Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Educational and Psychological Measurement |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 2017, 2, S. 241-262 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Born, Sebastian Frey, Andreas Born, Sebastian Frey, Andreas |
|---|---|
| author |
Born, Sebastian Frey, Andreas |
| spellingShingle |
Born, Sebastian Frey, Andreas Educational and Psychological Measurement Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing Applied Mathematics Applied Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology Education |
| author_sort |
born, sebastian |
| spelling |
Born, Sebastian Frey, Andreas 0013-1644 1552-3888 SAGE Publications Applied Mathematics Applied Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164416643744 <jats:p> Although multidimensional adaptive testing (MAT) has been proven to be highly advantageous with regard to measurement efficiency when several highly correlated dimensions are measured, there are few operational assessments that use MAT. This may be due to issues of constraint management, which is more complex in MAT than it is in unidimensional adaptive testing. Very few studies have examined the performance of existing constraint management methods (CMMs) in MAT. The present article focuses on the effectiveness of two promising heuristic CMMs in MAT for varying levels of imposed constraints and for various correlations between the measured dimensions. Through a simulation study, the multidimensional maximum priority index (MMPI) and multidimensional weighted penalty model (MWPM), as an extension of the weighted penalty model, are examined with regard to measurement precision and constraint violations. The results show that both CMMs are capable of addressing complex constraints in MAT. However, measurement precision losses were found to differ between the MMPI and MWPM. While the MMPI appears to be more suitable for use in assessment situations involving few to a moderate number of constraints, the MWPM should be used when numerous constraints are involved. </jats:p> Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing Educational and Psychological Measurement |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1177/0013164416643744 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Psychologie Biologie Pädagogik Mathematik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8wMDEzMTY0NDE2NjQzNzQ0 |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8wMDEzMTY0NDE2NjQzNzQ0 |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
SAGE Publications, 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv |
SAGE Publications, 2017 |
| issn |
0013-1644 1552-3888 |
| issn_str_mv |
0013-1644 1552-3888 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
born2017heuristicconstraintmanagementmethodsinmultidimensionaladaptivetesting |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| publisher |
SAGE Publications |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Educational and Psychological Measurement |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_unstemmed |
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_full |
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_fullStr |
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_short |
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_sort |
heuristic constraint management methods in multidimensional adaptive testing |
| topic |
Applied Mathematics Applied Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology Education |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164416643744 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| physical |
241-262 |
| description |
<jats:p> Although multidimensional adaptive testing (MAT) has been proven to be highly advantageous with regard to measurement efficiency when several highly correlated dimensions are measured, there are few operational assessments that use MAT. This may be due to issues of constraint management, which is more complex in MAT than it is in unidimensional adaptive testing. Very few studies have examined the performance of existing constraint management methods (CMMs) in MAT. The present article focuses on the effectiveness of two promising heuristic CMMs in MAT for varying levels of imposed constraints and for various correlations between the measured dimensions. Through a simulation study, the multidimensional maximum priority index (MMPI) and multidimensional weighted penalty model (MWPM), as an extension of the weighted penalty model, are examined with regard to measurement precision and constraint violations. The results show that both CMMs are capable of addressing complex constraints in MAT. However, measurement precision losses were found to differ between the MMPI and MWPM. While the MMPI appears to be more suitable for use in assessment situations involving few to a moderate number of constraints, the MWPM should be used when numerous constraints are involved. </jats:p> |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
241 |
| container_title |
Educational and Psychological Measurement |
| container_volume |
77 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792333318032719879 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:10:49.485Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Heuristic+Constraint+Management+Methods+in+Multidimensional+Adaptive+Testing&rft.date=2017-04-01&genre=article&issn=1552-3888&volume=77&issue=2&spage=241&epage=262&pages=241-262&jtitle=Educational+and+Psychological+Measurement&atitle=Heuristic+Constraint+Management+Methods+in+Multidimensional+Adaptive+Testing&aulast=Frey&aufirst=Andreas&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1177%2F0013164416643744&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792333318032719879 |
| author | Born, Sebastian, Frey, Andreas |
| author_facet | Born, Sebastian, Frey, Andreas, Born, Sebastian, Frey, Andreas |
| author_sort | born, sebastian |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 241 |
| container_title | Educational and Psychological Measurement |
| container_volume | 77 |
| description | <jats:p> Although multidimensional adaptive testing (MAT) has been proven to be highly advantageous with regard to measurement efficiency when several highly correlated dimensions are measured, there are few operational assessments that use MAT. This may be due to issues of constraint management, which is more complex in MAT than it is in unidimensional adaptive testing. Very few studies have examined the performance of existing constraint management methods (CMMs) in MAT. The present article focuses on the effectiveness of two promising heuristic CMMs in MAT for varying levels of imposed constraints and for various correlations between the measured dimensions. Through a simulation study, the multidimensional maximum priority index (MMPI) and multidimensional weighted penalty model (MWPM), as an extension of the weighted penalty model, are examined with regard to measurement precision and constraint violations. The results show that both CMMs are capable of addressing complex constraints in MAT. However, measurement precision losses were found to differ between the MMPI and MWPM. While the MMPI appears to be more suitable for use in assessment situations involving few to a moderate number of constraints, the MWPM should be used when numerous constraints are involved. </jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0013164416643744 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Psychologie, Biologie, Pädagogik, Mathematik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3Ny8wMDEzMTY0NDE2NjQzNzQ0 |
| imprint | SAGE Publications, 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv | SAGE Publications, 2017 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 0013-1644, 1552-3888 |
| issn_str_mv | 0013-1644, 1552-3888 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:10:49.485Z |
| match_str | born2017heuristicconstraintmanagementmethodsinmultidimensionaladaptivetesting |
| mega_collection | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| physical | 241-262 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Educational and Psychological Measurement |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Born, Sebastian Frey, Andreas 0013-1644 1552-3888 SAGE Publications Applied Mathematics Applied Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164416643744 <jats:p> Although multidimensional adaptive testing (MAT) has been proven to be highly advantageous with regard to measurement efficiency when several highly correlated dimensions are measured, there are few operational assessments that use MAT. This may be due to issues of constraint management, which is more complex in MAT than it is in unidimensional adaptive testing. Very few studies have examined the performance of existing constraint management methods (CMMs) in MAT. The present article focuses on the effectiveness of two promising heuristic CMMs in MAT for varying levels of imposed constraints and for various correlations between the measured dimensions. Through a simulation study, the multidimensional maximum priority index (MMPI) and multidimensional weighted penalty model (MWPM), as an extension of the weighted penalty model, are examined with regard to measurement precision and constraint violations. The results show that both CMMs are capable of addressing complex constraints in MAT. However, measurement precision losses were found to differ between the MMPI and MWPM. While the MMPI appears to be more suitable for use in assessment situations involving few to a moderate number of constraints, the MWPM should be used when numerous constraints are involved. </jats:p> Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing Educational and Psychological Measurement |
| spellingShingle | Born, Sebastian, Frey, Andreas, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing, Applied Mathematics, Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education |
| title | Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_full | Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_fullStr | Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_short | Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| title_sort | heuristic constraint management methods in multidimensional adaptive testing |
| title_unstemmed | Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing |
| topic | Applied Mathematics, Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164416643744 |