Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , |
In: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 111, 2006, A11 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Zaharia, Sorin Jordanova, V. K. Thomsen, M. F. Reeves, G. D. Zaharia, Sorin Jordanova, V. K. Thomsen, M. F. Reeves, G. D. |
---|---|
author |
Zaharia, Sorin Jordanova, V. K. Thomsen, M. F. Reeves, G. D. |
spellingShingle |
Zaharia, Sorin Jordanova, V. K. Thomsen, M. F. Reeves, G. D. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics |
author_sort |
zaharia, sorin |
spelling |
Zaharia, Sorin Jordanova, V. K. Thomsen, M. F. Reeves, G. D. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006ja011619 <jats:p>A geomagnetic storm model needs to take into account the coupling between magnetic field and plasma, as the storm‐time field in the inner nightside magnetosphere can be very depressed compared to that of the Earth dipole, thus significantly modifying plasma transport. In this paper we extend our previous “one‐way” coupling between a kinetic ring current model and a magnetospheric force‐balance model to a fully magnetically self‐consistent approach, in which the force‐balanced fields are fed back into the kinetic model to guide its evolution. The approach is applied to simulating the 21–23 April 2001 “GEM Storm Challenge” event. We use boundary and initial conditions for the kinetic model from several spacecraft, and magnetic flux boundaries for the equilibrium code from an empirical magnetic field model. We find significant differences in the self‐consistent results compared to those obtained from the kinetic model with a dipolar background field (with the same particle boundary conditions and electric fields), due mainly to changes in the particle drifts. In addition to large depressions in the nightside magnetic field values compared to a dipolar field, we also find significantly lower particle density and perpendicular plasma pressure in the inner magnetosphere in the self‐consistent case, as well as local, narrow pressure peaks and strongly enhanced plasma <jats:italic>β</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>p</jats:italic></jats:sub> in localized regions on the nightside.</jats:p> Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
doi_str_mv |
10.1029/2006ja011619 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Geographie Chemie und Pharmazie Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft Biologie Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft Physik Technik Geologie und Paläontologie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA2amEwMTE2MTk |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA2amEwMTE2MTk |
institution |
DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 |
imprint |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2006 |
imprint_str_mv |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2006 |
issn |
0148-0227 |
issn_str_mv |
0148-0227 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
zaharia2006selfconsistentmodelingofmagneticfieldsandplasmasintheinnermagnetosphereapplicationtoageomagneticstorm |
publishDateSort |
2006 |
publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_unstemmed |
Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_full |
Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_fullStr |
Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_short |
Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_sort |
self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: application to a geomagnetic storm |
topic |
Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006ja011619 |
publishDate |
2006 |
physical |
|
description |
<jats:p>A geomagnetic storm model needs to take into account the coupling between magnetic field and plasma, as the storm‐time field in the inner nightside magnetosphere can be very depressed compared to that of the Earth dipole, thus significantly modifying plasma transport. In this paper we extend our previous “one‐way” coupling between a kinetic ring current model and a magnetospheric force‐balance model to a fully magnetically self‐consistent approach, in which the force‐balanced fields are fed back into the kinetic model to guide its evolution. The approach is applied to simulating the 21–23 April 2001 “GEM Storm Challenge” event. We use boundary and initial conditions for the kinetic model from several spacecraft, and magnetic flux boundaries for the equilibrium code from an empirical magnetic field model. We find significant differences in the self‐consistent results compared to those obtained from the kinetic model with a dipolar background field (with the same particle boundary conditions and electric fields), due mainly to changes in the particle drifts. In addition to large depressions in the nightside magnetic field values compared to a dipolar field, we also find significantly lower particle density and perpendicular plasma pressure in the inner magnetosphere in the self‐consistent case, as well as local, narrow pressure peaks and strongly enhanced plasma <jats:italic>β</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>p</jats:italic></jats:sub> in localized regions on the nightside.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
A11 |
container_start_page |
0 |
container_title |
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
container_volume |
111 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792348696192483344 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T18:15:04.651Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Self%E2%80%90consistent+modeling+of+magnetic+fields+and+plasmas+in+the+inner+magnetosphere%3A+Application+to+a+geomagnetic+storm&rft.date=2006-11-01&genre=article&issn=0148-0227&volume=111&issue=A11&jtitle=Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%3A+Space+Physics&atitle=Self%E2%80%90consistent+modeling+of+magnetic+fields+and+plasmas+in+the+inner+magnetosphere%3A+Application+to+a+geomagnetic+storm&aulast=Reeves&aufirst=G.+D.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2006ja011619&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792348696192483344 |
author | Zaharia, Sorin, Jordanova, V. K., Thomsen, M. F., Reeves, G. D. |
author_facet | Zaharia, Sorin, Jordanova, V. K., Thomsen, M. F., Reeves, G. D., Zaharia, Sorin, Jordanova, V. K., Thomsen, M. F., Reeves, G. D. |
author_sort | zaharia, sorin |
container_issue | A11 |
container_start_page | 0 |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
container_volume | 111 |
description | <jats:p>A geomagnetic storm model needs to take into account the coupling between magnetic field and plasma, as the storm‐time field in the inner nightside magnetosphere can be very depressed compared to that of the Earth dipole, thus significantly modifying plasma transport. In this paper we extend our previous “one‐way” coupling between a kinetic ring current model and a magnetospheric force‐balance model to a fully magnetically self‐consistent approach, in which the force‐balanced fields are fed back into the kinetic model to guide its evolution. The approach is applied to simulating the 21–23 April 2001 “GEM Storm Challenge” event. We use boundary and initial conditions for the kinetic model from several spacecraft, and magnetic flux boundaries for the equilibrium code from an empirical magnetic field model. We find significant differences in the self‐consistent results compared to those obtained from the kinetic model with a dipolar background field (with the same particle boundary conditions and electric fields), due mainly to changes in the particle drifts. In addition to large depressions in the nightside magnetic field values compared to a dipolar field, we also find significantly lower particle density and perpendicular plasma pressure in the inner magnetosphere in the self‐consistent case, as well as local, narrow pressure peaks and strongly enhanced plasma <jats:italic>β</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>p</jats:italic></jats:sub> in localized regions on the nightside.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2006ja011619 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft, Biologie, Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft, Physik, Technik, Geologie und Paläontologie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA2amEwMTE2MTk |
imprint | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2006 |
imprint_str_mv | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2006 |
institution | DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161 |
issn | 0148-0227 |
issn_str_mv | 0148-0227 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T18:15:04.651Z |
match_str | zaharia2006selfconsistentmodelingofmagneticfieldsandplasmasintheinnermagnetosphereapplicationtoageomagneticstorm |
mega_collection | American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
physical | |
publishDate | 2006 |
publishDateSort | 2006 |
publisher | American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Zaharia, Sorin Jordanova, V. K. Thomsen, M. F. Reeves, G. D. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006ja011619 <jats:p>A geomagnetic storm model needs to take into account the coupling between magnetic field and plasma, as the storm‐time field in the inner nightside magnetosphere can be very depressed compared to that of the Earth dipole, thus significantly modifying plasma transport. In this paper we extend our previous “one‐way” coupling between a kinetic ring current model and a magnetospheric force‐balance model to a fully magnetically self‐consistent approach, in which the force‐balanced fields are fed back into the kinetic model to guide its evolution. The approach is applied to simulating the 21–23 April 2001 “GEM Storm Challenge” event. We use boundary and initial conditions for the kinetic model from several spacecraft, and magnetic flux boundaries for the equilibrium code from an empirical magnetic field model. We find significant differences in the self‐consistent results compared to those obtained from the kinetic model with a dipolar background field (with the same particle boundary conditions and electric fields), due mainly to changes in the particle drifts. In addition to large depressions in the nightside magnetic field values compared to a dipolar field, we also find significantly lower particle density and perpendicular plasma pressure in the inner magnetosphere in the self‐consistent case, as well as local, narrow pressure peaks and strongly enhanced plasma <jats:italic>β</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>p</jats:italic></jats:sub> in localized regions on the nightside.</jats:p> Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
spellingShingle | Zaharia, Sorin, Jordanova, V. K., Thomsen, M. F., Reeves, G. D., Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics |
title | Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_full | Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_fullStr | Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_full_unstemmed | Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_short | Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_sort | self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: application to a geomagnetic storm |
title_unstemmed | Self‐consistent modeling of magnetic fields and plasmas in the inner magnetosphere: Application to a geomagnetic storm |
topic | Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006ja011619 |