author_facet Zapata, S.
Sobel, E. R.
Del Papa, C.
Glodny, J.
Zapata, S.
Sobel, E. R.
Del Papa, C.
Glodny, J.
author Zapata, S.
Sobel, E. R.
Del Papa, C.
Glodny, J.
spellingShingle Zapata, S.
Sobel, E. R.
Del Papa, C.
Glodny, J.
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
Geochemistry and Petrology
Geophysics
author_sort zapata, s.
spelling Zapata, S. Sobel, E. R. Del Papa, C. Glodny, J. 1525-2027 1525-2027 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Geochemistry and Petrology Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019gc008876 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction.</jats:p> Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019gc008876
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Chemie und Pharmazie
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDE5Z2MwMDg4NzY
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDE5Z2MwMDg4NzY
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
issn 1525-2027
issn_str_mv 1525-2027
language English
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
match_str zapata2020upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26degsand28degsfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins
publishDateSort 2020
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
source_id 49
title Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_unstemmed Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_full Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_fullStr Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_full_unstemmed Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_short Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_sort upper plate controls on the formation of broken foreland basins in the andean retroarc between 26°s and 28°s: from cretaceous rifting to paleogene and miocene broken foreland basins
topic Geochemistry and Petrology
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019gc008876
publishDate 2020
physical
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction.</jats:p>
container_issue 7
container_start_page 0
container_title Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
container_volume 21
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792345987691315212
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:29:43.676Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Upper+Plate+Controls+on+the+Formation+of+Broken+Foreland+Basins+in+the+Andean+Retroarc+Between+26%C2%B0S+and+28%C2%B0S%3A+From+Cretaceous+Rifting+to+Paleogene+and+Miocene+Broken+Foreland+Basins&rft.date=2020-07-01&genre=article&issn=1525-2027&volume=21&issue=7&jtitle=Geochemistry%2C+Geophysics%2C+Geosystems&atitle=Upper+Plate+Controls+on+the+Formation+of+Broken+Foreland+Basins+in+the+Andean+Retroarc+Between+26%C2%B0S+and+28%C2%B0S%3A+From+Cretaceous+Rifting+to+Paleogene+and+Miocene+Broken+Foreland+Basins&aulast=Glodny&aufirst=J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2019gc008876&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792345987691315212
author Zapata, S., Sobel, E. R., Del Papa, C., Glodny, J.
author_facet Zapata, S., Sobel, E. R., Del Papa, C., Glodny, J., Zapata, S., Sobel, E. R., Del Papa, C., Glodny, J.
author_sort zapata, s.
container_issue 7
container_start_page 0
container_title Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
container_volume 21
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019gc008876
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDE5Z2MwMDg4NzY
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1525-2027
issn_str_mv 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:29:43.676Z
match_str zapata2020upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26degsand28degsfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
source_id 49
spelling Zapata, S. Sobel, E. R. Del Papa, C. Glodny, J. 1525-2027 1525-2027 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Geochemistry and Petrology Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019gc008876 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction.</jats:p> Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spellingShingle Zapata, S., Sobel, E. R., Del Papa, C., Glodny, J., Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins, Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics
title Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_full Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_fullStr Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_full_unstemmed Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_short Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_sort upper plate controls on the formation of broken foreland basins in the andean retroarc between 26°s and 28°s: from cretaceous rifting to paleogene and miocene broken foreland basins
title_unstemmed Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
topic Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019gc008876