author_facet Smith, Stephen C.
Jennings, Katherine M.
Monks, David W.
Schultheis, Jonathan R.
Reberg-Horton, S. Chris
Smith, Stephen C.
Jennings, Katherine M.
Monks, David W.
Schultheis, Jonathan R.
Reberg-Horton, S. Chris
author Smith, Stephen C.
Jennings, Katherine M.
Monks, David W.
Schultheis, Jonathan R.
Reberg-Horton, S. Chris
spellingShingle Smith, Stephen C.
Jennings, Katherine M.
Monks, David W.
Schultheis, Jonathan R.
Reberg-Horton, S. Chris
Weed Technology
Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
Plant Science
Agronomy and Crop Science
author_sort smith, stephen c.
spelling Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris 0890-037X 1550-2740 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Plant Science Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p> Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds Weed Technology
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2018.103
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Biologie
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy93ZXQuMjAxOC4xMDM
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy93ZXQuMjAxOC4xMDM
institution DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
issn_str_mv 0890-037X
1550-2740
language English
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
match_str smith2019toleranceofsweetpotatotoherbicidesappliedinplantpropagationbeds
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Weed Technology
source_id 49
title Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_unstemmed Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_full Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_fullStr Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_full_unstemmed Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_short Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_sort tolerance of sweetpotato to herbicides applied in plant propagation beds
topic Plant Science
Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103
publishDate 2019
physical 147-152
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 147
container_title Weed Technology
container_volume 33
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792330433592033288
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:25:00.259Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Tolerance+of+Sweetpotato+to+Herbicides+Applied+in+Plant+Propagation+Beds&rft.date=2019-02-01&genre=article&issn=1550-2740&volume=33&issue=1&spage=147&epage=152&pages=147-152&jtitle=Weed+Technology&atitle=Tolerance+of+Sweetpotato+to+Herbicides+Applied+in+Plant+Propagation+Beds&aulast=Reberg-Horton&aufirst=S.+Chris&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fwet.2018.103&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792330433592033288
author Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris
author_facet Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris, Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris
author_sort smith, stephen c.
container_issue 1
container_start_page 147
container_title Weed Technology
container_volume 33
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2018.103
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Biologie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy93ZXQuMjAxOC4xMDM
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
institution DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275
issn 0890-037X, 1550-2740
issn_str_mv 0890-037X, 1550-2740
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:25:00.259Z
match_str smith2019toleranceofsweetpotatotoherbicidesappliedinplantpropagationbeds
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
physical 147-152
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Weed Technology
source_id 49
spelling Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Schultheis, Jonathan R. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris 0890-037X 1550-2740 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Plant Science Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Field and greenhouse studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to herbicides applied to plant propagation beds. Herbicide treatments included PRE application of flumioxazin (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>),<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), flumioxazin plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (107 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fomesafen plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone (1,120 or 2,240 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), napropamide (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), clomazone (420 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), linuron plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor (560 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 800 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone (149 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pre-mix of flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone (81.8 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 104.2 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), or metribuzin (294 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Paraquat plus non-ionic surfactant (280 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ 0.25% v/v) POST was also included. After plants in the propagation bed were cut and sweetpotato slip number, length, and weight had been determined, the slips were then transplanted to containers and placed either in the greenhouse or on an outdoor pad to determine any effects from the herbicide treatments on initial sweetpotato growth. Sweetpotato slip number, length, and/or weight were affected by flumioxazin with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor,<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor with or without fomesafen, clomazone, and all fluridone treatments. In the greenhouse studies, initial root growth of plants after transplanting was inhibited by fluridone (1,120 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and fluridone plus<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor. However, by 5 wk after transplanting few differences were observed between treatments. Fomesafen, linuron with or without<jats:italic>S</jats:italic>-metolachlor, bicyclopyrone (38 or 49.7 g ai ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), pyroxasulfone with or without flumioxazin, metribuzin, and paraquat did not cause injury to sweetpotato slips in any of the studies conducted.</jats:p> Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds Weed Technology
spellingShingle Smith, Stephen C., Jennings, Katherine M., Monks, David W., Schultheis, Jonathan R., Reberg-Horton, S. Chris, Weed Technology, Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science
title Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_full Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_fullStr Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_full_unstemmed Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_short Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
title_sort tolerance of sweetpotato to herbicides applied in plant propagation beds
title_unstemmed Tolerance of Sweetpotato to Herbicides Applied in Plant Propagation Beds
topic Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.103