Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Public Health Nutrition |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , , , , |
| In: | Public Health Nutrition, 19, 2016, 13, S. 2377-2387 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Faulkner, Gemma P Livingstone, M Barbara E Pourshahidi, L Kirsty Spence, Michelle Dean, Moira O’Brien, Sinead Gibney, Eileen R Wallace, Julie MW McCaffrey, Tracy A Kerr, Maeve A Faulkner, Gemma P Livingstone, M Barbara E Pourshahidi, L Kirsty Spence, Michelle Dean, Moira O’Brien, Sinead Gibney, Eileen R Wallace, Julie MW McCaffrey, Tracy A Kerr, Maeve A |
|---|---|
| author |
Faulkner, Gemma P Livingstone, M Barbara E Pourshahidi, L Kirsty Spence, Michelle Dean, Moira O’Brien, Sinead Gibney, Eileen R Wallace, Julie MW McCaffrey, Tracy A Kerr, Maeve A |
| spellingShingle |
Faulkner, Gemma P Livingstone, M Barbara E Pourshahidi, L Kirsty Spence, Michelle Dean, Moira O’Brien, Sinead Gibney, Eileen R Wallace, Julie MW McCaffrey, Tracy A Kerr, Maeve A Public Health Nutrition An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) |
| author_sort |
faulkner, gemma p |
| spelling |
Faulkner, Gemma P Livingstone, M Barbara E Pourshahidi, L Kirsty Spence, Michelle Dean, Moira O’Brien, Sinead Gibney, Eileen R Wallace, Julie MW McCaffrey, Tracy A Kerr, Maeve A 1368-9800 1475-2727 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016000082 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs2" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs3" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs4" sec-type="subjects"><jats:title>Subjects</jats:title><jats:p>Males and females aged 18–64 years (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> 120).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs5" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights for estimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 %), particularly dinner (86 %) in the home (89 %; all <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0·001) for amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs6" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Household measures may be precise, easy to use and acceptable aids for estimating the appropriate portion size of amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec> An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use Public Health Nutrition |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1017/s1368980016000082 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMTM2ODk4MDAxNjAwMDA4Mg |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMTM2ODk4MDAxNjAwMDA4Mg |
| institution |
DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 |
| imprint |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016 |
| issn |
1368-9800 1475-2727 |
| issn_str_mv |
1368-9800 1475-2727 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
faulkner2016anevaluationofportionsizeestimationaidsprecisioneaseofuseandlikelihoodoffutureuse |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Public Health Nutrition |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_unstemmed |
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_full |
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_fullStr |
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_full_unstemmed |
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_short |
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_sort |
an evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| topic |
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016000082 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| physical |
2377-2387 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs2" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs3" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs4" sec-type="subjects"><jats:title>Subjects</jats:title><jats:p>Males and females aged 18–64 years (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> 120).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs5" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights for estimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 %), particularly dinner (86 %) in the home (89 %; all <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0·001) for amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs6" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Household measures may be precise, easy to use and acceptable aids for estimating the appropriate portion size of amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
13 |
| container_start_page |
2377 |
| container_title |
Public Health Nutrition |
| container_volume |
19 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792343596762923014 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:53:40.544Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=An+evaluation+of+portion+size+estimation+aids%3A+precision%2C+ease+of+use+and+likelihood+of+future+use&rft.date=2016-09-01&genre=article&issn=1475-2727&volume=19&issue=13&spage=2377&epage=2387&pages=2377-2387&jtitle=Public+Health+Nutrition&atitle=An+evaluation+of+portion+size+estimation+aids%3A+precision%2C+ease+of+use+and+likelihood+of+future+use&aulast=Kerr&aufirst=Maeve+A&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fs1368980016000082&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792343596762923014 |
| author | Faulkner, Gemma P, Livingstone, M Barbara E, Pourshahidi, L Kirsty, Spence, Michelle, Dean, Moira, O’Brien, Sinead, Gibney, Eileen R, Wallace, Julie MW, McCaffrey, Tracy A, Kerr, Maeve A |
| author_facet | Faulkner, Gemma P, Livingstone, M Barbara E, Pourshahidi, L Kirsty, Spence, Michelle, Dean, Moira, O’Brien, Sinead, Gibney, Eileen R, Wallace, Julie MW, McCaffrey, Tracy A, Kerr, Maeve A, Faulkner, Gemma P, Livingstone, M Barbara E, Pourshahidi, L Kirsty, Spence, Michelle, Dean, Moira, O’Brien, Sinead, Gibney, Eileen R, Wallace, Julie MW, McCaffrey, Tracy A, Kerr, Maeve A |
| author_sort | faulkner, gemma p |
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 2377 |
| container_title | Public Health Nutrition |
| container_volume | 19 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs2" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs3" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs4" sec-type="subjects"><jats:title>Subjects</jats:title><jats:p>Males and females aged 18–64 years (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> 120).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs5" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights for estimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 %), particularly dinner (86 %) in the home (89 %; all <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0·001) for amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs6" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Household measures may be precise, easy to use and acceptable aids for estimating the appropriate portion size of amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/s1368980016000082 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMTM2ODk4MDAxNjAwMDA4Mg |
| imprint | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016 |
| institution | DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275 |
| issn | 1368-9800, 1475-2727 |
| issn_str_mv | 1368-9800, 1475-2727 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:53:40.544Z |
| match_str | faulkner2016anevaluationofportionsizeestimationaidsprecisioneaseofuseandlikelihoodoffutureuse |
| mega_collection | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 2377-2387 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Public Health Nutrition |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Faulkner, Gemma P Livingstone, M Barbara E Pourshahidi, L Kirsty Spence, Michelle Dean, Moira O’Brien, Sinead Gibney, Eileen R Wallace, Julie MW McCaffrey, Tracy A Kerr, Maeve A 1368-9800 1475-2727 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016000082 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs2" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs3" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs4" sec-type="subjects"><jats:title>Subjects</jats:title><jats:p>Males and females aged 18–64 years (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> 120).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs5" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights for estimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 %), particularly dinner (86 %) in the home (89 %; all <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0·001) for amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1368980016000082_abs6" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Household measures may be precise, easy to use and acceptable aids for estimating the appropriate portion size of amorphous grain foods.</jats:p></jats:sec> An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use Public Health Nutrition |
| spellingShingle | Faulkner, Gemma P, Livingstone, M Barbara E, Pourshahidi, L Kirsty, Spence, Michelle, Dean, Moira, O’Brien, Sinead, Gibney, Eileen R, Wallace, Julie MW, McCaffrey, Tracy A, Kerr, Maeve A, Public Health Nutrition, An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous) |
| title | An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_full | An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_fullStr | An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_short | An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_sort | an evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| title_unstemmed | An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use |
| topic | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous) |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016000082 |