Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , |
| In: | Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012, 2012, S. 1-7 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Hindawi Limited
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Kang, Deying Wu, Yuxia Hu, Dan Hong, Qi Wang, Jialiang Zhang, Xin Kang, Deying Wu, Yuxia Hu, Dan Hong, Qi Wang, Jialiang Zhang, Xin |
|---|---|
| author |
Kang, Deying Wu, Yuxia Hu, Dan Hong, Qi Wang, Jialiang Zhang, Xin |
| spellingShingle |
Kang, Deying Wu, Yuxia Hu, Dan Hong, Qi Wang, Jialiang Zhang, Xin Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews Complementary and alternative medicine |
| author_sort |
kang, deying |
| spelling |
Kang, Deying Wu, Yuxia Hu, Dan Hong, Qi Wang, Jialiang Zhang, Xin 1741-427X 1741-4288 Hindawi Limited Complementary and alternative medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/732195 <jats:p><jats:italic>Objective</jats:italic>. The aim of this study is to measure the reliability and external validity of AMSTAR by applying it to a sample of TCM systematic reviews.<jats:italic>Study Design and Methods</jats:italic>. We tested the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of AMSTAR through comparisons with OQAQ. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 13.0.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. A random of sample with 41 TCM systematic reviews was selected from a database. The interrater agreement of the individual items of AMSTAR was moderate with a mean kappa of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.73). The ICC for AMSTAR against OQAQ (total score of 9 items, excluding item 10) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.93).<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. Although there is room for improvement on few items, the new tool is reliable, valid, and easy to use for methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews on TCM.</jats:p> Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1155/2012/732195 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1NS8yMDEyLzczMjE5NQ |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1NS8yMDEyLzczMjE5NQ |
| institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
Hindawi Limited, 2012 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Hindawi Limited, 2012 |
| issn |
1741-427X 1741-4288 |
| issn_str_mv |
1741-427X 1741-4288 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Hindawi Limited (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
kang2012reliabilityandexternalvalidityofamstarinassessingqualityoftcmsystematicreviews |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_unstemmed |
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_full |
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_fullStr |
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_short |
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_sort |
reliability and external validity of amstar in assessing quality of tcm systematic reviews |
| topic |
Complementary and alternative medicine |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/732195 |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| physical |
1-7 |
| description |
<jats:p><jats:italic>Objective</jats:italic>. The aim of this study is to measure the reliability and external validity of AMSTAR by applying it to a sample of TCM systematic reviews.<jats:italic>Study Design and Methods</jats:italic>. We tested the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of AMSTAR through comparisons with OQAQ. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 13.0.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. A random of sample with 41 TCM systematic reviews was selected from a database. The interrater agreement of the individual items of AMSTAR was moderate with a mean kappa of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.73). The ICC for AMSTAR against OQAQ (total score of 9 items, excluding item 10) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.93).<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. Although there is room for improvement on few items, the new tool is reliable, valid, and easy to use for methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews on TCM.</jats:p> |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| container_title |
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| container_volume |
2012 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792334691097903121 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:32:39.904Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Reliability+and+External+Validity+of+AMSTAR+in+Assessing+Quality+of+TCM+Systematic+Reviews&rft.date=2012-01-01&genre=article&issn=1741-4288&volume=2012&spage=1&epage=7&pages=1-7&jtitle=Evidence-Based+Complementary+and+Alternative+Medicine&atitle=Reliability+and+External+Validity+of+AMSTAR+in+Assessing+Quality+of+TCM+Systematic+Reviews&aulast=Zhang&aufirst=Xin&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1155%2F2012%2F732195&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792334691097903121 |
| author | Kang, Deying, Wu, Yuxia, Hu, Dan, Hong, Qi, Wang, Jialiang, Zhang, Xin |
| author_facet | Kang, Deying, Wu, Yuxia, Hu, Dan, Hong, Qi, Wang, Jialiang, Zhang, Xin, Kang, Deying, Wu, Yuxia, Hu, Dan, Hong, Qi, Wang, Jialiang, Zhang, Xin |
| author_sort | kang, deying |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| container_volume | 2012 |
| description | <jats:p><jats:italic>Objective</jats:italic>. The aim of this study is to measure the reliability and external validity of AMSTAR by applying it to a sample of TCM systematic reviews.<jats:italic>Study Design and Methods</jats:italic>. We tested the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of AMSTAR through comparisons with OQAQ. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 13.0.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. A random of sample with 41 TCM systematic reviews was selected from a database. The interrater agreement of the individual items of AMSTAR was moderate with a mean kappa of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.73). The ICC for AMSTAR against OQAQ (total score of 9 items, excluding item 10) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.93).<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. Although there is room for improvement on few items, the new tool is reliable, valid, and easy to use for methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews on TCM.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2012/732195 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1NS8yMDEyLzczMjE5NQ |
| imprint | Hindawi Limited, 2012 |
| imprint_str_mv | Hindawi Limited, 2012 |
| institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161 |
| issn | 1741-427X, 1741-4288 |
| issn_str_mv | 1741-427X, 1741-4288 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:32:39.904Z |
| match_str | kang2012reliabilityandexternalvalidityofamstarinassessingqualityoftcmsystematicreviews |
| mega_collection | Hindawi Limited (CrossRef) |
| physical | 1-7 |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Hindawi Limited |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Kang, Deying Wu, Yuxia Hu, Dan Hong, Qi Wang, Jialiang Zhang, Xin 1741-427X 1741-4288 Hindawi Limited Complementary and alternative medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/732195 <jats:p><jats:italic>Objective</jats:italic>. The aim of this study is to measure the reliability and external validity of AMSTAR by applying it to a sample of TCM systematic reviews.<jats:italic>Study Design and Methods</jats:italic>. We tested the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of AMSTAR through comparisons with OQAQ. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 13.0.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. A random of sample with 41 TCM systematic reviews was selected from a database. The interrater agreement of the individual items of AMSTAR was moderate with a mean kappa of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.73). The ICC for AMSTAR against OQAQ (total score of 9 items, excluding item 10) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.93).<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. Although there is room for improvement on few items, the new tool is reliable, valid, and easy to use for methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews on TCM.</jats:p> Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| spellingShingle | Kang, Deying, Wu, Yuxia, Hu, Dan, Hong, Qi, Wang, Jialiang, Zhang, Xin, Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews, Complementary and alternative medicine |
| title | Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_full | Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_fullStr | Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_short | Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| title_sort | reliability and external validity of amstar in assessing quality of tcm systematic reviews |
| title_unstemmed | Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews |
| topic | Complementary and alternative medicine |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/732195 |