Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
E.T. Phoned Home…They Know
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Security and Human Rights |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Security and Human Rights, 28, 2018, 1-4, S. 92-112 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
veröffentlicht: |
Brill
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Huxtable, Holly Huxtable, Holly |
---|---|
author |
Huxtable, Holly |
spellingShingle |
Huxtable, Holly Security and Human Rights E.T. Phoned Home…They Know Law Political Science and International Relations |
author_sort |
huxtable, holly |
spelling |
Huxtable, Holly 1874-7337 1875-0230 Brill Law Political Science and International Relations http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801010 <jats:p>The rationale behind the applicability of human rights treaties to foreign surveillance is the subject of debate. Presented with the opportunity to weigh in on this issue in the case of <jats:italic>Big Brother Watch and Others v The United Kingdom</jats:italic>, the European Court of Human Rights simply assumed (and rightly so) that the European Convention on Human Rights applies, providing no further reasoning. This article explores the challenges that arise with establishing jurisdiction over foreign surveillance under human rights treaties, and argues for an alternative base for extraterritorial jurisdiction grounded in the moral and theoretical principles underlying the human rights regime.</jats:p> E.T. Phoned Home…They Know Security and Human Rights |
doi_str_mv |
10.1163/18750230-02801010 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Rechtswissenschaft Politologie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xODc1MDIzMC0wMjgwMTAxMA |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xODc1MDIzMC0wMjgwMTAxMA |
institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
imprint |
Brill, 2018 |
imprint_str_mv |
Brill, 2018 |
issn |
1874-7337 1875-0230 |
issn_str_mv |
1874-7337 1875-0230 |
language |
Undetermined |
mega_collection |
Brill (CrossRef) |
match_str |
huxtable2018etphonedhometheyknow |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
publisher |
Brill |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Security and Human Rights |
source_id |
49 |
title |
E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_unstemmed |
E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_full |
E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_fullStr |
E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_full_unstemmed |
E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_short |
E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_sort |
e.t. phoned home…they know |
topic |
Law Political Science and International Relations |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801010 |
publishDate |
2018 |
physical |
92-112 |
description |
<jats:p>The rationale behind the applicability of human rights treaties to foreign surveillance is the subject of debate. Presented with the opportunity to weigh in on this issue in the case of <jats:italic>Big Brother Watch and Others v The United Kingdom</jats:italic>, the European Court of Human Rights simply assumed (and rightly so) that the European Convention on Human Rights applies, providing no further reasoning. This article explores the challenges that arise with establishing jurisdiction over foreign surveillance under human rights treaties, and argues for an alternative base for extraterritorial jurisdiction grounded in the moral and theoretical principles underlying the human rights regime.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1-4 |
container_start_page |
92 |
container_title |
Security and Human Rights |
container_volume |
28 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792326491450638338 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T12:22:21.053Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=E.T.+Phoned+Home%E2%80%A6They+Know&rft.date=2018-04-01&genre=article&issn=1875-0230&volume=28&issue=1-4&spage=92&epage=112&pages=92-112&jtitle=Security+and+Human+Rights&atitle=E.T.+Phoned+Home%E2%80%A6They+Know&aulast=Huxtable&aufirst=Holly&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1163%2F18750230-02801010&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792326491450638338 |
author | Huxtable, Holly |
author_facet | Huxtable, Holly, Huxtable, Holly |
author_sort | huxtable, holly |
container_issue | 1-4 |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Security and Human Rights |
container_volume | 28 |
description | <jats:p>The rationale behind the applicability of human rights treaties to foreign surveillance is the subject of debate. Presented with the opportunity to weigh in on this issue in the case of <jats:italic>Big Brother Watch and Others v The United Kingdom</jats:italic>, the European Court of Human Rights simply assumed (and rightly so) that the European Convention on Human Rights applies, providing no further reasoning. This article explores the challenges that arise with establishing jurisdiction over foreign surveillance under human rights treaties, and argues for an alternative base for extraterritorial jurisdiction grounded in the moral and theoretical principles underlying the human rights regime.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/18750230-02801010 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Rechtswissenschaft, Politologie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xODc1MDIzMC0wMjgwMTAxMA |
imprint | Brill, 2018 |
imprint_str_mv | Brill, 2018 |
institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
issn | 1874-7337, 1875-0230 |
issn_str_mv | 1874-7337, 1875-0230 |
language | Undetermined |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T12:22:21.053Z |
match_str | huxtable2018etphonedhometheyknow |
mega_collection | Brill (CrossRef) |
physical | 92-112 |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | Brill |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Security and Human Rights |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Huxtable, Holly 1874-7337 1875-0230 Brill Law Political Science and International Relations http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801010 <jats:p>The rationale behind the applicability of human rights treaties to foreign surveillance is the subject of debate. Presented with the opportunity to weigh in on this issue in the case of <jats:italic>Big Brother Watch and Others v The United Kingdom</jats:italic>, the European Court of Human Rights simply assumed (and rightly so) that the European Convention on Human Rights applies, providing no further reasoning. This article explores the challenges that arise with establishing jurisdiction over foreign surveillance under human rights treaties, and argues for an alternative base for extraterritorial jurisdiction grounded in the moral and theoretical principles underlying the human rights regime.</jats:p> E.T. Phoned Home…They Know Security and Human Rights |
spellingShingle | Huxtable, Holly, Security and Human Rights, E.T. Phoned Home…They Know, Law, Political Science and International Relations |
title | E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_full | E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_fullStr | E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_full_unstemmed | E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_short | E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
title_sort | e.t. phoned home…they know |
title_unstemmed | E.T. Phoned Home…They Know |
topic | Law, Political Science and International Relations |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801010 |