Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | CNS Spectrums |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| In: | CNS Spectrums, 19, 2014, 3, S. 256-267 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Knappe, Susanne Klotsche, Jens Heyde, Franziska Hiob, Sarah Siegert, Jens Hoyer, Jürgen Strobel, Anja LeBeau, Richard T. Craske, Michelle G. Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich Beesdo-Baum, Katja Knappe, Susanne Klotsche, Jens Heyde, Franziska Hiob, Sarah Siegert, Jens Hoyer, Jürgen Strobel, Anja LeBeau, Richard T. Craske, Michelle G. Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich Beesdo-Baum, Katja |
|---|---|
| author |
Knappe, Susanne Klotsche, Jens Heyde, Franziska Hiob, Sarah Siegert, Jens Hoyer, Jürgen Strobel, Anja LeBeau, Richard T. Craske, Michelle G. Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich Beesdo-Baum, Katja |
| spellingShingle |
Knappe, Susanne Klotsche, Jens Heyde, Franziska Hiob, Sarah Siegert, Jens Hoyer, Jürgen Strobel, Anja LeBeau, Richard T. Craske, Michelle G. Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich Beesdo-Baum, Katja CNS Spectrums Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 Psychiatry and Mental health Neurology (clinical) |
| author_sort |
knappe, susanne |
| spelling |
Knappe, Susanne Klotsche, Jens Heyde, Franziska Hiob, Sarah Siegert, Jens Hoyer, Jürgen Strobel, Anja LeBeau, Richard T. Craske, Michelle G. Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich Beesdo-Baum, Katja 1092-8529 2165-6509 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Psychiatry and Mental health Neurology (clinical) http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1092852913000710 <jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>This article reports on the test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of a set of brief dimensional self-rating questionnaires for social anxiety disorder (SAD-D), specific phobia (SP-D), agoraphobia (AG-D), panic disorder (PD-D), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-D), as well as a general cross-cutting anxiety scale (Cross-D), which were developed to supplement categorical diagnoses in the <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 5th edition (DSM-5).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The German versions of the dimensional anxiety scales were administered to 218 students followed up approximately 2 weeks later (Study 1) and 55 outpatients (23 with anxiety diagnoses) followed-up 1 year later (Study 2). Probable diagnostic status in students was determined by the DIA-X/M-CIDI stem screening-questionnaire (SSQ). In the clinical sample, <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses were assessed at Time 1 using the DIA-X/M-CIDI. At Time 2, the patient-version of the Clinical Global Impression—Improvement scale (CGI-I) was applied to assess change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Good psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, were found for the dimensional scales except for SP-D. In outpatients, improvement at Time 2 was associated with significant decrease in PD-D, GAD-D, and Cross-D scores.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs4" sec-type="discussion"><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>Major advantages of the scales include that they are brief, concise, and based on a consistent template to measure the cognitive, physiological, and behavioral symptoms of fear and anxiety. Further replication in larger samples is needed. Given its modest psychometric properties, SP-D needs refinement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs5" sec-type="conclusion"><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Increasing evidence from diverse samples suggests clinical utility of the dimensional anxiety scales.</jats:p></jats:sec> Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 CNS Spectrums |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1017/s1092852913000710 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin Psychologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMTA5Mjg1MjkxMzAwMDcxMA |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMTA5Mjg1MjkxMzAwMDcxMA |
| institution |
DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 |
| imprint |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2014 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2014 |
| issn |
1092-8529 2165-6509 |
| issn_str_mv |
1092-8529 2165-6509 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
knappe2014testretestreliabilityandsensitivitytochangeofthedimensionalanxietyscalesfordsm5 |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
CNS Spectrums |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_unstemmed |
Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_full |
Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_fullStr |
Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_short |
Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_sort |
test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for dsm-5 |
| topic |
Psychiatry and Mental health Neurology (clinical) |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1092852913000710 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| physical |
256-267 |
| description |
<jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>This article reports on the test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of a set of brief dimensional self-rating questionnaires for social anxiety disorder (SAD-D), specific phobia (SP-D), agoraphobia (AG-D), panic disorder (PD-D), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-D), as well as a general cross-cutting anxiety scale (Cross-D), which were developed to supplement categorical diagnoses in the <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 5th edition (DSM-5).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The German versions of the dimensional anxiety scales were administered to 218 students followed up approximately 2 weeks later (Study 1) and 55 outpatients (23 with anxiety diagnoses) followed-up 1 year later (Study 2). Probable diagnostic status in students was determined by the DIA-X/M-CIDI stem screening-questionnaire (SSQ). In the clinical sample, <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses were assessed at Time 1 using the DIA-X/M-CIDI. At Time 2, the patient-version of the Clinical Global Impression—Improvement scale (CGI-I) was applied to assess change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Good psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, were found for the dimensional scales except for SP-D. In outpatients, improvement at Time 2 was associated with significant decrease in PD-D, GAD-D, and Cross-D scores.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs4" sec-type="discussion"><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>Major advantages of the scales include that they are brief, concise, and based on a consistent template to measure the cognitive, physiological, and behavioral symptoms of fear and anxiety. Further replication in larger samples is needed. Given its modest psychometric properties, SP-D needs refinement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs5" sec-type="conclusion"><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Increasing evidence from diverse samples suggests clinical utility of the dimensional anxiety scales.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
3 |
| container_start_page |
256 |
| container_title |
CNS Spectrums |
| container_volume |
19 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792345633093320710 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:26:34.443Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Test%E2%80%93retest+reliability+and+sensitivity+to+change+of+the+dimensional+anxiety+scales+for+DSM-5&rft.date=2014-06-01&genre=article&issn=2165-6509&volume=19&issue=3&spage=256&epage=267&pages=256-267&jtitle=CNS+Spectrums&atitle=Test%E2%80%93retest+reliability+and+sensitivity+to+change+of+the+dimensional+anxiety+scales+for+DSM-5&aulast=Beesdo-Baum&aufirst=Katja&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fs1092852913000710&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792345633093320710 |
| author | Knappe, Susanne, Klotsche, Jens, Heyde, Franziska, Hiob, Sarah, Siegert, Jens, Hoyer, Jürgen, Strobel, Anja, LeBeau, Richard T., Craske, Michelle G., Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Beesdo-Baum, Katja |
| author_facet | Knappe, Susanne, Klotsche, Jens, Heyde, Franziska, Hiob, Sarah, Siegert, Jens, Hoyer, Jürgen, Strobel, Anja, LeBeau, Richard T., Craske, Michelle G., Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Beesdo-Baum, Katja, Knappe, Susanne, Klotsche, Jens, Heyde, Franziska, Hiob, Sarah, Siegert, Jens, Hoyer, Jürgen, Strobel, Anja, LeBeau, Richard T., Craske, Michelle G., Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Beesdo-Baum, Katja |
| author_sort | knappe, susanne |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 256 |
| container_title | CNS Spectrums |
| container_volume | 19 |
| description | <jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>This article reports on the test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of a set of brief dimensional self-rating questionnaires for social anxiety disorder (SAD-D), specific phobia (SP-D), agoraphobia (AG-D), panic disorder (PD-D), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-D), as well as a general cross-cutting anxiety scale (Cross-D), which were developed to supplement categorical diagnoses in the <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 5th edition (DSM-5).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The German versions of the dimensional anxiety scales were administered to 218 students followed up approximately 2 weeks later (Study 1) and 55 outpatients (23 with anxiety diagnoses) followed-up 1 year later (Study 2). Probable diagnostic status in students was determined by the DIA-X/M-CIDI stem screening-questionnaire (SSQ). In the clinical sample, <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses were assessed at Time 1 using the DIA-X/M-CIDI. At Time 2, the patient-version of the Clinical Global Impression—Improvement scale (CGI-I) was applied to assess change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Good psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, were found for the dimensional scales except for SP-D. In outpatients, improvement at Time 2 was associated with significant decrease in PD-D, GAD-D, and Cross-D scores.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs4" sec-type="discussion"><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>Major advantages of the scales include that they are brief, concise, and based on a consistent template to measure the cognitive, physiological, and behavioral symptoms of fear and anxiety. Further replication in larger samples is needed. Given its modest psychometric properties, SP-D needs refinement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs5" sec-type="conclusion"><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Increasing evidence from diverse samples suggests clinical utility of the dimensional anxiety scales.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/s1092852913000710 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin, Psychologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMTA5Mjg1MjkxMzAwMDcxMA |
| imprint | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2014 |
| imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2014 |
| institution | DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275 |
| issn | 1092-8529, 2165-6509 |
| issn_str_mv | 1092-8529, 2165-6509 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:26:34.443Z |
| match_str | knappe2014testretestreliabilityandsensitivitytochangeofthedimensionalanxietyscalesfordsm5 |
| mega_collection | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 256-267 |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | CNS Spectrums |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Knappe, Susanne Klotsche, Jens Heyde, Franziska Hiob, Sarah Siegert, Jens Hoyer, Jürgen Strobel, Anja LeBeau, Richard T. Craske, Michelle G. Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich Beesdo-Baum, Katja 1092-8529 2165-6509 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Psychiatry and Mental health Neurology (clinical) http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1092852913000710 <jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>This article reports on the test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of a set of brief dimensional self-rating questionnaires for social anxiety disorder (SAD-D), specific phobia (SP-D), agoraphobia (AG-D), panic disorder (PD-D), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-D), as well as a general cross-cutting anxiety scale (Cross-D), which were developed to supplement categorical diagnoses in the <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 5th edition (DSM-5).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The German versions of the dimensional anxiety scales were administered to 218 students followed up approximately 2 weeks later (Study 1) and 55 outpatients (23 with anxiety diagnoses) followed-up 1 year later (Study 2). Probable diagnostic status in students was determined by the DIA-X/M-CIDI stem screening-questionnaire (SSQ). In the clinical sample, <jats:italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</jats:italic>, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses were assessed at Time 1 using the DIA-X/M-CIDI. At Time 2, the patient-version of the Clinical Global Impression—Improvement scale (CGI-I) was applied to assess change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Good psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, were found for the dimensional scales except for SP-D. In outpatients, improvement at Time 2 was associated with significant decrease in PD-D, GAD-D, and Cross-D scores.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs4" sec-type="discussion"><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>Major advantages of the scales include that they are brief, concise, and based on a consistent template to measure the cognitive, physiological, and behavioral symptoms of fear and anxiety. Further replication in larger samples is needed. Given its modest psychometric properties, SP-D needs refinement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1092852913000710_abs5" sec-type="conclusion"><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Increasing evidence from diverse samples suggests clinical utility of the dimensional anxiety scales.</jats:p></jats:sec> Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 CNS Spectrums |
| spellingShingle | Knappe, Susanne, Klotsche, Jens, Heyde, Franziska, Hiob, Sarah, Siegert, Jens, Hoyer, Jürgen, Strobel, Anja, LeBeau, Richard T., Craske, Michelle G., Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Beesdo-Baum, Katja, CNS Spectrums, Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology (clinical) |
| title | Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_full | Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_fullStr | Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_short | Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| title_sort | test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for dsm-5 |
| title_unstemmed | Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5 |
| topic | Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology (clinical) |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1092852913000710 |