author_facet Bromwich, David H.
Fogt, Ryan L.
Hodges, Kevin I.
Walsh, John E.
Bromwich, David H.
Fogt, Ryan L.
Hodges, Kevin I.
Walsh, John E.
author Bromwich, David H.
Fogt, Ryan L.
Hodges, Kevin I.
Walsh, John E.
spellingShingle Bromwich, David H.
Fogt, Ryan L.
Hodges, Kevin I.
Walsh, John E.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
author_sort bromwich, david h.
spelling Bromwich, David H. Fogt, Ryan L. Hodges, Kevin I. Walsh, John E. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007859 <jats:p>The reliability of the global reanalyses in the polar regions is investigated. The overview stems from an April 2006 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) workshop on the performance of global reanalyses in high latitudes held at the British Antarctic Survey. Overall, the skill is much higher in the Arctic than the Antarctic, where the reanalyses are only reliable in the summer months prior to the modern satellite era. In the Antarctic, large circulation differences between the reanalyses are found primarily before 1979, when vast quantities of satellite sounding data started to be assimilated. Specifically for ERA‐40, this data discontinuity creates a marked jump in Antarctic snow accumulation, especially at high elevations. In the Arctic, the largest differences are related to the reanalyses' depiction of clouds and their associated radiation impacts; ERA‐40 captures the cloud variability much better than NCEP1 and JRA‐25, but the ERA‐40 and JRA‐25 clouds are too optically thin for shortwave radiation. To further contrast the reanalyses skill, cyclone tracking results are presented. In the Southern Hemisphere, cyclonic activity is markedly different between the reanalyses, where there are few matched cyclones prior to 1979. In comparison, only some of the weaker cyclones are not matched in the Northern Hemisphere from 1958–2001, again indicating the superior skill in this hemisphere. Although this manuscript focuses on deficiencies in the reanalyses, it is important to note that they are a powerful tool for climate studies in both polar regions when used with a recognition of their limitations.</jats:p> A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2006jd007859
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Physik
Technik
Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Chemie und Pharmazie
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
Biologie
Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA2amQwMDc4NTk
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA2amQwMDc4NTk
institution DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2007
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2007
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
match_str bromwich2007atroposphericassessmentoftheera40ncepandjra25globalreanalysesinthepolarregions
publishDateSort 2007
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
source_id 49
title A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_unstemmed A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_full A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_fullStr A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_full_unstemmed A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_short A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_sort a tropospheric assessment of the era‐40, ncep, and jra‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
topic Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007859
publishDate 2007
physical
description <jats:p>The reliability of the global reanalyses in the polar regions is investigated. The overview stems from an April 2006 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) workshop on the performance of global reanalyses in high latitudes held at the British Antarctic Survey. Overall, the skill is much higher in the Arctic than the Antarctic, where the reanalyses are only reliable in the summer months prior to the modern satellite era. In the Antarctic, large circulation differences between the reanalyses are found primarily before 1979, when vast quantities of satellite sounding data started to be assimilated. Specifically for ERA‐40, this data discontinuity creates a marked jump in Antarctic snow accumulation, especially at high elevations. In the Arctic, the largest differences are related to the reanalyses' depiction of clouds and their associated radiation impacts; ERA‐40 captures the cloud variability much better than NCEP1 and JRA‐25, but the ERA‐40 and JRA‐25 clouds are too optically thin for shortwave radiation. To further contrast the reanalyses skill, cyclone tracking results are presented. In the Southern Hemisphere, cyclonic activity is markedly different between the reanalyses, where there are few matched cyclones prior to 1979. In comparison, only some of the weaker cyclones are not matched in the Northern Hemisphere from 1958–2001, again indicating the superior skill in this hemisphere. Although this manuscript focuses on deficiencies in the reanalyses, it is important to note that they are a powerful tool for climate studies in both polar regions when used with a recognition of their limitations.</jats:p>
container_issue D10
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 112
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792342218314350599
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:32:16.748Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=A+tropospheric+assessment+of+the+ERA%E2%80%9040%2C+NCEP%2C+and+JRA%E2%80%9025+global+reanalyses+in+the+polar+regions&rft.date=2007-05-27&genre=article&issn=0148-0227&volume=112&issue=D10&jtitle=Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%3A+Atmospheres&atitle=A+tropospheric+assessment+of+the+ERA%E2%80%9040%2C+NCEP%2C+and+JRA%E2%80%9025+global+reanalyses+in+the+polar+regions&aulast=Walsh&aufirst=John+E.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2006jd007859&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792342218314350599
author Bromwich, David H., Fogt, Ryan L., Hodges, Kevin I., Walsh, John E.
author_facet Bromwich, David H., Fogt, Ryan L., Hodges, Kevin I., Walsh, John E., Bromwich, David H., Fogt, Ryan L., Hodges, Kevin I., Walsh, John E.
author_sort bromwich, david h.
container_issue D10
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 112
description <jats:p>The reliability of the global reanalyses in the polar regions is investigated. The overview stems from an April 2006 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) workshop on the performance of global reanalyses in high latitudes held at the British Antarctic Survey. Overall, the skill is much higher in the Arctic than the Antarctic, where the reanalyses are only reliable in the summer months prior to the modern satellite era. In the Antarctic, large circulation differences between the reanalyses are found primarily before 1979, when vast quantities of satellite sounding data started to be assimilated. Specifically for ERA‐40, this data discontinuity creates a marked jump in Antarctic snow accumulation, especially at high elevations. In the Arctic, the largest differences are related to the reanalyses' depiction of clouds and their associated radiation impacts; ERA‐40 captures the cloud variability much better than NCEP1 and JRA‐25, but the ERA‐40 and JRA‐25 clouds are too optically thin for shortwave radiation. To further contrast the reanalyses skill, cyclone tracking results are presented. In the Southern Hemisphere, cyclonic activity is markedly different between the reanalyses, where there are few matched cyclones prior to 1979. In comparison, only some of the weaker cyclones are not matched in the Northern Hemisphere from 1958–2001, again indicating the superior skill in this hemisphere. Although this manuscript focuses on deficiencies in the reanalyses, it is important to note that they are a powerful tool for climate studies in both polar regions when used with a recognition of their limitations.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2006jd007859
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Physik, Technik, Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft, Biologie, Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA2amQwMDc4NTk
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2007
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2007
institution DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:32:16.748Z
match_str bromwich2007atroposphericassessmentoftheera40ncepandjra25globalreanalysesinthepolarregions
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2007
publishDateSort 2007
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
source_id 49
spelling Bromwich, David H. Fogt, Ryan L. Hodges, Kevin I. Walsh, John E. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007859 <jats:p>The reliability of the global reanalyses in the polar regions is investigated. The overview stems from an April 2006 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) workshop on the performance of global reanalyses in high latitudes held at the British Antarctic Survey. Overall, the skill is much higher in the Arctic than the Antarctic, where the reanalyses are only reliable in the summer months prior to the modern satellite era. In the Antarctic, large circulation differences between the reanalyses are found primarily before 1979, when vast quantities of satellite sounding data started to be assimilated. Specifically for ERA‐40, this data discontinuity creates a marked jump in Antarctic snow accumulation, especially at high elevations. In the Arctic, the largest differences are related to the reanalyses' depiction of clouds and their associated radiation impacts; ERA‐40 captures the cloud variability much better than NCEP1 and JRA‐25, but the ERA‐40 and JRA‐25 clouds are too optically thin for shortwave radiation. To further contrast the reanalyses skill, cyclone tracking results are presented. In the Southern Hemisphere, cyclonic activity is markedly different between the reanalyses, where there are few matched cyclones prior to 1979. In comparison, only some of the weaker cyclones are not matched in the Northern Hemisphere from 1958–2001, again indicating the superior skill in this hemisphere. Although this manuscript focuses on deficiencies in the reanalyses, it is important to note that they are a powerful tool for climate studies in both polar regions when used with a recognition of their limitations.</jats:p> A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
spellingShingle Bromwich, David H., Fogt, Ryan L., Hodges, Kevin I., Walsh, John E., Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
title A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_full A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_fullStr A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_full_unstemmed A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_short A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_sort a tropospheric assessment of the era‐40, ncep, and jra‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
title_unstemmed A tropospheric assessment of the ERA‐40, NCEP, and JRA‐25 global reanalyses in the polar regions
topic Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007859