author_facet Lamsam, Layton
Sussman, Eric S.
Iyer, Aditya K.
Bhambhvani, Hriday P.
Han, Summer S.
Skirboll, Stephen
Ratliff, John K.
Lamsam, Layton
Sussman, Eric S.
Iyer, Aditya K.
Bhambhvani, Hriday P.
Han, Summer S.
Skirboll, Stephen
Ratliff, John K.
author Lamsam, Layton
Sussman, Eric S.
Iyer, Aditya K.
Bhambhvani, Hriday P.
Han, Summer S.
Skirboll, Stephen
Ratliff, John K.
spellingShingle Lamsam, Layton
Sussman, Eric S.
Iyer, Aditya K.
Bhambhvani, Hriday P.
Han, Summer S.
Skirboll, Stephen
Ratliff, John K.
Stroke
Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
Advanced and Specialized Nursing
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Neurology (clinical)
author_sort lamsam, layton
spelling Lamsam, Layton Sussman, Eric S. Iyer, Aditya K. Bhambhvani, Hriday P. Han, Summer S. Skirboll, Stephen Ratliff, John K. 0039-2499 1524-4628 Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Advanced and Specialized Nursing Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Neurology (clinical) http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.022156 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and Purpose—</jats:title> <jats:p>Deep vein thrombosis (DVTs) is a common disease with high morbidity if it progresses to pulmonary embolus (PE). Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice; warfarin has long been the standard of care. Early experience with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) suggests that these agents may be may be a safer and equally effective alternative in the treatment of DVT/PE. Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most devastating potential complications of anticoagulation therapy. We sought to compare the rates of ICH in patients treated with DOACs versus those treated with warfarin for DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods—</jats:title> <jats:p>The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental databases were used. Adult DVT/PE patients without known atrial fibrillation and with prescriptions for either a DOAC or warfarin were followed for the occurrence of inpatient admission for ICH. Coarsened exact matching was used to balance the treatment cohorts. Cox proportional-hazards regressions and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the association between DOACs and the risk of ICH compared with warfarin.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results—</jats:title> <jats:p> The combined cohort of 218 620 patients had a median follow-up of 3.0 months, mean age of 55.4 years, and was 52.1% women. The DOAC cohort had 26 980 patients and 8 ICH events (1.0 cases per 1000 person-years), and the warfarin cohort had 191 640 patients and 324 ICH events (3.3 cases per 1000 person-years; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001). The DOAC cohort had a lower hazard ratio for ICH compared with warfarin in both the unmatched (hazard ratio=0.26; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0002) and matched (hazard ratio=0.20; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0001) Cox proportional-hazards regressions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions—</jats:title> <jats:p>DOACs show superior safety to warfarin in terms of risk of ICH in patients with DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Stroke
doi_str_mv 10.1161/strokeaha.118.022156
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2MS9zdHJva2VhaGEuMTE4LjAyMjE1Ng
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2MS9zdHJva2VhaGEuMTE4LjAyMjE1Ng
institution DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Zwi2
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
imprint Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018
imprint_str_mv Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018
issn 0039-2499
1524-4628
issn_str_mv 0039-2499
1524-4628
language English
mega_collection Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (CrossRef)
match_str lamsam2018intracranialhemorrhageindeepveinthrombosispulmonaryemboluspatientswithoutatrialfibrillationdirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarindirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarin
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Stroke
source_id 49
title_sub Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_unstemmed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_full Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_fullStr Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_short Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_sort intracranial hemorrhage in deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus patients without atrial fibrillation : direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin
topic Advanced and Specialized Nursing
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Neurology (clinical)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.022156
publishDate 2018
physical 1866-1871
description <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and Purpose—</jats:title> <jats:p>Deep vein thrombosis (DVTs) is a common disease with high morbidity if it progresses to pulmonary embolus (PE). Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice; warfarin has long been the standard of care. Early experience with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) suggests that these agents may be may be a safer and equally effective alternative in the treatment of DVT/PE. Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most devastating potential complications of anticoagulation therapy. We sought to compare the rates of ICH in patients treated with DOACs versus those treated with warfarin for DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods—</jats:title> <jats:p>The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental databases were used. Adult DVT/PE patients without known atrial fibrillation and with prescriptions for either a DOAC or warfarin were followed for the occurrence of inpatient admission for ICH. Coarsened exact matching was used to balance the treatment cohorts. Cox proportional-hazards regressions and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the association between DOACs and the risk of ICH compared with warfarin.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results—</jats:title> <jats:p> The combined cohort of 218 620 patients had a median follow-up of 3.0 months, mean age of 55.4 years, and was 52.1% women. The DOAC cohort had 26 980 patients and 8 ICH events (1.0 cases per 1000 person-years), and the warfarin cohort had 191 640 patients and 324 ICH events (3.3 cases per 1000 person-years; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001). The DOAC cohort had a lower hazard ratio for ICH compared with warfarin in both the unmatched (hazard ratio=0.26; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0002) and matched (hazard ratio=0.20; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0001) Cox proportional-hazards regressions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions—</jats:title> <jats:p>DOACs show superior safety to warfarin in terms of risk of ICH in patients with DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1866
container_title Stroke
container_volume 49
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792341686599286788
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:23:51.438Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Intracranial+Hemorrhage+in+Deep+Vein+Thrombosis%2FPulmonary+Embolus+Patients+Without+Atrial+Fibrillation+%3A+Direct+Oral+Anticoagulants+Versus+Warfarin&rft.date=2018-08-01&genre=article&issn=1524-4628&volume=49&issue=8&spage=1866&epage=1871&pages=1866-1871&jtitle=Stroke&atitle=Intracranial+Hemorrhage+in+Deep+Vein+Thrombosis%2FPulmonary+Embolus+Patients+Without+Atrial+Fibrillation+%3A+Direct+Oral+Anticoagulants+Versus+Warfarin&aulast=Ratliff&aufirst=John+K.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1161%2Fstrokeaha.118.022156&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792341686599286788
author Lamsam, Layton, Sussman, Eric S., Iyer, Aditya K., Bhambhvani, Hriday P., Han, Summer S., Skirboll, Stephen, Ratliff, John K.
author_facet Lamsam, Layton, Sussman, Eric S., Iyer, Aditya K., Bhambhvani, Hriday P., Han, Summer S., Skirboll, Stephen, Ratliff, John K., Lamsam, Layton, Sussman, Eric S., Iyer, Aditya K., Bhambhvani, Hriday P., Han, Summer S., Skirboll, Stephen, Ratliff, John K.
author_sort lamsam, layton
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1866
container_title Stroke
container_volume 49
description <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and Purpose—</jats:title> <jats:p>Deep vein thrombosis (DVTs) is a common disease with high morbidity if it progresses to pulmonary embolus (PE). Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice; warfarin has long been the standard of care. Early experience with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) suggests that these agents may be may be a safer and equally effective alternative in the treatment of DVT/PE. Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most devastating potential complications of anticoagulation therapy. We sought to compare the rates of ICH in patients treated with DOACs versus those treated with warfarin for DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods—</jats:title> <jats:p>The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental databases were used. Adult DVT/PE patients without known atrial fibrillation and with prescriptions for either a DOAC or warfarin were followed for the occurrence of inpatient admission for ICH. Coarsened exact matching was used to balance the treatment cohorts. Cox proportional-hazards regressions and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the association between DOACs and the risk of ICH compared with warfarin.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results—</jats:title> <jats:p> The combined cohort of 218 620 patients had a median follow-up of 3.0 months, mean age of 55.4 years, and was 52.1% women. The DOAC cohort had 26 980 patients and 8 ICH events (1.0 cases per 1000 person-years), and the warfarin cohort had 191 640 patients and 324 ICH events (3.3 cases per 1000 person-years; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001). The DOAC cohort had a lower hazard ratio for ICH compared with warfarin in both the unmatched (hazard ratio=0.26; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0002) and matched (hazard ratio=0.20; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0001) Cox proportional-hazards regressions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions—</jats:title> <jats:p>DOACs show superior safety to warfarin in terms of risk of ICH in patients with DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1161/strokeaha.118.022156
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2MS9zdHJva2VhaGEuMTE4LjAyMjE1Ng
imprint Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018
imprint_str_mv Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018
institution DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1
issn 0039-2499, 1524-4628
issn_str_mv 0039-2499, 1524-4628
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:23:51.438Z
match_str lamsam2018intracranialhemorrhageindeepveinthrombosispulmonaryemboluspatientswithoutatrialfibrillationdirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarindirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarin
mega_collection Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (CrossRef)
physical 1866-1871
publishDate 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Stroke
source_id 49
spelling Lamsam, Layton Sussman, Eric S. Iyer, Aditya K. Bhambhvani, Hriday P. Han, Summer S. Skirboll, Stephen Ratliff, John K. 0039-2499 1524-4628 Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Advanced and Specialized Nursing Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Neurology (clinical) http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.022156 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and Purpose—</jats:title> <jats:p>Deep vein thrombosis (DVTs) is a common disease with high morbidity if it progresses to pulmonary embolus (PE). Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice; warfarin has long been the standard of care. Early experience with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) suggests that these agents may be may be a safer and equally effective alternative in the treatment of DVT/PE. Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most devastating potential complications of anticoagulation therapy. We sought to compare the rates of ICH in patients treated with DOACs versus those treated with warfarin for DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods—</jats:title> <jats:p>The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental databases were used. Adult DVT/PE patients without known atrial fibrillation and with prescriptions for either a DOAC or warfarin were followed for the occurrence of inpatient admission for ICH. Coarsened exact matching was used to balance the treatment cohorts. Cox proportional-hazards regressions and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the association between DOACs and the risk of ICH compared with warfarin.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results—</jats:title> <jats:p> The combined cohort of 218 620 patients had a median follow-up of 3.0 months, mean age of 55.4 years, and was 52.1% women. The DOAC cohort had 26 980 patients and 8 ICH events (1.0 cases per 1000 person-years), and the warfarin cohort had 191 640 patients and 324 ICH events (3.3 cases per 1000 person-years; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001). The DOAC cohort had a lower hazard ratio for ICH compared with warfarin in both the unmatched (hazard ratio=0.26; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0002) and matched (hazard ratio=0.20; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.0001) Cox proportional-hazards regressions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions—</jats:title> <jats:p>DOACs show superior safety to warfarin in terms of risk of ICH in patients with DVT/PE.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Stroke
spellingShingle Lamsam, Layton, Sussman, Eric S., Iyer, Aditya K., Bhambhvani, Hriday P., Han, Summer S., Skirboll, Stephen, Ratliff, John K., Stroke, Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin, Advanced and Specialized Nursing, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Neurology (clinical)
title Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_full Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_fullStr Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_short Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_sort intracranial hemorrhage in deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus patients without atrial fibrillation : direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin
title_sub Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
title_unstemmed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolus Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation : Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin
topic Advanced and Specialized Nursing, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Neurology (clinical)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.022156