Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Weather and Forecasting |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , , |
In: | Weather and Forecasting, 34, 2019, 2, S. 361-376 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
American Meteorological Society
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Guan, Hong Zhu, Yuejian Sinsky, Eric Li, Wei Zhou, Xiaqiong Hou, Dingchen Melhauser, Christopher Wobus, Richard Guan, Hong Zhu, Yuejian Sinsky, Eric Li, Wei Zhou, Xiaqiong Hou, Dingchen Melhauser, Christopher Wobus, Richard |
---|---|
author |
Guan, Hong Zhu, Yuejian Sinsky, Eric Li, Wei Zhou, Xiaqiong Hou, Dingchen Melhauser, Christopher Wobus, Richard |
spellingShingle |
Guan, Hong Zhu, Yuejian Sinsky, Eric Li, Wei Zhou, Xiaqiong Hou, Dingchen Melhauser, Christopher Wobus, Richard Weather and Forecasting Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project Atmospheric Science |
author_sort |
guan, hong |
spelling |
Guan, Hong Zhu, Yuejian Sinsky, Eric Li, Wei Zhou, Xiaqiong Hou, Dingchen Melhauser, Christopher Wobus, Richard 0882-8156 1520-0434 American Meteorological Society Atmospheric Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-18-0100.1 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The National Centers for Environmental Prediction have generated an 18-yr (1999–2016) subseasonal (weeks 3 and 4) reforecast to support the Climate Prediction Center’s operational mission. To create this reforecast, the subseasonal experiment version of the GEFS was run every Wednesday, initialized at 0000 UTC with 11 members. The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) served as the initial analyses for 1999–2010 and 2011–16, respectively. The analysis of 2-m temperature error demonstrates that the model has a strong warm bias over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and North America (NA) during the warm season. During the boreal winter, the 2-m temperature errors over NA exhibit large interannual and intraseasonal variability. For NA and the NH, weeks 3 and 4 errors are mostly saturated, with initial conditions having a negligible impact. Week 2 errors (day 11) are ~88.6% and 86.6% of their saturated levels, respectively. The 1999–2015 reforecast biases were used to calibrate the 2-m temperature forecasts in 2016, which reduces (increases) the systematic error (forecast skill) for NA, the NH, the Southern Hemisphere, and the tropics, with a maximum benefit for NA during the warm season. Overall, analysis adjustment for the CFSR period makes bias characteristics more consistent with the GDAS period over the NH and tropics and substantially improves the corresponding forecast skill levels. The calibration of the forecast using week 2 bias provides similar skill to using weeks 3 and 4 bias, promising the feasibility of using week 2 bias to calibrate the weeks 3 and 4 forecast. Our results also demonstrate that 10-yr reforecasts are an optimal training period. This is particularly beneficial considering limited computing resources.</jats:p> Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project Weather and Forecasting |
doi_str_mv |
10.1175/waf-d-18-0100.1 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Physik |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3NS93YWYtZC0xOC0wMTAwLjE |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3NS93YWYtZC0xOC0wMTAwLjE |
institution |
DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 |
imprint |
American Meteorological Society, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
American Meteorological Society, 2019 |
issn |
0882-8156 1520-0434 |
issn_str_mv |
0882-8156 1520-0434 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
American Meteorological Society (CrossRef) |
match_str |
guan2019systematicerroranalysisandcalibrationof2mtemperatureforthencepgefsreforecastofthesubseasonalexperimentsubxproject |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publisher |
American Meteorological Society |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Weather and Forecasting |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_unstemmed |
Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_full |
Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_fullStr |
Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_short |
Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_sort |
systematic error analysis and calibration of 2-m temperature for the ncep gefs reforecast of the subseasonal experiment (subx) project |
topic |
Atmospheric Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-18-0100.1 |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
361-376 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>The National Centers for Environmental Prediction have generated an 18-yr (1999–2016) subseasonal (weeks 3 and 4) reforecast to support the Climate Prediction Center’s operational mission. To create this reforecast, the subseasonal experiment version of the GEFS was run every Wednesday, initialized at 0000 UTC with 11 members. The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) served as the initial analyses for 1999–2010 and 2011–16, respectively. The analysis of 2-m temperature error demonstrates that the model has a strong warm bias over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and North America (NA) during the warm season. During the boreal winter, the 2-m temperature errors over NA exhibit large interannual and intraseasonal variability. For NA and the NH, weeks 3 and 4 errors are mostly saturated, with initial conditions having a negligible impact. Week 2 errors (day 11) are ~88.6% and 86.6% of their saturated levels, respectively. The 1999–2015 reforecast biases were used to calibrate the 2-m temperature forecasts in 2016, which reduces (increases) the systematic error (forecast skill) for NA, the NH, the Southern Hemisphere, and the tropics, with a maximum benefit for NA during the warm season. Overall, analysis adjustment for the CFSR period makes bias characteristics more consistent with the GDAS period over the NH and tropics and substantially improves the corresponding forecast skill levels. The calibration of the forecast using week 2 bias provides similar skill to using weeks 3 and 4 bias, promising the feasibility of using week 2 bias to calibrate the weeks 3 and 4 forecast. Our results also demonstrate that 10-yr reforecasts are an optimal training period. This is particularly beneficial considering limited computing resources.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
361 |
container_title |
Weather and Forecasting |
container_volume |
34 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792333136332324869 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:07:47.852Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Systematic+Error+Analysis+and+Calibration+of+2-m+Temperature+for+the+NCEP+GEFS+Reforecast+of+the+Subseasonal+Experiment+%28SubX%29+Project&rft.date=2019-04-01&genre=article&issn=1520-0434&volume=34&issue=2&spage=361&epage=376&pages=361-376&jtitle=Weather+and+Forecasting&atitle=Systematic+Error+Analysis+and+Calibration+of+2-m+Temperature+for+the+NCEP+GEFS+Reforecast+of+the+Subseasonal+Experiment+%28SubX%29+Project&aulast=Wobus&aufirst=Richard&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1175%2Fwaf-d-18-0100.1&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792333136332324869 |
author | Guan, Hong, Zhu, Yuejian, Sinsky, Eric, Li, Wei, Zhou, Xiaqiong, Hou, Dingchen, Melhauser, Christopher, Wobus, Richard |
author_facet | Guan, Hong, Zhu, Yuejian, Sinsky, Eric, Li, Wei, Zhou, Xiaqiong, Hou, Dingchen, Melhauser, Christopher, Wobus, Richard, Guan, Hong, Zhu, Yuejian, Sinsky, Eric, Li, Wei, Zhou, Xiaqiong, Hou, Dingchen, Melhauser, Christopher, Wobus, Richard |
author_sort | guan, hong |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 361 |
container_title | Weather and Forecasting |
container_volume | 34 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The National Centers for Environmental Prediction have generated an 18-yr (1999–2016) subseasonal (weeks 3 and 4) reforecast to support the Climate Prediction Center’s operational mission. To create this reforecast, the subseasonal experiment version of the GEFS was run every Wednesday, initialized at 0000 UTC with 11 members. The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) served as the initial analyses for 1999–2010 and 2011–16, respectively. The analysis of 2-m temperature error demonstrates that the model has a strong warm bias over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and North America (NA) during the warm season. During the boreal winter, the 2-m temperature errors over NA exhibit large interannual and intraseasonal variability. For NA and the NH, weeks 3 and 4 errors are mostly saturated, with initial conditions having a negligible impact. Week 2 errors (day 11) are ~88.6% and 86.6% of their saturated levels, respectively. The 1999–2015 reforecast biases were used to calibrate the 2-m temperature forecasts in 2016, which reduces (increases) the systematic error (forecast skill) for NA, the NH, the Southern Hemisphere, and the tropics, with a maximum benefit for NA during the warm season. Overall, analysis adjustment for the CFSR period makes bias characteristics more consistent with the GDAS period over the NH and tropics and substantially improves the corresponding forecast skill levels. The calibration of the forecast using week 2 bias provides similar skill to using weeks 3 and 4 bias, promising the feasibility of using week 2 bias to calibrate the weeks 3 and 4 forecast. Our results also demonstrate that 10-yr reforecasts are an optimal training period. This is particularly beneficial considering limited computing resources.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/waf-d-18-0100.1 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Physik |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE3NS93YWYtZC0xOC0wMTAwLjE |
imprint | American Meteorological Society, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv | American Meteorological Society, 2019 |
institution | DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14 |
issn | 0882-8156, 1520-0434 |
issn_str_mv | 0882-8156, 1520-0434 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:07:47.852Z |
match_str | guan2019systematicerroranalysisandcalibrationof2mtemperatureforthencepgefsreforecastofthesubseasonalexperimentsubxproject |
mega_collection | American Meteorological Society (CrossRef) |
physical | 361-376 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | American Meteorological Society |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Weather and Forecasting |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Guan, Hong Zhu, Yuejian Sinsky, Eric Li, Wei Zhou, Xiaqiong Hou, Dingchen Melhauser, Christopher Wobus, Richard 0882-8156 1520-0434 American Meteorological Society Atmospheric Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-18-0100.1 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The National Centers for Environmental Prediction have generated an 18-yr (1999–2016) subseasonal (weeks 3 and 4) reforecast to support the Climate Prediction Center’s operational mission. To create this reforecast, the subseasonal experiment version of the GEFS was run every Wednesday, initialized at 0000 UTC with 11 members. The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) served as the initial analyses for 1999–2010 and 2011–16, respectively. The analysis of 2-m temperature error demonstrates that the model has a strong warm bias over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and North America (NA) during the warm season. During the boreal winter, the 2-m temperature errors over NA exhibit large interannual and intraseasonal variability. For NA and the NH, weeks 3 and 4 errors are mostly saturated, with initial conditions having a negligible impact. Week 2 errors (day 11) are ~88.6% and 86.6% of their saturated levels, respectively. The 1999–2015 reforecast biases were used to calibrate the 2-m temperature forecasts in 2016, which reduces (increases) the systematic error (forecast skill) for NA, the NH, the Southern Hemisphere, and the tropics, with a maximum benefit for NA during the warm season. Overall, analysis adjustment for the CFSR period makes bias characteristics more consistent with the GDAS period over the NH and tropics and substantially improves the corresponding forecast skill levels. The calibration of the forecast using week 2 bias provides similar skill to using weeks 3 and 4 bias, promising the feasibility of using week 2 bias to calibrate the weeks 3 and 4 forecast. Our results also demonstrate that 10-yr reforecasts are an optimal training period. This is particularly beneficial considering limited computing resources.</jats:p> Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project Weather and Forecasting |
spellingShingle | Guan, Hong, Zhu, Yuejian, Sinsky, Eric, Li, Wei, Zhou, Xiaqiong, Hou, Dingchen, Melhauser, Christopher, Wobus, Richard, Weather and Forecasting, Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project, Atmospheric Science |
title | Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_full | Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_fullStr | Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_short | Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
title_sort | systematic error analysis and calibration of 2-m temperature for the ncep gefs reforecast of the subseasonal experiment (subx) project |
title_unstemmed | Systematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project |
topic | Atmospheric Science |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-18-0100.1 |