author_facet Ryan, Jonathan C.
Smith, Laurence C.
Wu, Mengxi
Cooley, Sarah W.
Miège, Clément
Montgomery, Lynn N.
Koenig, Lora S.
Fettweis, Xavier
Noel, Brice P. Y.
van den Broeke, Michiel R.
Ryan, Jonathan C.
Smith, Laurence C.
Wu, Mengxi
Cooley, Sarah W.
Miège, Clément
Montgomery, Lynn N.
Koenig, Lora S.
Fettweis, Xavier
Noel, Brice P. Y.
van den Broeke, Michiel R.
author Ryan, Jonathan C.
Smith, Laurence C.
Wu, Mengxi
Cooley, Sarah W.
Miège, Clément
Montgomery, Lynn N.
Koenig, Lora S.
Fettweis, Xavier
Noel, Brice P. Y.
van den Broeke, Michiel R.
spellingShingle Ryan, Jonathan C.
Smith, Laurence C.
Wu, Mengxi
Cooley, Sarah W.
Miège, Clément
Montgomery, Lynn N.
Koenig, Lora S.
Fettweis, Xavier
Noel, Brice P. Y.
van den Broeke, Michiel R.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Geophysics
author_sort ryan, jonathan c.
spelling Ryan, Jonathan C. Smith, Laurence C. Wu, Mengxi Cooley, Sarah W. Miège, Clément Montgomery, Lynn N. Koenig, Lora S. Fettweis, Xavier Noel, Brice P. Y. van den Broeke, Michiel R. 2169-897X 2169-8996 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031411 <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>The Greenland Ice Sheet is now the single largest cryospheric contributor to global sea‐level rise yet uncertainty remains about its future contribution due to complex interactions between increasing snowfall and surface melt. Reducing uncertainty in future snowfall predictions requires sophisticated, physically based climate models evaluated with present‐day observations. The accuracy of modeled snowfall rates, however, has yet to be systematically assessed because observations are sparse. Here, we produce high spatial resolution (15 km) snowfall climatologies (2006–2016) derived from CloudSat's 2C‐SNOW‐PROFILE product to evaluate climate model simulations of snowfall across the Greenland Ice Sheet. In comparison to accumulation datasets acquired from ice cores and airborne accumulation radar, we find that our CloudSat climatologies capture broad spatial patterns of snowfall in both the accumulation and ablation zones. By comparing our CloudSat snowfall climatologies with the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model Version 2.3p2 (RACMO2.3p2), Modèle Atmosphérique Régional 3.9 (MAR3.9), ERA5, and Community Earth System Model version 1 (CESM1), we demonstrate that climate models likely overestimate snowfall rates at the margins of the ice sheet, particularly in South, Southeast, and Northwest Greenland during autumn and winter. Despite this overestimation, there are few areas of the ice sheet where the models and CloudSat substantially disagree about the spatial pattern and seasonality of snowfall rates. We conclude that a combination of CloudSat snowfall observations and the latest generation of climate models has the potential to improve understanding of how snowfall rates respond to increasing air temperatures, thereby constraining one of the largest sources of uncertainty in Greenland's future contribution to global sea levels.</jats:p> Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019jd031411
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Technik
Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDE5amQwMzE0MTE
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDE5amQwMzE0MTE
institution DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
issn 2169-8996
2169-897X
issn_str_mv 2169-8996
2169-897X
language English
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
match_str ryan2020evaluationofcloudsatscloudprofilingradarformappingsnowfallratesacrossthegreenlandicesheet
publishDateSort 2020
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
source_id 49
title Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_unstemmed Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_full Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_fullStr Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_short Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_sort evaluation of cloudsat's cloud‐profiling radar for mapping snowfall rates across the greenland ice sheet
topic Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031411
publishDate 2020
physical
description <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>The Greenland Ice Sheet is now the single largest cryospheric contributor to global sea‐level rise yet uncertainty remains about its future contribution due to complex interactions between increasing snowfall and surface melt. Reducing uncertainty in future snowfall predictions requires sophisticated, physically based climate models evaluated with present‐day observations. The accuracy of modeled snowfall rates, however, has yet to be systematically assessed because observations are sparse. Here, we produce high spatial resolution (15 km) snowfall climatologies (2006–2016) derived from CloudSat's 2C‐SNOW‐PROFILE product to evaluate climate model simulations of snowfall across the Greenland Ice Sheet. In comparison to accumulation datasets acquired from ice cores and airborne accumulation radar, we find that our CloudSat climatologies capture broad spatial patterns of snowfall in both the accumulation and ablation zones. By comparing our CloudSat snowfall climatologies with the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model Version 2.3p2 (RACMO2.3p2), Modèle Atmosphérique Régional 3.9 (MAR3.9), ERA5, and Community Earth System Model version 1 (CESM1), we demonstrate that climate models likely overestimate snowfall rates at the margins of the ice sheet, particularly in South, Southeast, and Northwest Greenland during autumn and winter. Despite this overestimation, there are few areas of the ice sheet where the models and CloudSat substantially disagree about the spatial pattern and seasonality of snowfall rates. We conclude that a combination of CloudSat snowfall observations and the latest generation of climate models has the potential to improve understanding of how snowfall rates respond to increasing air temperatures, thereby constraining one of the largest sources of uncertainty in Greenland's future contribution to global sea levels.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 125
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792341517174571012
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:21:10.448Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Evaluation+of+CloudSat%27s+Cloud%E2%80%90Profiling+Radar+for+Mapping+Snowfall+Rates+Across+the+Greenland+Ice+Sheet&rft.date=2020-02-27&genre=article&issn=2169-8996&volume=125&issue=4&jtitle=Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%3A+Atmospheres&atitle=Evaluation+of+CloudSat%27s+Cloud%E2%80%90Profiling+Radar+for+Mapping+Snowfall+Rates+Across+the+Greenland+Ice+Sheet&aulast=van+den+Broeke&aufirst=Michiel+R.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2019jd031411&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792341517174571012
author Ryan, Jonathan C., Smith, Laurence C., Wu, Mengxi, Cooley, Sarah W., Miège, Clément, Montgomery, Lynn N., Koenig, Lora S., Fettweis, Xavier, Noel, Brice P. Y., van den Broeke, Michiel R.
author_facet Ryan, Jonathan C., Smith, Laurence C., Wu, Mengxi, Cooley, Sarah W., Miège, Clément, Montgomery, Lynn N., Koenig, Lora S., Fettweis, Xavier, Noel, Brice P. Y., van den Broeke, Michiel R., Ryan, Jonathan C., Smith, Laurence C., Wu, Mengxi, Cooley, Sarah W., Miège, Clément, Montgomery, Lynn N., Koenig, Lora S., Fettweis, Xavier, Noel, Brice P. Y., van den Broeke, Michiel R.
author_sort ryan, jonathan c.
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 125
description <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>The Greenland Ice Sheet is now the single largest cryospheric contributor to global sea‐level rise yet uncertainty remains about its future contribution due to complex interactions between increasing snowfall and surface melt. Reducing uncertainty in future snowfall predictions requires sophisticated, physically based climate models evaluated with present‐day observations. The accuracy of modeled snowfall rates, however, has yet to be systematically assessed because observations are sparse. Here, we produce high spatial resolution (15 km) snowfall climatologies (2006–2016) derived from CloudSat's 2C‐SNOW‐PROFILE product to evaluate climate model simulations of snowfall across the Greenland Ice Sheet. In comparison to accumulation datasets acquired from ice cores and airborne accumulation radar, we find that our CloudSat climatologies capture broad spatial patterns of snowfall in both the accumulation and ablation zones. By comparing our CloudSat snowfall climatologies with the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model Version 2.3p2 (RACMO2.3p2), Modèle Atmosphérique Régional 3.9 (MAR3.9), ERA5, and Community Earth System Model version 1 (CESM1), we demonstrate that climate models likely overestimate snowfall rates at the margins of the ice sheet, particularly in South, Southeast, and Northwest Greenland during autumn and winter. Despite this overestimation, there are few areas of the ice sheet where the models and CloudSat substantially disagree about the spatial pattern and seasonality of snowfall rates. We conclude that a combination of CloudSat snowfall observations and the latest generation of climate models has the potential to improve understanding of how snowfall rates respond to increasing air temperatures, thereby constraining one of the largest sources of uncertainty in Greenland's future contribution to global sea levels.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019jd031411
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Technik, Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDE5amQwMzE0MTE
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
institution DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1
issn 2169-8996, 2169-897X
issn_str_mv 2169-8996, 2169-897X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:21:10.448Z
match_str ryan2020evaluationofcloudsatscloudprofilingradarformappingsnowfallratesacrossthegreenlandicesheet
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
source_id 49
spelling Ryan, Jonathan C. Smith, Laurence C. Wu, Mengxi Cooley, Sarah W. Miège, Clément Montgomery, Lynn N. Koenig, Lora S. Fettweis, Xavier Noel, Brice P. Y. van den Broeke, Michiel R. 2169-897X 2169-8996 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031411 <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>The Greenland Ice Sheet is now the single largest cryospheric contributor to global sea‐level rise yet uncertainty remains about its future contribution due to complex interactions between increasing snowfall and surface melt. Reducing uncertainty in future snowfall predictions requires sophisticated, physically based climate models evaluated with present‐day observations. The accuracy of modeled snowfall rates, however, has yet to be systematically assessed because observations are sparse. Here, we produce high spatial resolution (15 km) snowfall climatologies (2006–2016) derived from CloudSat's 2C‐SNOW‐PROFILE product to evaluate climate model simulations of snowfall across the Greenland Ice Sheet. In comparison to accumulation datasets acquired from ice cores and airborne accumulation radar, we find that our CloudSat climatologies capture broad spatial patterns of snowfall in both the accumulation and ablation zones. By comparing our CloudSat snowfall climatologies with the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model Version 2.3p2 (RACMO2.3p2), Modèle Atmosphérique Régional 3.9 (MAR3.9), ERA5, and Community Earth System Model version 1 (CESM1), we demonstrate that climate models likely overestimate snowfall rates at the margins of the ice sheet, particularly in South, Southeast, and Northwest Greenland during autumn and winter. Despite this overestimation, there are few areas of the ice sheet where the models and CloudSat substantially disagree about the spatial pattern and seasonality of snowfall rates. We conclude that a combination of CloudSat snowfall observations and the latest generation of climate models has the potential to improve understanding of how snowfall rates respond to increasing air temperatures, thereby constraining one of the largest sources of uncertainty in Greenland's future contribution to global sea levels.</jats:p> Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
spellingShingle Ryan, Jonathan C., Smith, Laurence C., Wu, Mengxi, Cooley, Sarah W., Miège, Clément, Montgomery, Lynn N., Koenig, Lora S., Fettweis, Xavier, Noel, Brice P. Y., van den Broeke, Michiel R., Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Geophysics
title Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_full Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_fullStr Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_short Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
title_sort evaluation of cloudsat's cloud‐profiling radar for mapping snowfall rates across the greenland ice sheet
title_unstemmed Evaluation of CloudSat's Cloud‐Profiling Radar for Mapping Snowfall Rates Across the Greenland Ice Sheet
topic Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031411