Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce...
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Security and Human Rights |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
In: | Security and Human Rights, 28, 2018, 1-4, S. 180-213 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
veröffentlicht: |
Brill
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Musayev, Tofig F. Sadigbayli, Rovshan Musayev, Tofig F. Sadigbayli, Rovshan |
---|---|
author |
Musayev, Tofig F. Sadigbayli, Rovshan |
spellingShingle |
Musayev, Tofig F. Sadigbayli, Rovshan Security and Human Rights The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area Law Political Science and International Relations |
author_sort |
musayev, tofig f. |
spelling |
Musayev, Tofig F. Sadigbayli, Rovshan 1874-7337 1875-0230 Brill Law Political Science and International Relations http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801006 <jats:p>The article reviews the purposes and principles of the <jats:sc>u.n.</jats:sc> Charter in light of persistent claims voiced in the context of protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. The drafting history of the Charter indicate that States did not recognise a right to unilateral secession of a part of population of a State as a means of exercising self-determination. Subsequent development of this principle in law and in practice in the decades after the adoption of the Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. Invalidation at the international level of secessionist claims and actions, collective non-recognition of the resulting situations and abstention from aid or assistance that contributes to their consolidation are among legal and political consequences that have been applied and need to be consistently maintained with regard to the protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area and their settlement processes.</jats:p> The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area Security and Human Rights |
doi_str_mv |
10.1163/18750230-02801006 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Rechtswissenschaft Politologie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xODc1MDIzMC0wMjgwMTAwNg |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xODc1MDIzMC0wMjgwMTAwNg |
institution |
DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 |
imprint |
Brill, 2018 |
imprint_str_mv |
Brill, 2018 |
issn |
1874-7337 1875-0230 |
issn_str_mv |
1874-7337 1875-0230 |
language |
Undetermined |
mega_collection |
Brill (CrossRef) |
match_str |
musayev2018thepurposesandprinciplesoftheuncharteroriginssubsequentdevelopmentsinlawandpracticeandmisinterpretationinthecontextofunilateralsecessionclaimsintheoscearea |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
publisher |
Brill |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Security and Human Rights |
source_id |
49 |
title |
The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_unstemmed |
The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_full |
The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_fullStr |
The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_short |
The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_sort |
the purposes and principles of the un charter origins, subsequent developments in law and practice and (mis)interpretation in the context of unilateral secession claims in the osce area |
topic |
Law Political Science and International Relations |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801006 |
publishDate |
2018 |
physical |
180-213 |
description |
<jats:p>The article reviews the purposes and principles of the <jats:sc>u.n.</jats:sc> Charter in light of persistent claims voiced in the context of protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. The drafting history of the Charter indicate that States did not recognise a right to unilateral secession of a part of population of a State as a means of exercising self-determination. Subsequent development of this principle in law and in practice in the decades after the adoption of the Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. Invalidation at the international level of secessionist claims and actions, collective non-recognition of the resulting situations and abstention from aid or assistance that contributes to their consolidation are among legal and political consequences that have been applied and need to be consistently maintained with regard to the protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area and their settlement processes.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1-4 |
container_start_page |
180 |
container_title |
Security and Human Rights |
container_volume |
28 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792323389501734913 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T11:33:02.767Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+Purposes+and+Principles+of+the+un+Charter+Origins%2C+Subsequent+Developments+in+Law+and+Practice+and+%28Mis%29interpretation+in+the+Context+of+Unilateral+Secession+Claims+in+the+osce+Area&rft.date=2018-04-01&genre=article&issn=1875-0230&volume=28&issue=1-4&spage=180&epage=213&pages=180-213&jtitle=Security+and+Human+Rights&atitle=The+Purposes+and+Principles+of+the+un+Charter+Origins%2C+Subsequent+Developments+in+Law+and+Practice+and+%28Mis%29interpretation+in+the+Context+of+Unilateral+Secession+Claims+in+the+osce+Area&aulast=Sadigbayli&aufirst=Rovshan&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1163%2F18750230-02801006&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792323389501734913 |
author | Musayev, Tofig F., Sadigbayli, Rovshan |
author_facet | Musayev, Tofig F., Sadigbayli, Rovshan, Musayev, Tofig F., Sadigbayli, Rovshan |
author_sort | musayev, tofig f. |
container_issue | 1-4 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | Security and Human Rights |
container_volume | 28 |
description | <jats:p>The article reviews the purposes and principles of the <jats:sc>u.n.</jats:sc> Charter in light of persistent claims voiced in the context of protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. The drafting history of the Charter indicate that States did not recognise a right to unilateral secession of a part of population of a State as a means of exercising self-determination. Subsequent development of this principle in law and in practice in the decades after the adoption of the Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. Invalidation at the international level of secessionist claims and actions, collective non-recognition of the resulting situations and abstention from aid or assistance that contributes to their consolidation are among legal and political consequences that have been applied and need to be consistently maintained with regard to the protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area and their settlement processes.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/18750230-02801006 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Rechtswissenschaft, Politologie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xODc1MDIzMC0wMjgwMTAwNg |
imprint | Brill, 2018 |
imprint_str_mv | Brill, 2018 |
institution | DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1 |
issn | 1874-7337, 1875-0230 |
issn_str_mv | 1874-7337, 1875-0230 |
language | Undetermined |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T11:33:02.767Z |
match_str | musayev2018thepurposesandprinciplesoftheuncharteroriginssubsequentdevelopmentsinlawandpracticeandmisinterpretationinthecontextofunilateralsecessionclaimsintheoscearea |
mega_collection | Brill (CrossRef) |
physical | 180-213 |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | Brill |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Security and Human Rights |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Musayev, Tofig F. Sadigbayli, Rovshan 1874-7337 1875-0230 Brill Law Political Science and International Relations http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801006 <jats:p>The article reviews the purposes and principles of the <jats:sc>u.n.</jats:sc> Charter in light of persistent claims voiced in the context of protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. The drafting history of the Charter indicate that States did not recognise a right to unilateral secession of a part of population of a State as a means of exercising self-determination. Subsequent development of this principle in law and in practice in the decades after the adoption of the Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. Invalidation at the international level of secessionist claims and actions, collective non-recognition of the resulting situations and abstention from aid or assistance that contributes to their consolidation are among legal and political consequences that have been applied and need to be consistently maintained with regard to the protracted conflicts in the <jats:sc>osce</jats:sc> area and their settlement processes.</jats:p> The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area Security and Human Rights |
spellingShingle | Musayev, Tofig F., Sadigbayli, Rovshan, Security and Human Rights, The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area, Law, Political Science and International Relations |
title | The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_full | The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_fullStr | The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_full_unstemmed | The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_short | The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
title_sort | the purposes and principles of the un charter origins, subsequent developments in law and practice and (mis)interpretation in the context of unilateral secession claims in the osce area |
title_unstemmed | The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area |
topic | Law, Political Science and International Relations |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801006 |