author_facet Mine, Shinji
Mine, Shinji
author Mine, Shinji
spellingShingle Mine, Shinji
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
Library and Information Sciences
General Computer Science
author_sort mine, shinji
spelling Mine, Shinji 2373-9231 2373-9231 Wiley Library and Information Sciences General Computer Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155 <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p> Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pra2.155
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcmEyLjE1NQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcmEyLjE1NQ
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
FID-BBI-DE-23
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
issn 2373-9231
issn_str_mv 2373-9231
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str mine2019towardresponsiblescholarlycommunicationandinnovationasurveyoftheprevalenceofretractedarticlesonscholarlycommunicationplatforms
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
source_id 49
title Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_unstemmed Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_full Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_fullStr Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_full_unstemmed Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_short Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_sort toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: a survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
topic Library and Information Sciences
General Computer Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155
publishDate 2019
physical 738-739
description <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 738
container_title Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
container_volume 56
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792333566678401036
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:14:47.928Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Toward+responsible+scholarly+communication+and+innovation%3A+A+survey+of+the+prevalence+of+retracted+articles+on+scholarly+communication+platforms&rft.date=2019-01-01&genre=article&issn=2373-9231&volume=56&issue=1&spage=738&epage=739&pages=738-739&jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+Association+for+Information+Science+and+Technology&atitle=Toward+responsible+scholarly+communication+and+innovation%3A+A+survey+of+the+prevalence+of+retracted+articles+on+scholarly+communication+platforms&aulast=Mine&aufirst=Shinji&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fpra2.155&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792333566678401036
author Mine, Shinji
author_facet Mine, Shinji, Mine, Shinji
author_sort mine, shinji
container_issue 1
container_start_page 738
container_title Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
container_volume 56
description <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pra2.155
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Allgemeines
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcmEyLjE1NQ
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, FID-BBI-DE-23, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 2373-9231
issn_str_mv 2373-9231
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:14:47.928Z
match_str mine2019towardresponsiblescholarlycommunicationandinnovationasurveyoftheprevalenceofretractedarticlesonscholarlycommunicationplatforms
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 738-739
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
source_id 49
spelling Mine, Shinji 2373-9231 2373-9231 Wiley Library and Information Sciences General Computer Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155 <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p> Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
spellingShingle Mine, Shinji, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms, Library and Information Sciences, General Computer Science
title Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_full Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_fullStr Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_full_unstemmed Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_short Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_sort toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: a survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
title_unstemmed Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
topic Library and Information Sciences, General Computer Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155