Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Weed Technology |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , |
In: | Weed Technology, 33, 2019, 1, S. 147-152 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris |
---|---|
author |
Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris |
spellingShingle |
Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris Weed Technology Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds Plant Science Agronomy and Crop Science |
author_sort |
smith, stephen c. |
spelling |
Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris 0890-037X 1550-2740 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Plant Science Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p> Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds Weed Technology |
doi_str_mv |
10.1017/wet.2018.103 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Biologie Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy93ZXQuMjAxOC4xMDM |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy93ZXQuMjAxOC4xMDM |
institution |
DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 |
imprint |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019 |
issn |
0890-037X 1550-2740 |
issn_str_mv |
0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
smith2019toleranceofsweetpotatotoherbicidesappliedinplantpropagationbeds |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Weed Technology |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_unstemmed |
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_full |
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_fullStr |
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_short |
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_sort |
tolerance of sweetpotato to herbicides applied in plant propagation beds |
topic |
Plant Science Agronomy and Crop Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103 |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
147-152 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
147 |
container_title |
Weed Technology |
container_volume |
33 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792330433592033288 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T13:25:00.259Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Tolerance+of+Sweetpotato+to+Herbicides+Applied+in+Plant+Propagation+Beds&rft.date=2019-02-01&genre=article&issn=1550-2740&volume=33&issue=1&spage=147&epage=152&pages=147-152&jtitle=Weed+Technology&atitle=Tolerance+of+Sweetpotato+to+Herbicides+Applied+in+Plant+Propagation+Beds&aulast=Reberg-Horton&aufirst=S.+Chris&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fwet.2018.103&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792330433592033288 |
author | Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris |
author_facet | Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris, Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris |
author_sort | smith, stephen c. |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Weed Technology |
container_volume | 33 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2018.103 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Biologie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy93ZXQuMjAxOC4xMDM |
imprint | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019 |
imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019 |
institution | DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275 |
issn | 0890-037X, 1550-2740 |
issn_str_mv | 0890-037X, 1550-2740 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T13:25:00.259Z |
match_str | smith2019toleranceofsweetpotatotoherbicidesappliedinplantpropagationbeds |
mega_collection | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
physical | 147-152 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Weed Technology |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris 0890-037X 1550-2740 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Plant Science Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p> Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds Weed Technology |
spellingShingle | Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris, Weed Technology, Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science |
title | Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_full | Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_fullStr | Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_full_unstemmed | Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_short | Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
title_sort | tolerance of sweetpotato to herbicides applied in plant propagation beds |
title_unstemmed | Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds |
topic | Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103 |