author_facet Klaver, S.
Joniau, S.
Van Poppel, H.
Klaver, S.
Joniau, S.
Van Poppel, H.
author Klaver, S.
Joniau, S.
Van Poppel, H.
spellingShingle Klaver, S.
Joniau, S.
Van Poppel, H.
Advances in Urology
Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
Urology
Obstetrics and Gynecology
author_sort klaver, s.
spelling Klaver, S. Joniau, S. Van Poppel, H. 1687-6369 1687-6377 Hindawi Limited Urology Obstetrics and Gynecology http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/705958 <jats:p><jats:italic>Objectives</jats:italic>. To review the natural history and biological potential of small renal masses in order to evaluate surveillance as a treatment option.<jats:italic>Methods</jats:italic>. Literature search of Medline and additional references from non-Medline-indexed publications concerning surveillance of small renal masses.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. The natural history and biological potential of small renal masses can still not be unambiguously predicted at present. There seems to be no clear correlation between tumour size and presence of benign histology. The majority of small renal masses grow and the majority are cancer, but one cannot safely assume that a lack of growth on serial CT scans is the confirmation of absence of malignancy. Needle core biopsies could be used to help in decision making. They show a high accuracy for histopathological tumour type but are less accurate in evaluating Fuhrman grade.<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. At present, surveillance of small renal masses should only be considered in elderly and/or infirm patients with competing health risks, in those with a limited life expectancy, and in those for whom minimal invasive treatment or surgery is not an option. In all other patients, active surveillance should only be considered in the context of a study protocol. Long-term, prospective studies are needed to provide a more accurate assessment of the natural history and metastastic potential of small renal masses.</jats:p> Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses Advances in Urology
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2008/705958
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1NS8yMDA4LzcwNTk1OA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1NS8yMDA4LzcwNTk1OA
institution DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
imprint Hindawi Limited, 2008
imprint_str_mv Hindawi Limited, 2008
issn 1687-6369
1687-6377
issn_str_mv 1687-6369
1687-6377
language English
mega_collection Hindawi Limited (CrossRef)
match_str klaver2008surveillanceasanoptionforthetreatmentofsmallrenalmasses
publishDateSort 2008
publisher Hindawi Limited
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Advances in Urology
source_id 49
title Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_unstemmed Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_full Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_fullStr Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_short Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_sort surveillance as an option for the treatment of small renal masses
topic Urology
Obstetrics and Gynecology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/705958
publishDate 2008
physical 1-6
description <jats:p><jats:italic>Objectives</jats:italic>. To review the natural history and biological potential of small renal masses in order to evaluate surveillance as a treatment option.<jats:italic>Methods</jats:italic>. Literature search of Medline and additional references from non-Medline-indexed publications concerning surveillance of small renal masses.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. The natural history and biological potential of small renal masses can still not be unambiguously predicted at present. There seems to be no clear correlation between tumour size and presence of benign histology. The majority of small renal masses grow and the majority are cancer, but one cannot safely assume that a lack of growth on serial CT scans is the confirmation of absence of malignancy. Needle core biopsies could be used to help in decision making. They show a high accuracy for histopathological tumour type but are less accurate in evaluating Fuhrman grade.<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. At present, surveillance of small renal masses should only be considered in elderly and/or infirm patients with competing health risks, in those with a limited life expectancy, and in those for whom minimal invasive treatment or surgery is not an option. In all other patients, active surveillance should only be considered in the context of a study protocol. Long-term, prospective studies are needed to provide a more accurate assessment of the natural history and metastastic potential of small renal masses.</jats:p>
container_start_page 1
container_title Advances in Urology
container_volume 2008
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792320793331367948
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T10:51:47.215Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Surveillance+as+an+Option+for+the+Treatment+of+Small+Renal+Masses&rft.date=2008-01-01&genre=article&issn=1687-6377&volume=2008&spage=1&epage=6&pages=1-6&jtitle=Advances+in+Urology&atitle=Surveillance+as+an+Option+for+the+Treatment+of+Small+Renal+Masses&aulast=Van+Poppel&aufirst=H.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1155%2F2008%2F705958&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792320793331367948
author Klaver, S., Joniau, S., Van Poppel, H.
author_facet Klaver, S., Joniau, S., Van Poppel, H., Klaver, S., Joniau, S., Van Poppel, H.
author_sort klaver, s.
container_start_page 1
container_title Advances in Urology
container_volume 2008
description <jats:p><jats:italic>Objectives</jats:italic>. To review the natural history and biological potential of small renal masses in order to evaluate surveillance as a treatment option.<jats:italic>Methods</jats:italic>. Literature search of Medline and additional references from non-Medline-indexed publications concerning surveillance of small renal masses.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. The natural history and biological potential of small renal masses can still not be unambiguously predicted at present. There seems to be no clear correlation between tumour size and presence of benign histology. The majority of small renal masses grow and the majority are cancer, but one cannot safely assume that a lack of growth on serial CT scans is the confirmation of absence of malignancy. Needle core biopsies could be used to help in decision making. They show a high accuracy for histopathological tumour type but are less accurate in evaluating Fuhrman grade.<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. At present, surveillance of small renal masses should only be considered in elderly and/or infirm patients with competing health risks, in those with a limited life expectancy, and in those for whom minimal invasive treatment or surgery is not an option. In all other patients, active surveillance should only be considered in the context of a study protocol. Long-term, prospective studies are needed to provide a more accurate assessment of the natural history and metastastic potential of small renal masses.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2008/705958
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1NS8yMDA4LzcwNTk1OA
imprint Hindawi Limited, 2008
imprint_str_mv Hindawi Limited, 2008
institution DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1
issn 1687-6369, 1687-6377
issn_str_mv 1687-6369, 1687-6377
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T10:51:47.215Z
match_str klaver2008surveillanceasanoptionforthetreatmentofsmallrenalmasses
mega_collection Hindawi Limited (CrossRef)
physical 1-6
publishDate 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Advances in Urology
source_id 49
spelling Klaver, S. Joniau, S. Van Poppel, H. 1687-6369 1687-6377 Hindawi Limited Urology Obstetrics and Gynecology http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/705958 <jats:p><jats:italic>Objectives</jats:italic>. To review the natural history and biological potential of small renal masses in order to evaluate surveillance as a treatment option.<jats:italic>Methods</jats:italic>. Literature search of Medline and additional references from non-Medline-indexed publications concerning surveillance of small renal masses.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. The natural history and biological potential of small renal masses can still not be unambiguously predicted at present. There seems to be no clear correlation between tumour size and presence of benign histology. The majority of small renal masses grow and the majority are cancer, but one cannot safely assume that a lack of growth on serial CT scans is the confirmation of absence of malignancy. Needle core biopsies could be used to help in decision making. They show a high accuracy for histopathological tumour type but are less accurate in evaluating Fuhrman grade.<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>. At present, surveillance of small renal masses should only be considered in elderly and/or infirm patients with competing health risks, in those with a limited life expectancy, and in those for whom minimal invasive treatment or surgery is not an option. In all other patients, active surveillance should only be considered in the context of a study protocol. Long-term, prospective studies are needed to provide a more accurate assessment of the natural history and metastastic potential of small renal masses.</jats:p> Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses Advances in Urology
spellingShingle Klaver, S., Joniau, S., Van Poppel, H., Advances in Urology, Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses, Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology
title Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_full Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_fullStr Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_short Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
title_sort surveillance as an option for the treatment of small renal masses
title_unstemmed Surveillance as an Option for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
topic Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/705958