Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
In: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 104, 1999, C5, S. 11499-11514 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Wentz, Frank J. Smith, Deborah K. Wentz, Frank J. Smith, Deborah K. |
---|---|
author |
Wentz, Frank J. Smith, Deborah K. |
spellingShingle |
Wentz, Frank J. Smith, Deborah K. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics |
author_sort |
wentz, frank j. |
spelling |
Wentz, Frank J. Smith, Deborah K. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jc02148 <jats:p>A model for the ocean surface normalized radar cross section σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> is derived from 3 months of NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) observations (September 15 to December 18, 1996). The model expresses σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> as a function of wind speed, relative wind direction, incidence angle, and polarization. The dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> on wind speed is based on collocated special sensor microwave/imager (SSM/I) satellite wind retrievals and European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model winds. We find that at low winds (<5 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), the SSM/I winds are more reliable than ECWMF, probably owing to small location errors in the ECMWF wind features. The primary wind direction dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> (i.e., the second harmonic) is found from histograms of the σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> difference between the forward and aft antennas. The σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> versus wind speed relationship is adjusted for cross‐swath incidence angle differences and is then incorporated into the NSCAT 1 model used to process the 10‐month (September 15, 1996, to June 29, 1997) NSCAT data set. The resulting NSCAT 1 wind vectors are compared to ECMWF wind fields and buoys. The mean and standard deviation of the NSCAT minus ECMWF (buoy) wind speed difference are 0.05 and 1.78 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (−0.29 and 1.26 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), respectively. The wind direction mean and standard deviation differences are 0.8° and 18.5° (7.9° and 15.7°), respectively. The difference between the NSCAT and the ECMWF (buoy) direction exceeds 90° only 1.1% (1.2%) of the time. We have no explanation for why the buoy wind directions are biased 8° relative to both NSCAT and ECMWF.</jats:p> A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans |
doi_str_mv |
10.1029/98jc02148 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Physik Technik Geologie und Paläontologie Geographie Chemie und Pharmazie Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft Biologie Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS85OGpjMDIxNDg |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS85OGpjMDIxNDg |
institution |
DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 |
imprint |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 1999 |
imprint_str_mv |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 1999 |
issn |
0148-0227 |
issn_str_mv |
0148-0227 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
wentz1999amodelfunctionfortheoceannormalizedradarcrosssectionat14ghzderivedfromnscatobservations |
publishDateSort |
1999 |
publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans |
source_id |
49 |
title |
A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_unstemmed |
A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_full |
A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_fullStr |
A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_full_unstemmed |
A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_short |
A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_sort |
a model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 ghz derived from nscat observations |
topic |
Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jc02148 |
publishDate |
1999 |
physical |
11499-11514 |
description |
<jats:p>A model for the ocean surface normalized radar cross section σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> is derived from 3 months of NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) observations (September 15 to December 18, 1996). The model expresses σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> as a function of wind speed, relative wind direction, incidence angle, and polarization. The dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> on wind speed is based on collocated special sensor microwave/imager (SSM/I) satellite wind retrievals and European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model winds. We find that at low winds (<5 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), the SSM/I winds are more reliable than ECWMF, probably owing to small location errors in the ECMWF wind features. The primary wind direction dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> (i.e., the second harmonic) is found from histograms of the σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> difference between the forward and aft antennas. The σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> versus wind speed relationship is adjusted for cross‐swath incidence angle differences and is then incorporated into the NSCAT 1 model used to process the 10‐month (September 15, 1996, to June 29, 1997) NSCAT data set. The resulting NSCAT 1 wind vectors are compared to ECMWF wind fields and buoys. The mean and standard deviation of the NSCAT minus ECMWF (buoy) wind speed difference are 0.05 and 1.78 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (−0.29 and 1.26 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), respectively. The wind direction mean and standard deviation differences are 0.8° and 18.5° (7.9° and 15.7°), respectively. The difference between the NSCAT and the ECMWF (buoy) direction exceeds 90° only 1.1% (1.2%) of the time. We have no explanation for why the buoy wind directions are biased 8° relative to both NSCAT and ECMWF.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
C5 |
container_start_page |
11499 |
container_title |
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans |
container_volume |
104 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792343302644695050 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:49:33.301Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=A+model+function+for+the+ocean%E2%80%90normalized+radar+cross+section+at+14+GHz+derived+from+NSCAT+observations&rft.date=1999-05-15&genre=article&issn=0148-0227&volume=104&issue=C5&spage=11499&epage=11514&pages=11499-11514&jtitle=Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%3A+Oceans&atitle=A+model+function+for+the+ocean%E2%80%90normalized+radar+cross+section+at+14+GHz+derived+from+NSCAT+observations&aulast=Smith&aufirst=Deborah+K.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F98jc02148&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792343302644695050 |
author | Wentz, Frank J., Smith, Deborah K. |
author_facet | Wentz, Frank J., Smith, Deborah K., Wentz, Frank J., Smith, Deborah K. |
author_sort | wentz, frank j. |
container_issue | C5 |
container_start_page | 11499 |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans |
container_volume | 104 |
description | <jats:p>A model for the ocean surface normalized radar cross section σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> is derived from 3 months of NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) observations (September 15 to December 18, 1996). The model expresses σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> as a function of wind speed, relative wind direction, incidence angle, and polarization. The dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> on wind speed is based on collocated special sensor microwave/imager (SSM/I) satellite wind retrievals and European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model winds. We find that at low winds (<5 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), the SSM/I winds are more reliable than ECWMF, probably owing to small location errors in the ECMWF wind features. The primary wind direction dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> (i.e., the second harmonic) is found from histograms of the σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> difference between the forward and aft antennas. The σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> versus wind speed relationship is adjusted for cross‐swath incidence angle differences and is then incorporated into the NSCAT 1 model used to process the 10‐month (September 15, 1996, to June 29, 1997) NSCAT data set. The resulting NSCAT 1 wind vectors are compared to ECMWF wind fields and buoys. The mean and standard deviation of the NSCAT minus ECMWF (buoy) wind speed difference are 0.05 and 1.78 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (−0.29 and 1.26 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), respectively. The wind direction mean and standard deviation differences are 0.8° and 18.5° (7.9° and 15.7°), respectively. The difference between the NSCAT and the ECMWF (buoy) direction exceeds 90° only 1.1% (1.2%) of the time. We have no explanation for why the buoy wind directions are biased 8° relative to both NSCAT and ECMWF.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/98jc02148 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Physik, Technik, Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft, Biologie, Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS85OGpjMDIxNDg |
imprint | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 1999 |
imprint_str_mv | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 1999 |
institution | DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1 |
issn | 0148-0227 |
issn_str_mv | 0148-0227 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:49:33.301Z |
match_str | wentz1999amodelfunctionfortheoceannormalizedradarcrosssectionat14ghzderivedfromnscatobservations |
mega_collection | American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
physical | 11499-11514 |
publishDate | 1999 |
publishDateSort | 1999 |
publisher | American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Wentz, Frank J. Smith, Deborah K. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jc02148 <jats:p>A model for the ocean surface normalized radar cross section σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> is derived from 3 months of NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) observations (September 15 to December 18, 1996). The model expresses σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> as a function of wind speed, relative wind direction, incidence angle, and polarization. The dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> on wind speed is based on collocated special sensor microwave/imager (SSM/I) satellite wind retrievals and European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model winds. We find that at low winds (<5 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), the SSM/I winds are more reliable than ECWMF, probably owing to small location errors in the ECMWF wind features. The primary wind direction dependence of σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> (i.e., the second harmonic) is found from histograms of the σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> difference between the forward and aft antennas. The σ<jats:sub>o</jats:sub> versus wind speed relationship is adjusted for cross‐swath incidence angle differences and is then incorporated into the NSCAT 1 model used to process the 10‐month (September 15, 1996, to June 29, 1997) NSCAT data set. The resulting NSCAT 1 wind vectors are compared to ECMWF wind fields and buoys. The mean and standard deviation of the NSCAT minus ECMWF (buoy) wind speed difference are 0.05 and 1.78 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (−0.29 and 1.26 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), respectively. The wind direction mean and standard deviation differences are 0.8° and 18.5° (7.9° and 15.7°), respectively. The difference between the NSCAT and the ECMWF (buoy) direction exceeds 90° only 1.1% (1.2%) of the time. We have no explanation for why the buoy wind directions are biased 8° relative to both NSCAT and ECMWF.</jats:p> A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans |
spellingShingle | Wentz, Frank J., Smith, Deborah K., Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics |
title | A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_full | A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_fullStr | A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_full_unstemmed | A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_short | A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
title_sort | a model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 ghz derived from nscat observations |
title_unstemmed | A model function for the ocean‐normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations |
topic | Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jc02148 |