Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56, 2019, 1, S. 738-739 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Mine, Shinji Mine, Shinji |
---|---|
author |
Mine, Shinji |
spellingShingle |
Mine, Shinji Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms Library and Information Sciences General Computer Science |
author_sort |
mine, shinji |
spelling |
Mine, Shinji 2373-9231 2373-9231 Wiley Library and Information Sciences General Computer Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155 <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p> Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
doi_str_mv |
10.1002/pra2.155 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Allgemeines |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcmEyLjE1NQ |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcmEyLjE1NQ |
institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 FID-BBI-DE-23 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
imprint |
Wiley, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2019 |
issn |
2373-9231 |
issn_str_mv |
2373-9231 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
match_str |
mine2019towardresponsiblescholarlycommunicationandinnovationasurveyoftheprevalenceofretractedarticlesonscholarlycommunicationplatforms |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publisher |
Wiley |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_unstemmed |
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_full |
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_fullStr |
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_short |
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_sort |
toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: a survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
topic |
Library and Information Sciences General Computer Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155 |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
738-739 |
description |
<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
738 |
container_title |
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
container_volume |
56 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792333566678401036 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:14:47.928Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Toward+responsible+scholarly+communication+and+innovation%3A+A+survey+of+the+prevalence+of+retracted+articles+on+scholarly+communication+platforms&rft.date=2019-01-01&genre=article&issn=2373-9231&volume=56&issue=1&spage=738&epage=739&pages=738-739&jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+Association+for+Information+Science+and+Technology&atitle=Toward+responsible+scholarly+communication+and+innovation%3A+A+survey+of+the+prevalence+of+retracted+articles+on+scholarly+communication+platforms&aulast=Mine&aufirst=Shinji&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fpra2.155&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792333566678401036 |
author | Mine, Shinji |
author_facet | Mine, Shinji, Mine, Shinji |
author_sort | mine, shinji |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
container_volume | 56 |
description | <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pra2.155 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Allgemeines |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcmEyLjE1NQ |
imprint | Wiley, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2019 |
institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, FID-BBI-DE-23, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
issn | 2373-9231 |
issn_str_mv | 2373-9231 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:14:47.928Z |
match_str | mine2019towardresponsiblescholarlycommunicationandinnovationasurveyoftheprevalenceofretractedarticlesonscholarlycommunicationplatforms |
mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
physical | 738-739 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Mine, Shinji 2373-9231 2373-9231 Wiley Library and Information Sciences General Computer Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155 <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.</jats:p> Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
spellingShingle | Mine, Shinji, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms, Library and Information Sciences, General Computer Science |
title | Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_full | Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_fullStr | Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_full_unstemmed | Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_short | Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_sort | toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: a survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
title_unstemmed | Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms |
topic | Library and Information Sciences, General Computer Science |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.155 |