author_facet Arel-Bundock, Vincent
Parinandi, Srinivas
Arel-Bundock, Vincent
Parinandi, Srinivas
author Arel-Bundock, Vincent
Parinandi, Srinivas
spellingShingle Arel-Bundock, Vincent
Parinandi, Srinivas
Journal of Public Policy
Conditional tax competition in American states
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Public Administration
author_sort arel-bundock, vincent
spelling Arel-Bundock, Vincent Parinandi, Srinivas 0143-814X 1469-7815 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Public Administration http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x17000071 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Cross-border commercial activity raises issues in federations where multiple jurisdictions can claim the right to tax the same income. In the United States, this coordination problem is resolved by splitting the tax base according to the geographic distribution of firms’ sales, capital and labour. The weight of each factor is determined on a state-by-state basis, which opens room for competitive legislative behaviour. In this complex issue area, however, policymakers must invest lot of resources to monitor competitors, evaluate policy alternatives and shepherd tax reform through the legislative process. This implies that highly professional legislatures should be more responsive to the policies of nearby states. We consider data on most American states over the period from 1986 to 2013 and find strong evidence of<jats:italic>conditional spatial dependence</jats:italic>. Our findings suggest that policy diffusion may often be moderated by institutional and political factors.</jats:p> Conditional tax competition in American states Journal of Public Policy
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0143814x17000071
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDE0MzgxNHgxNzAwMDA3MQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDE0MzgxNHgxNzAwMDA3MQ
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2018
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2018
issn 0143-814X
1469-7815
issn_str_mv 0143-814X
1469-7815
language English
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
match_str arelbundock2018conditionaltaxcompetitioninamericanstates
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Public Policy
source_id 49
title Conditional tax competition in American states
title_unstemmed Conditional tax competition in American states
title_full Conditional tax competition in American states
title_fullStr Conditional tax competition in American states
title_full_unstemmed Conditional tax competition in American states
title_short Conditional tax competition in American states
title_sort conditional tax competition in american states
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Public Administration
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x17000071
publishDate 2018
physical 191-220
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Cross-border commercial activity raises issues in federations where multiple jurisdictions can claim the right to tax the same income. In the United States, this coordination problem is resolved by splitting the tax base according to the geographic distribution of firms’ sales, capital and labour. The weight of each factor is determined on a state-by-state basis, which opens room for competitive legislative behaviour. In this complex issue area, however, policymakers must invest lot of resources to monitor competitors, evaluate policy alternatives and shepherd tax reform through the legislative process. This implies that highly professional legislatures should be more responsive to the policies of nearby states. We consider data on most American states over the period from 1986 to 2013 and find strong evidence of<jats:italic>conditional spatial dependence</jats:italic>. Our findings suggest that policy diffusion may often be moderated by institutional and political factors.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
container_title Journal of Public Policy
container_volume 38
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792347449132580879
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:55:27.82Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Conditional+tax+competition+in+American+states&rft.date=2018-06-01&genre=article&issn=1469-7815&volume=38&issue=2&spage=191&epage=220&pages=191-220&jtitle=Journal+of+Public+Policy&atitle=Conditional+tax+competition+in+American+states&aulast=Parinandi&aufirst=Srinivas&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fs0143814x17000071&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792347449132580879
author Arel-Bundock, Vincent, Parinandi, Srinivas
author_facet Arel-Bundock, Vincent, Parinandi, Srinivas, Arel-Bundock, Vincent, Parinandi, Srinivas
author_sort arel-bundock, vincent
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
container_title Journal of Public Policy
container_volume 38
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Cross-border commercial activity raises issues in federations where multiple jurisdictions can claim the right to tax the same income. In the United States, this coordination problem is resolved by splitting the tax base according to the geographic distribution of firms’ sales, capital and labour. The weight of each factor is determined on a state-by-state basis, which opens room for competitive legislative behaviour. In this complex issue area, however, policymakers must invest lot of resources to monitor competitors, evaluate policy alternatives and shepherd tax reform through the legislative process. This implies that highly professional legislatures should be more responsive to the policies of nearby states. We consider data on most American states over the period from 1986 to 2013 and find strong evidence of<jats:italic>conditional spatial dependence</jats:italic>. Our findings suggest that policy diffusion may often be moderated by institutional and political factors.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0143814x17000071
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDE0MzgxNHgxNzAwMDA3MQ
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2018
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2018
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0143-814X, 1469-7815
issn_str_mv 0143-814X, 1469-7815
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:55:27.82Z
match_str arelbundock2018conditionaltaxcompetitioninamericanstates
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
physical 191-220
publishDate 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Public Policy
source_id 49
spelling Arel-Bundock, Vincent Parinandi, Srinivas 0143-814X 1469-7815 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Public Administration http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x17000071 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Cross-border commercial activity raises issues in federations where multiple jurisdictions can claim the right to tax the same income. In the United States, this coordination problem is resolved by splitting the tax base according to the geographic distribution of firms’ sales, capital and labour. The weight of each factor is determined on a state-by-state basis, which opens room for competitive legislative behaviour. In this complex issue area, however, policymakers must invest lot of resources to monitor competitors, evaluate policy alternatives and shepherd tax reform through the legislative process. This implies that highly professional legislatures should be more responsive to the policies of nearby states. We consider data on most American states over the period from 1986 to 2013 and find strong evidence of<jats:italic>conditional spatial dependence</jats:italic>. Our findings suggest that policy diffusion may often be moderated by institutional and political factors.</jats:p> Conditional tax competition in American states Journal of Public Policy
spellingShingle Arel-Bundock, Vincent, Parinandi, Srinivas, Journal of Public Policy, Conditional tax competition in American states, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Public Administration
title Conditional tax competition in American states
title_full Conditional tax competition in American states
title_fullStr Conditional tax competition in American states
title_full_unstemmed Conditional tax competition in American states
title_short Conditional tax competition in American states
title_sort conditional tax competition in american states
title_unstemmed Conditional tax competition in American states
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Public Administration
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x17000071