Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | The Historical Journal |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | The Historical Journal, 30, 1987, 3, S. 735-736 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Ware, Richard Ware, Richard |
|---|---|
| author |
Ware, Richard |
| spellingShingle |
Ware, Richard The Historical Journal Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands History |
| author_sort |
ware, richard |
| spelling |
Ware, Richard 0018-246X 1469-5103 Cambridge University Press (CUP) History http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00020987 <jats:p>In response to John Muffty's critique of my communication concerning the case of Antonio Rivero, I would accept that my references to the whole document contained in P.R.O., HO 48/30 case 5 as ‘the opinion’ were misleading, given that most of it, as I noted in my original communication, consists of the presentation of the case. However, this is immaterial to the conclusion. The point is that the document contains statements which do not easily square with what was then the official British line on sovereignty over the Islands, namely that British sovereignty had been sustained ever since the evacuation of Port Egmont in 1774 by what Sir Herbert Jenner in 1829 had described as ‘the symbols of property and possession’, i.e. a single stone plaque. For example, the reference in the document to the attention of the British government having been ‘altogether withdrawn’ from the Islands between 1774 and 1829 seemed to me to suggest a sceptical view of Jenner's argument.</jats:p> Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands The Historical Journal |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1017/s0018246x00020987 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Geschichte |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDAxODI0NngwMDAyMDk4Nw |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDAxODI0NngwMDAyMDk4Nw |
| institution |
DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 |
| imprint |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
| issn |
0018-246X 1469-5103 |
| issn_str_mv |
0018-246X 1469-5103 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
ware1987replytoreflexionsonthecaseofantonioriveroandsovereigntyoverthefalklandislands |
| publishDateSort |
1987 |
| publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
The Historical Journal |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_unstemmed |
Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_full |
Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_fullStr |
Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_short |
Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_sort |
reply to reflexions on the case of antonio rivero and sovereignty over the falkland islands |
| topic |
History |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00020987 |
| publishDate |
1987 |
| physical |
735-736 |
| description |
<jats:p>In response to John Muffty's critique of my communication concerning the case of Antonio Rivero, I would accept that my references to the whole document contained in P.R.O., HO 48/30 case 5 as ‘the opinion’ were misleading, given that most of it, as I noted in my original communication, consists of the presentation of the case. However, this is immaterial to the conclusion. The point is that the document contains statements which do not easily square with what was then the official British line on sovereignty over the Islands, namely that British sovereignty had been sustained ever since the evacuation of Port Egmont in 1774 by what Sir Herbert Jenner in 1829 had described as ‘the symbols of property and possession’, i.e. a single stone plaque. For example, the reference in the document to the attention of the British government having been ‘altogether withdrawn’ from the Islands between 1774 and 1829 seemed to me to suggest a sceptical view of Jenner's argument.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
3 |
| container_start_page |
735 |
| container_title |
The Historical Journal |
| container_volume |
30 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792321132054970376 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T10:57:09.639Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Reply+to+Reflexions+on+the+case+of+Antonio+Rivero+and+Sovereignty+over+the+Falkland+Islands&rft.date=1987-09-01&genre=article&issn=1469-5103&volume=30&issue=3&spage=735&epage=736&pages=735-736&jtitle=The+Historical+Journal&atitle=Reply+to+Reflexions+on+the+case+of+Antonio+Rivero+and+Sovereignty+over+the+Falkland+Islands&aulast=Ware&aufirst=Richard&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fs0018246x00020987&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792321132054970376 |
| author | Ware, Richard |
| author_facet | Ware, Richard, Ware, Richard |
| author_sort | ware, richard |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 735 |
| container_title | The Historical Journal |
| container_volume | 30 |
| description | <jats:p>In response to John Muffty's critique of my communication concerning the case of Antonio Rivero, I would accept that my references to the whole document contained in P.R.O., HO 48/30 case 5 as ‘the opinion’ were misleading, given that most of it, as I noted in my original communication, consists of the presentation of the case. However, this is immaterial to the conclusion. The point is that the document contains statements which do not easily square with what was then the official British line on sovereignty over the Islands, namely that British sovereignty had been sustained ever since the evacuation of Port Egmont in 1774 by what Sir Herbert Jenner in 1829 had described as ‘the symbols of property and possession’, i.e. a single stone plaque. For example, the reference in the document to the attention of the British government having been ‘altogether withdrawn’ from the Islands between 1774 and 1829 seemed to me to suggest a sceptical view of Jenner's argument.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/s0018246x00020987 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Geschichte |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDAxODI0NngwMDAyMDk4Nw |
| imprint | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
| imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
| institution | DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1 |
| issn | 0018-246X, 1469-5103 |
| issn_str_mv | 0018-246X, 1469-5103 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T10:57:09.639Z |
| match_str | ware1987replytoreflexionsonthecaseofantonioriveroandsovereigntyoverthefalklandislands |
| mega_collection | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 735-736 |
| publishDate | 1987 |
| publishDateSort | 1987 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | The Historical Journal |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Ware, Richard 0018-246X 1469-5103 Cambridge University Press (CUP) History http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00020987 <jats:p>In response to John Muffty's critique of my communication concerning the case of Antonio Rivero, I would accept that my references to the whole document contained in P.R.O., HO 48/30 case 5 as ‘the opinion’ were misleading, given that most of it, as I noted in my original communication, consists of the presentation of the case. However, this is immaterial to the conclusion. The point is that the document contains statements which do not easily square with what was then the official British line on sovereignty over the Islands, namely that British sovereignty had been sustained ever since the evacuation of Port Egmont in 1774 by what Sir Herbert Jenner in 1829 had described as ‘the symbols of property and possession’, i.e. a single stone plaque. For example, the reference in the document to the attention of the British government having been ‘altogether withdrawn’ from the Islands between 1774 and 1829 seemed to me to suggest a sceptical view of Jenner's argument.</jats:p> Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands The Historical Journal |
| spellingShingle | Ware, Richard, The Historical Journal, Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, History |
| title | Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_full | Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_fullStr | Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_short | Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| title_sort | reply to reflexions on the case of antonio rivero and sovereignty over the falkland islands |
| title_unstemmed | Reply to Reflexions on the case of Antonio Rivero and Sovereignty over the Falkland Islands |
| topic | History |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00020987 |