author_facet Hogan, David B.
Jetté, Nathalie
Fiest, Kirsten M.
Roberts, Jodie I.
Pearson, Dawn
Smith, Eric E.
Roach, Pamela
Kirk, Andrew
Pringsheim, Tamara
Maxwell, Colleen J.
Hogan, David B.
Jetté, Nathalie
Fiest, Kirsten M.
Roberts, Jodie I.
Pearson, Dawn
Smith, Eric E.
Roach, Pamela
Kirk, Andrew
Pringsheim, Tamara
Maxwell, Colleen J.
author Hogan, David B.
Jetté, Nathalie
Fiest, Kirsten M.
Roberts, Jodie I.
Pearson, Dawn
Smith, Eric E.
Roach, Pamela
Kirk, Andrew
Pringsheim, Tamara
Maxwell, Colleen J.
spellingShingle Hogan, David B.
Jetté, Nathalie
Fiest, Kirsten M.
Roberts, Jodie I.
Pearson, Dawn
Smith, Eric E.
Roach, Pamela
Kirk, Andrew
Pringsheim, Tamara
Maxwell, Colleen J.
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
Neurology (clinical)
Neurology
General Medicine
author_sort hogan, david b.
spelling Hogan, David B. Jetté, Nathalie Fiest, Kirsten M. Roberts, Jodie I. Pearson, Dawn Smith, Eric E. Roach, Pamela Kirk, Andrew Pringsheim, Tamara Maxwell, Colleen J. 0317-1671 2057-0155 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Neurology (clinical) Neurology General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.25 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based prevalence and incidence studies are essential for understanding the burden of frontotemporal dementia (FTD).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify population-based publications from 1985 to 2012, addressing the incidence and/or prevalence of FTD. References of included articles and prior systematic reviews were searched for additional studies. Two reviewers screened all abstracts and full-text reviews, abstracted data and performed quality assessments.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Twenty-six studies were included. Methodological limitations led to wide ranges in the estimates for prevalence (point prevalence 0.01-4.6 per 1000 persons; period prevalence 0.16-31.04 per 1000 persons) and incidence (0.0-0.3 per 1000 person-years). FTD accounted for an average of 2.7% (range 0-9.1%) of all dementia cases among prevalence studies that included subjects 65 and older compared to 10.2% (range 2.8-15.7%) in studies restricted to those aged less than 65. The cumulative numbers of male (373 [52.5%]) and female (338 [47.5%]) cases from studies reporting this information were nearly equal (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic>=0.18). The behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) was almost four times as common as the primary progressive aphasias.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs4" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based estimates for the epidemiology of FTD varied widely in the included studies. Refinements in the diagnostic process, possibly by the use of validated biomarkers or limiting case ascertainment to specialty services, are needed to obtain more precise estimates of the prevalence and incidence of FTD.</jats:p></jats:sec> The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
doi_str_mv 10.1017/cjn.2016.25
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9jam4uMjAxNi4yNQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9jam4uMjAxNi4yNQ
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016
issn 0317-1671
2057-0155
issn_str_mv 0317-1671
2057-0155
language English
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
match_str hogan2016theprevalenceandincidenceoffrontotemporaldementiaasystematicreview
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
source_id 49
title The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_unstemmed The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_full The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_short The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_sort the prevalence and incidence of frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review
topic Neurology (clinical)
Neurology
General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.25
publishDate 2016
physical S96-S109
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based prevalence and incidence studies are essential for understanding the burden of frontotemporal dementia (FTD).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify population-based publications from 1985 to 2012, addressing the incidence and/or prevalence of FTD. References of included articles and prior systematic reviews were searched for additional studies. Two reviewers screened all abstracts and full-text reviews, abstracted data and performed quality assessments.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Twenty-six studies were included. Methodological limitations led to wide ranges in the estimates for prevalence (point prevalence 0.01-4.6 per 1000 persons; period prevalence 0.16-31.04 per 1000 persons) and incidence (0.0-0.3 per 1000 person-years). FTD accounted for an average of 2.7% (range 0-9.1%) of all dementia cases among prevalence studies that included subjects 65 and older compared to 10.2% (range 2.8-15.7%) in studies restricted to those aged less than 65. The cumulative numbers of male (373 [52.5%]) and female (338 [47.5%]) cases from studies reporting this information were nearly equal (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic>=0.18). The behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) was almost four times as common as the primary progressive aphasias.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs4" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based estimates for the epidemiology of FTD varied widely in the included studies. Refinements in the diagnostic process, possibly by the use of validated biomarkers or limiting case ascertainment to specialty services, are needed to obtain more precise estimates of the prevalence and incidence of FTD.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
container_volume 43
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792344747131535363
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:12:30.071Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+Prevalence+and+Incidence+of+Frontotemporal+Dementia%3A+a+Systematic+Review&rft.date=2016-04-01&genre=article&issn=2057-0155&volume=43&issue=S1&pages=S96-S109&jtitle=Canadian+Journal+of+Neurological+Sciences+%2F+Journal+Canadien+des+Sciences+Neurologiques&atitle=The+Prevalence+and+Incidence+of+Frontotemporal+Dementia%3A+a+Systematic+Review&aulast=Maxwell&aufirst=Colleen+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fcjn.2016.25&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792344747131535363
author Hogan, David B., Jetté, Nathalie, Fiest, Kirsten M., Roberts, Jodie I., Pearson, Dawn, Smith, Eric E., Roach, Pamela, Kirk, Andrew, Pringsheim, Tamara, Maxwell, Colleen J.
author_facet Hogan, David B., Jetté, Nathalie, Fiest, Kirsten M., Roberts, Jodie I., Pearson, Dawn, Smith, Eric E., Roach, Pamela, Kirk, Andrew, Pringsheim, Tamara, Maxwell, Colleen J., Hogan, David B., Jetté, Nathalie, Fiest, Kirsten M., Roberts, Jodie I., Pearson, Dawn, Smith, Eric E., Roach, Pamela, Kirk, Andrew, Pringsheim, Tamara, Maxwell, Colleen J.
author_sort hogan, david b.
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
container_volume 43
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based prevalence and incidence studies are essential for understanding the burden of frontotemporal dementia (FTD).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify population-based publications from 1985 to 2012, addressing the incidence and/or prevalence of FTD. References of included articles and prior systematic reviews were searched for additional studies. Two reviewers screened all abstracts and full-text reviews, abstracted data and performed quality assessments.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Twenty-six studies were included. Methodological limitations led to wide ranges in the estimates for prevalence (point prevalence 0.01-4.6 per 1000 persons; period prevalence 0.16-31.04 per 1000 persons) and incidence (0.0-0.3 per 1000 person-years). FTD accounted for an average of 2.7% (range 0-9.1%) of all dementia cases among prevalence studies that included subjects 65 and older compared to 10.2% (range 2.8-15.7%) in studies restricted to those aged less than 65. The cumulative numbers of male (373 [52.5%]) and female (338 [47.5%]) cases from studies reporting this information were nearly equal (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic>=0.18). The behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) was almost four times as common as the primary progressive aphasias.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs4" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based estimates for the epidemiology of FTD varied widely in the included studies. Refinements in the diagnostic process, possibly by the use of validated biomarkers or limiting case ascertainment to specialty services, are needed to obtain more precise estimates of the prevalence and incidence of FTD.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1017/cjn.2016.25
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9jam4uMjAxNi4yNQ
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0317-1671, 2057-0155
issn_str_mv 0317-1671, 2057-0155
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:12:30.071Z
match_str hogan2016theprevalenceandincidenceoffrontotemporaldementiaasystematicreview
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
physical S96-S109
publishDate 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
source_id 49
spelling Hogan, David B. Jetté, Nathalie Fiest, Kirsten M. Roberts, Jodie I. Pearson, Dawn Smith, Eric E. Roach, Pamela Kirk, Andrew Pringsheim, Tamara Maxwell, Colleen J. 0317-1671 2057-0155 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Neurology (clinical) Neurology General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.25 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based prevalence and incidence studies are essential for understanding the burden of frontotemporal dementia (FTD).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify population-based publications from 1985 to 2012, addressing the incidence and/or prevalence of FTD. References of included articles and prior systematic reviews were searched for additional studies. Two reviewers screened all abstracts and full-text reviews, abstracted data and performed quality assessments.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Twenty-six studies were included. Methodological limitations led to wide ranges in the estimates for prevalence (point prevalence 0.01-4.6 per 1000 persons; period prevalence 0.16-31.04 per 1000 persons) and incidence (0.0-0.3 per 1000 person-years). FTD accounted for an average of 2.7% (range 0-9.1%) of all dementia cases among prevalence studies that included subjects 65 and older compared to 10.2% (range 2.8-15.7%) in studies restricted to those aged less than 65. The cumulative numbers of male (373 [52.5%]) and female (338 [47.5%]) cases from studies reporting this information were nearly equal (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic>=0.18). The behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) was almost four times as common as the primary progressive aphasias.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0317167116000251_abs4" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Population-based estimates for the epidemiology of FTD varied widely in the included studies. Refinements in the diagnostic process, possibly by the use of validated biomarkers or limiting case ascertainment to specialty services, are needed to obtain more precise estimates of the prevalence and incidence of FTD.</jats:p></jats:sec> The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
spellingShingle Hogan, David B., Jetté, Nathalie, Fiest, Kirsten M., Roberts, Jodie I., Pearson, Dawn, Smith, Eric E., Roach, Pamela, Kirk, Andrew, Pringsheim, Tamara, Maxwell, Colleen J., Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review, Neurology (clinical), Neurology, General Medicine
title The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_full The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_short The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
title_sort the prevalence and incidence of frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review
title_unstemmed The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
topic Neurology (clinical), Neurology, General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.25