammed Dasgupta, Prokar Ahmed, Kamran Chou, Evelyn Abboudi, Hamid Shamim Khan, Mohammed Dasgupta, Prokar Ahmed, Kamran |
|---|---|
| author |
Chou, Evelyn Abboudi, Hamid Shamim Khan, Mohammed Dasgupta, Prokar Ahmed, Kamran |
| spellingShingle |
Chou, Evelyn Abboudi, Hamid Shamim Khan, Mohammed Dasgupta, Prokar Ahmed, Kamran Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Should surgical outcomes be published? General Medicine |
| author_sort |
chou, evelyn |
| spelling |
Chou, Evelyn Abboudi, Hamid Shamim Khan, Mohammed Dasgupta, Prokar Ahmed, Kamran 0141-0768 1758-1095 SAGE Publications General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076815578652 <jats:p> Despite publishing surgical outcomes being a positive step forwards in the progression of England’s healthcare system, it has no doubt been faced with criticism and reservations. This review article aims to discuss the pros and cons of publishing individual surgical outcomes, as well as the challenges faced. Publishing outcomes requires data from a number of sources such as national clinical audits, hospital episode statistics, patient-reported outcomes, registers and information from revalidation. As yet, eight surgical specialties have begun publishing their data, including cardiac (coronary artery bypass graft, valve and aortic surgery), endocrine (thyroidectomy, lobectomy, isthmusectomy), orthopaedic (hip and knee replacement), urological (full and partial nephrectomies, nephroureterectomy), colorectal (bowel tumour removal), upper gastrointestinal (stomach cancer and oesophageal cancer removal, bariatric surgery), ear, nose and throat surgery (larynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and salivary gland cancer removal), as well as vascular surgery (abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy). However, not all procedures have been addressed. Despite the controversy surrounding the topic of publishing surgical outcomes, the advantages of reporting outcomes outweigh the disadvantages, and these challenges can be overcome, to create a more reliable, trustworthy and transparent NHS. Perhaps one of the main challenges has been the difficulty in collecting large amounts of clinically significant data able to quantify the performance of surgeons. </jats:p> Should surgical outcomes be published? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1177/0141076815578652 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8wMTQxMDc2ODE1NTc4NjUy |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8wMTQxMDc2ODE1NTc4NjUy |
| institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
SAGE Publications, 2015 |
| imprint_str_mv |
SAGE Publications, 2015 |
| issn |
0141-0768 1758-1095 |
| issn_str_mv |
0141-0768 1758-1095 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
chou2015shouldsurgicaloutcomesbepublished |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| publisher |
SAGE Publications |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_unstemmed |
Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_full |
Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_fullStr |
Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_short |
Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_sort |
should surgical outcomes be published? |
| topic |
General Medicine |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076815578652 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| physical |
127-135 |
| description |
<jats:p> Despite publishing surgical outcomes being a positive step forwards in the progression of England’s healthcare system, it has no doubt been faced with criticism and reservations. This review article aims to discuss the pros and cons of publishing individual surgical outcomes, as well as the challenges faced. Publishing outcomes requires data from a number of sources such as national clinical audits, hospital episode statistics, patient-reported outcomes, registers and information from revalidation. As yet, eight surgical specialties have begun publishing their data, including cardiac (coronary artery bypass graft, valve and aortic surgery), endocrine (thyroidectomy, lobectomy, isthmusectomy), orthopaedic (hip and knee replacement), urological (full and partial nephrectomies, nephroureterectomy), colorectal (bowel tumour removal), upper gastrointestinal (stomach cancer and oesophageal cancer removal, bariatric surgery), ear, nose and throat surgery (larynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and salivary gland cancer removal), as well as vascular surgery (abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy). However, not all procedures have been addressed. Despite the controversy surrounding the topic of publishing surgical outcomes, the advantages of reporting outcomes outweigh the disadvantages, and these challenges can be overcome, to create a more reliable, trustworthy and transparent NHS. Perhaps one of the main challenges has been the difficulty in collecting large amounts of clinically significant data able to quantify the performance of surgeons. </jats:p> |
| container_issue |
4 |
| container_start_page |
127 |
| container_title |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| container_volume |
108 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792342317988839425 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:33:39.867Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Should+surgical+outcomes+be+published%3F&rft.date=2015-04-01&genre=article&issn=1758-1095&volume=108&issue=4&spage=127&epage=135&pages=127-135&jtitle=Journal+of+the+Royal+Society+of+Medicine&atitle=Should+surgical+outcomes+be+published%3F&aulast=Ahmed&aufirst=Kamran&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1177%2F0141076815578652&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792342317988839425 |
| author | Chou, Evelyn, Abboudi, Hamid, Shamim Khan, Mohammed, Dasgupta, Prokar, Ahmed, Kamran |
| author_facet | Chou, Evelyn, Abboudi, Hamid, Shamim Khan, Mohammed, Dasgupta, Prokar, Ahmed, Kamran, Chou, Evelyn, Abboudi, Hamid, Shamim Khan, Mohammed, Dasgupta, Prokar, Ahmed, Kamran |
| author_sort | chou, evelyn |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 127 |
| container_title | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| container_volume | 108 |
| description | <jats:p> Despite publishing surgical outcomes being a positive step forwards in the progression of England’s healthcare system, it has no doubt been faced with criticism and reservations. This review article aims to discuss the pros and cons of publishing individual surgical outcomes, as well as the challenges faced. Publishing outcomes requires data from a number of sources such as national clinical audits, hospital episode statistics, patient-reported outcomes, registers and information from revalidation. As yet, eight surgical specialties have begun publishing their data, including cardiac (coronary artery bypass graft, valve and aortic surgery), endocrine (thyroidectomy, lobectomy, isthmusectomy), orthopaedic (hip and knee replacement), urological (full and partial nephrectomies, nephroureterectomy), colorectal (bowel tumour removal), upper gastrointestinal (stomach cancer and oesophageal cancer removal, bariatric surgery), ear, nose and throat surgery (larynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and salivary gland cancer removal), as well as vascular surgery (abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy). However, not all procedures have been addressed. Despite the controversy surrounding the topic of publishing surgical outcomes, the advantages of reporting outcomes outweigh the disadvantages, and these challenges can be overcome, to create a more reliable, trustworthy and transparent NHS. Perhaps one of the main challenges has been the difficulty in collecting large amounts of clinically significant data able to quantify the performance of surgeons. </jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0141076815578652 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8wMTQxMDc2ODE1NTc4NjUy |
| imprint | SAGE Publications, 2015 |
| imprint_str_mv | SAGE Publications, 2015 |
| institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161 |
| issn | 0141-0768, 1758-1095 |
| issn_str_mv | 0141-0768, 1758-1095 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:33:39.867Z |
| match_str | chou2015shouldsurgicaloutcomesbepublished |
| mega_collection | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| physical | 127-135 |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Chou, Evelyn Abboudi, Hamid Shamim Khan, Mohammed Dasgupta, Prokar Ahmed, Kamran 0141-0768 1758-1095 SAGE Publications General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076815578652 <jats:p> Despite publishing surgical outcomes being a positive step forwards in the progression of England’s healthcare system, it has no doubt been faced with criticism and reservations. This review article aims to discuss the pros and cons of publishing individual surgical outcomes, as well as the challenges faced. Publishing outcomes requires data from a number of sources such as national clinical audits, hospital episode statistics, patient-reported outcomes, registers and information from revalidation. As yet, eight surgical specialties have begun publishing their data, including cardiac (coronary artery bypass graft, valve and aortic surgery), endocrine (thyroidectomy, lobectomy, isthmusectomy), orthopaedic (hip and knee replacement), urological (full and partial nephrectomies, nephroureterectomy), colorectal (bowel tumour removal), upper gastrointestinal (stomach cancer and oesophageal cancer removal, bariatric surgery), ear, nose and throat surgery (larynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and salivary gland cancer removal), as well as vascular surgery (abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy). However, not all procedures have been addressed. Despite the controversy surrounding the topic of publishing surgical outcomes, the advantages of reporting outcomes outweigh the disadvantages, and these challenges can be overcome, to create a more reliable, trustworthy and transparent NHS. Perhaps one of the main challenges has been the difficulty in collecting large amounts of clinically significant data able to quantify the performance of surgeons. </jats:p> Should surgical outcomes be published? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| spellingShingle | Chou, Evelyn, Abboudi, Hamid, Shamim Khan, Mohammed, Dasgupta, Prokar, Ahmed, Kamran, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Should surgical outcomes be published?, General Medicine |
| title | Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_full | Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_fullStr | Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_short | Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_sort | should surgical outcomes be published? |
| title_unstemmed | Should surgical outcomes be published? |
| topic | General Medicine |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076815578652 |