author_facet Ho, Daniel
Squelch, Andrew
Sun, Zhonghua
Ho, Daniel
Squelch, Andrew
Sun, Zhonghua
author Ho, Daniel
Squelch, Andrew
Sun, Zhonghua
spellingShingle Ho, Daniel
Squelch, Andrew
Sun, Zhonghua
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
author_sort ho, daniel
spelling Ho, Daniel Squelch, Andrew Sun, Zhonghua 2051-3895 2051-3909 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Radiological and Ultrasound Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.212 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can be accurately reproduced from a contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content>) scan into a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Contrast‐enhanced cardiac <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans from two patients were post‐processed and produced as 3D printed thoracic aorta models of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. The transverse diameter was measured at five anatomical landmarks for both models, compared across three stages: the original contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images, the stereolithography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">STL</jats:styled-content>) format computerised model prepared for 3D printing and the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> of the 3D printed model. For the model with aortic dissection, measurements of the true and false lumen were taken and compared at two points on the descending aorta.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Three‐dimensional printed models were generated with strong and flexible plastic material with successful replication of anatomical details of aortic structures and pathologies. The mean difference in transverse vessel diameter between the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images before and after 3D printing was 1.0 and 1.2 mm, for the first and second models respectively (standard deviation: 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm). Additionally, for the second model, the mean luminal diameter difference between the 3D printed model and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images was 0.5 mm.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Encouraging results were achieved with regards to reproducing 3D models depicting aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Variances in vessel diameter measurement outside a standard deviation of 1 mm tolerance indicate further work is required into the assessment and accuracy of 3D model reproduction.</jats:p></jats:sec> Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmrs.212
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
Technik
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9qbXJzLjIxMg
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9qbXJzLjIxMg
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
issn 2051-3895
2051-3909
issn_str_mv 2051-3895
2051-3909
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str ho2017modellingofaorticaneurysmandaorticdissectionthrough3dprinting
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
source_id 49
title Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_unstemmed Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_full Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_fullStr Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_full_unstemmed Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_short Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_sort modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3d printing
topic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.212
publishDate 2017
physical 10-17
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can be accurately reproduced from a contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content>) scan into a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Contrast‐enhanced cardiac <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans from two patients were post‐processed and produced as 3D printed thoracic aorta models of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. The transverse diameter was measured at five anatomical landmarks for both models, compared across three stages: the original contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images, the stereolithography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">STL</jats:styled-content>) format computerised model prepared for 3D printing and the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> of the 3D printed model. For the model with aortic dissection, measurements of the true and false lumen were taken and compared at two points on the descending aorta.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Three‐dimensional printed models were generated with strong and flexible plastic material with successful replication of anatomical details of aortic structures and pathologies. The mean difference in transverse vessel diameter between the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images before and after 3D printing was 1.0 and 1.2 mm, for the first and second models respectively (standard deviation: 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm). Additionally, for the second model, the mean luminal diameter difference between the 3D printed model and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images was 0.5 mm.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Encouraging results were achieved with regards to reproducing 3D models depicting aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Variances in vessel diameter measurement outside a standard deviation of 1 mm tolerance indicate further work is required into the assessment and accuracy of 3D model reproduction.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 10
container_title Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
container_volume 64
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792339652614553600
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:51:13.787Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Modelling+of+aortic+aneurysm+and+aortic+dissection+through+3D+printing&rft.date=2017-03-01&genre=article&issn=2051-3909&volume=64&issue=1&spage=10&epage=17&pages=10-17&jtitle=Journal+of+Medical+Radiation+Sciences&atitle=Modelling+of+aortic+aneurysm+and+aortic+dissection+through+3D+printing&aulast=Sun&aufirst=Zhonghua&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fjmrs.212&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792339652614553600
author Ho, Daniel, Squelch, Andrew, Sun, Zhonghua
author_facet Ho, Daniel, Squelch, Andrew, Sun, Zhonghua, Ho, Daniel, Squelch, Andrew, Sun, Zhonghua
author_sort ho, daniel
container_issue 1
container_start_page 10
container_title Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
container_volume 64
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can be accurately reproduced from a contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content>) scan into a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Contrast‐enhanced cardiac <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans from two patients were post‐processed and produced as 3D printed thoracic aorta models of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. The transverse diameter was measured at five anatomical landmarks for both models, compared across three stages: the original contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images, the stereolithography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">STL</jats:styled-content>) format computerised model prepared for 3D printing and the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> of the 3D printed model. For the model with aortic dissection, measurements of the true and false lumen were taken and compared at two points on the descending aorta.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Three‐dimensional printed models were generated with strong and flexible plastic material with successful replication of anatomical details of aortic structures and pathologies. The mean difference in transverse vessel diameter between the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images before and after 3D printing was 1.0 and 1.2 mm, for the first and second models respectively (standard deviation: 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm). Additionally, for the second model, the mean luminal diameter difference between the 3D printed model and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images was 0.5 mm.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Encouraging results were achieved with regards to reproducing 3D models depicting aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Variances in vessel diameter measurement outside a standard deviation of 1 mm tolerance indicate further work is required into the assessment and accuracy of 3D model reproduction.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmrs.212
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin, Technik, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9qbXJzLjIxMg
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2051-3895, 2051-3909
issn_str_mv 2051-3895, 2051-3909
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:51:13.787Z
match_str ho2017modellingofaorticaneurysmandaorticdissectionthrough3dprinting
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 10-17
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
source_id 49
spelling Ho, Daniel Squelch, Andrew Sun, Zhonghua 2051-3895 2051-3909 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Radiological and Ultrasound Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.212 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can be accurately reproduced from a contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content>) scan into a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Contrast‐enhanced cardiac <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> scans from two patients were post‐processed and produced as 3D printed thoracic aorta models of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. The transverse diameter was measured at five anatomical landmarks for both models, compared across three stages: the original contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images, the stereolithography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">STL</jats:styled-content>) format computerised model prepared for 3D printing and the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> of the 3D printed model. For the model with aortic dissection, measurements of the true and false lumen were taken and compared at two points on the descending aorta.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Three‐dimensional printed models were generated with strong and flexible plastic material with successful replication of anatomical details of aortic structures and pathologies. The mean difference in transverse vessel diameter between the contrast‐enhanced <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images before and after 3D printing was 1.0 and 1.2 mm, for the first and second models respectively (standard deviation: 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm). Additionally, for the second model, the mean luminal diameter difference between the 3D printed model and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> images was 0.5 mm.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Encouraging results were achieved with regards to reproducing 3D models depicting aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Variances in vessel diameter measurement outside a standard deviation of 1 mm tolerance indicate further work is required into the assessment and accuracy of 3D model reproduction.</jats:p></jats:sec> Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
spellingShingle Ho, Daniel, Squelch, Andrew, Sun, Zhonghua, Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
title Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_full Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_fullStr Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_full_unstemmed Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_short Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_sort modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3d printing
title_unstemmed Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
topic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.212