author_facet Fleissner, Christine K.
Huebel, Nora
Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa
Loh, Gunnar
Klaus, Susanne
Blaut, Michael
Fleissner, Christine K.
Huebel, Nora
Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa
Loh, Gunnar
Klaus, Susanne
Blaut, Michael
author Fleissner, Christine K.
Huebel, Nora
Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa
Loh, Gunnar
Klaus, Susanne
Blaut, Michael
spellingShingle Fleissner, Christine K.
Huebel, Nora
Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa
Loh, Gunnar
Klaus, Susanne
Blaut, Michael
British Journal of Nutrition
Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
Nutrition and Dietetics
Medicine (miscellaneous)
author_sort fleissner, christine k.
spelling Fleissner, Christine K. Huebel, Nora Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa Loh, Gunnar Klaus, Susanne Blaut, Michael 0007-1145 1475-2662 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007114510001303 <jats:p>The gut microbiota has been implicated in host nutrient absorption and energy homeostasis. We studied the influence of different diets on body composition in germ-free (GF) and conventional (CV) mice. GF and CV male adult C3H mice were fed<jats:italic>ad libitum</jats:italic>a semi-synthetic low-fat diet (LFD; carbohydrate–protein–fat ratio: 41:42:17; 19·8 kJ/g), a high-fat diet (HFD; 41:16:43; 21·4 kJ/g) or a commercial Western diet (WD; 41:19:41; 21·5 kJ/g). There was no difference in body weight gain between GF and CV mice on the LFD. On the HFD, GF mice gained more body weight and body fat than CV mice, and had lower energy expenditure. GF mice on the WD gained significantly less body fat than GF mice on the HFD. GF mice on both HFD and WD showed increased intestinal mRNA expression of fasting-induced adipose factor/angiopoietin-like protein 4 (<jats:italic>Fiaf/Angptl4</jats:italic>), but they showed no major changes in circulating Fiaf/Angptl4 compared with CV mice. The faecal microbiota composition of the CV mice differed between diets: the proportion of Firmicutes increased on both HFD and WD at the expense of the Bacteroidetes. This increase in the Firmicutes was mainly due to the proliferation of one family within this phylum: the Erysipelotrichaceae. We conclude that the absence of gut microbiota does not provide a general protection from diet-induced obesity, that intestinal production of Fiaf/Angptl4 does not play a causal role in gut microbiota-mediated effects on fat storage and that diet composition affects gut microbial composition to larger extent than previously thought.</jats:p> Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity British Journal of Nutrition
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0007114510001303
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDAwNzExNDUxMDAwMTMwMw
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDAwNzExNDUxMDAwMTMwMw
institution DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010
issn 0007-1145
1475-2662
issn_str_mv 0007-1145
1475-2662
language English
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
match_str fleissner2010absenceofintestinalmicrobiotadoesnotprotectmicefromdietinducedobesity
publishDateSort 2010
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series British Journal of Nutrition
source_id 49
title Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_unstemmed Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_full Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_fullStr Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_full_unstemmed Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_short Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_sort absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
topic Nutrition and Dietetics
Medicine (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007114510001303
publishDate 2010
physical 919-929
description <jats:p>The gut microbiota has been implicated in host nutrient absorption and energy homeostasis. We studied the influence of different diets on body composition in germ-free (GF) and conventional (CV) mice. GF and CV male adult C3H mice were fed<jats:italic>ad libitum</jats:italic>a semi-synthetic low-fat diet (LFD; carbohydrate–protein–fat ratio: 41:42:17; 19·8 kJ/g), a high-fat diet (HFD; 41:16:43; 21·4 kJ/g) or a commercial Western diet (WD; 41:19:41; 21·5 kJ/g). There was no difference in body weight gain between GF and CV mice on the LFD. On the HFD, GF mice gained more body weight and body fat than CV mice, and had lower energy expenditure. GF mice on the WD gained significantly less body fat than GF mice on the HFD. GF mice on both HFD and WD showed increased intestinal mRNA expression of fasting-induced adipose factor/angiopoietin-like protein 4 (<jats:italic>Fiaf/Angptl4</jats:italic>), but they showed no major changes in circulating Fiaf/Angptl4 compared with CV mice. The faecal microbiota composition of the CV mice differed between diets: the proportion of Firmicutes increased on both HFD and WD at the expense of the Bacteroidetes. This increase in the Firmicutes was mainly due to the proliferation of one family within this phylum: the Erysipelotrichaceae. We conclude that the absence of gut microbiota does not provide a general protection from diet-induced obesity, that intestinal production of Fiaf/Angptl4 does not play a causal role in gut microbiota-mediated effects on fat storage and that diet composition affects gut microbial composition to larger extent than previously thought.</jats:p>
container_issue 6
container_start_page 919
container_title British Journal of Nutrition
container_volume 104
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792346219588091915
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:35:55.49Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Absence+of+intestinal+microbiota+does+not+protect+mice+from+diet-induced+obesity&rft.date=2010-09-28&genre=article&issn=1475-2662&volume=104&issue=6&spage=919&epage=929&pages=919-929&jtitle=British+Journal+of+Nutrition&atitle=Absence+of+intestinal+microbiota+does+not+protect+mice+from+diet-induced+obesity&aulast=Blaut&aufirst=Michael&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fs0007114510001303&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792346219588091915
author Fleissner, Christine K., Huebel, Nora, Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa, Loh, Gunnar, Klaus, Susanne, Blaut, Michael
author_facet Fleissner, Christine K., Huebel, Nora, Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa, Loh, Gunnar, Klaus, Susanne, Blaut, Michael, Fleissner, Christine K., Huebel, Nora, Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa, Loh, Gunnar, Klaus, Susanne, Blaut, Michael
author_sort fleissner, christine k.
container_issue 6
container_start_page 919
container_title British Journal of Nutrition
container_volume 104
description <jats:p>The gut microbiota has been implicated in host nutrient absorption and energy homeostasis. We studied the influence of different diets on body composition in germ-free (GF) and conventional (CV) mice. GF and CV male adult C3H mice were fed<jats:italic>ad libitum</jats:italic>a semi-synthetic low-fat diet (LFD; carbohydrate–protein–fat ratio: 41:42:17; 19·8 kJ/g), a high-fat diet (HFD; 41:16:43; 21·4 kJ/g) or a commercial Western diet (WD; 41:19:41; 21·5 kJ/g). There was no difference in body weight gain between GF and CV mice on the LFD. On the HFD, GF mice gained more body weight and body fat than CV mice, and had lower energy expenditure. GF mice on the WD gained significantly less body fat than GF mice on the HFD. GF mice on both HFD and WD showed increased intestinal mRNA expression of fasting-induced adipose factor/angiopoietin-like protein 4 (<jats:italic>Fiaf/Angptl4</jats:italic>), but they showed no major changes in circulating Fiaf/Angptl4 compared with CV mice. The faecal microbiota composition of the CV mice differed between diets: the proportion of Firmicutes increased on both HFD and WD at the expense of the Bacteroidetes. This increase in the Firmicutes was mainly due to the proliferation of one family within this phylum: the Erysipelotrichaceae. We conclude that the absence of gut microbiota does not provide a general protection from diet-induced obesity, that intestinal production of Fiaf/Angptl4 does not play a causal role in gut microbiota-mediated effects on fat storage and that diet composition affects gut microbial composition to larger extent than previously thought.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0007114510001303
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9zMDAwNzExNDUxMDAwMTMwMw
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010
institution DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15
issn 0007-1145, 1475-2662
issn_str_mv 0007-1145, 1475-2662
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:35:55.49Z
match_str fleissner2010absenceofintestinalmicrobiotadoesnotprotectmicefromdietinducedobesity
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
physical 919-929
publishDate 2010
publishDateSort 2010
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series British Journal of Nutrition
source_id 49
spelling Fleissner, Christine K. Huebel, Nora Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa Loh, Gunnar Klaus, Susanne Blaut, Michael 0007-1145 1475-2662 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007114510001303 <jats:p>The gut microbiota has been implicated in host nutrient absorption and energy homeostasis. We studied the influence of different diets on body composition in germ-free (GF) and conventional (CV) mice. GF and CV male adult C3H mice were fed<jats:italic>ad libitum</jats:italic>a semi-synthetic low-fat diet (LFD; carbohydrate–protein–fat ratio: 41:42:17; 19·8 kJ/g), a high-fat diet (HFD; 41:16:43; 21·4 kJ/g) or a commercial Western diet (WD; 41:19:41; 21·5 kJ/g). There was no difference in body weight gain between GF and CV mice on the LFD. On the HFD, GF mice gained more body weight and body fat than CV mice, and had lower energy expenditure. GF mice on the WD gained significantly less body fat than GF mice on the HFD. GF mice on both HFD and WD showed increased intestinal mRNA expression of fasting-induced adipose factor/angiopoietin-like protein 4 (<jats:italic>Fiaf/Angptl4</jats:italic>), but they showed no major changes in circulating Fiaf/Angptl4 compared with CV mice. The faecal microbiota composition of the CV mice differed between diets: the proportion of Firmicutes increased on both HFD and WD at the expense of the Bacteroidetes. This increase in the Firmicutes was mainly due to the proliferation of one family within this phylum: the Erysipelotrichaceae. We conclude that the absence of gut microbiota does not provide a general protection from diet-induced obesity, that intestinal production of Fiaf/Angptl4 does not play a causal role in gut microbiota-mediated effects on fat storage and that diet composition affects gut microbial composition to larger extent than previously thought.</jats:p> Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity British Journal of Nutrition
spellingShingle Fleissner, Christine K., Huebel, Nora, Abd El-Bary, Mohamed Mostafa, Loh, Gunnar, Klaus, Susanne, Blaut, Michael, British Journal of Nutrition, Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity, Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous)
title Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_full Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_fullStr Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_full_unstemmed Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_short Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_sort absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
title_unstemmed Absence of intestinal microbiota does not protect mice from diet-induced obesity
topic Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007114510001303