Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , |
| In: | Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 88, 2013, 5, S. 742-750 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Zagklis, Dimitris P. Arvaniti, Eleni C. Papadakis, Vagelis G. Paraskeva, Christakis A. Zagklis, Dimitris P. Arvaniti, Eleni C. Papadakis, Vagelis G. Paraskeva, Christakis A. |
|---|---|
| author |
Zagklis, Dimitris P. Arvaniti, Eleni C. Papadakis, Vagelis G. Paraskeva, Christakis A. |
| spellingShingle |
Zagklis, Dimitris P. Arvaniti, Eleni C. Papadakis, Vagelis G. Paraskeva, Christakis A. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods Inorganic Chemistry Organic Chemistry Pollution Waste Management and Disposal Fuel Technology Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment General Chemical Engineering Biotechnology |
| author_sort |
zagklis, dimitris p. |
| spelling |
Zagklis, Dimitris P. Arvaniti, Eleni C. Papadakis, Vagelis G. Paraskeva, Christakis A. 0268-2575 1097-4660 Wiley Inorganic Chemistry Organic Chemistry Pollution Waste Management and Disposal Fuel Technology Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment General Chemical Engineering Biotechnology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4036 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>A large number of publications are available in the literature regarding olive mill wastewater treatment methods. However, none of the proposed methods can be considered as a best available method in terms of its effectiveness, and its environmental and economic impact. Using a literature survey, data were collected and evaluated in order for a sustainability and benchmarking analysis to be developed. Physicochemical, biological and advanced oxidation methods were evaluated and judged in terms of their effectiveness, environmental impact and cost. Effectiveness of each method was estimated in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">COD</jats:styled-content> and phenolic compounds reduction, environmental impact in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> production, while for the economic impact the operational costs were taken into account. Finally, a procedure is suggested for selection of the most appropriate method based on user preferences (in terms of effectiveness, environmental impact and cost). The present analysis showed that the most effective processes in terms of organics reduction are membrane filtration, electrolysis, supercritical water oxidation and photo‐Fenton. Lower environmental impact was found with anaerobic digestion, coagulation and lime processes, while the lowest cost category involves biocomposting and membrane filtration, thanks to the exploitation of byproducts (biocompost and phenolic compounds, respectively). © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry</jats:bold></jats:p> Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/jctb.4036 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Chemie und Pharmazie Geographie Technik Biologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9qY3RiLjQwMzY |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9qY3RiLjQwMzY |
| institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2013 |
| issn |
0268-2575 1097-4660 |
| issn_str_mv |
0268-2575 1097-4660 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
zagklis2013sustainabilityanalysisandbenchmarkingofolivemillwastewatertreatmentmethods |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_unstemmed |
Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_full |
Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_fullStr |
Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_short |
Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_sort |
sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| topic |
Inorganic Chemistry Organic Chemistry Pollution Waste Management and Disposal Fuel Technology Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment General Chemical Engineering Biotechnology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4036 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| physical |
742-750 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>A large number of publications are available in the literature regarding olive mill wastewater treatment methods. However, none of the proposed methods can be considered as a best available method in terms of its effectiveness, and its environmental and economic impact. Using a literature survey, data were collected and evaluated in order for a sustainability and benchmarking analysis to be developed. Physicochemical, biological and advanced oxidation methods were evaluated and judged in terms of their effectiveness, environmental impact and cost. Effectiveness of each method was estimated in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">COD</jats:styled-content> and phenolic compounds reduction, environmental impact in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> production, while for the economic impact the operational costs were taken into account. Finally, a procedure is suggested for selection of the most appropriate method based on user preferences (in terms of effectiveness, environmental impact and cost). The present analysis showed that the most effective processes in terms of organics reduction are membrane filtration, electrolysis, supercritical water oxidation and photo‐Fenton. Lower environmental impact was found with anaerobic digestion, coagulation and lime processes, while the lowest cost category involves biocomposting and membrane filtration, thanks to the exploitation of byproducts (biocompost and phenolic compounds, respectively). © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry</jats:bold></jats:p> |
| container_issue |
5 |
| container_start_page |
742 |
| container_title |
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
| container_volume |
88 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792341950933762050 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:28:03.657Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Sustainability+analysis+and+benchmarking+of+olive+mill+wastewater+treatment+methods&rft.date=2013-05-01&genre=article&issn=1097-4660&volume=88&issue=5&spage=742&epage=750&pages=742-750&jtitle=Journal+of+Chemical+Technology+%26+Biotechnology&atitle=Sustainability+analysis+and+benchmarking+of+olive+mill+wastewater+treatment+methods&aulast=Paraskeva&aufirst=Christakis+A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fjctb.4036&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792341950933762050 |
| author | Zagklis, Dimitris P., Arvaniti, Eleni C., Papadakis, Vagelis G., Paraskeva, Christakis A. |
| author_facet | Zagklis, Dimitris P., Arvaniti, Eleni C., Papadakis, Vagelis G., Paraskeva, Christakis A., Zagklis, Dimitris P., Arvaniti, Eleni C., Papadakis, Vagelis G., Paraskeva, Christakis A. |
| author_sort | zagklis, dimitris p. |
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 742 |
| container_title | Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
| container_volume | 88 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>A large number of publications are available in the literature regarding olive mill wastewater treatment methods. However, none of the proposed methods can be considered as a best available method in terms of its effectiveness, and its environmental and economic impact. Using a literature survey, data were collected and evaluated in order for a sustainability and benchmarking analysis to be developed. Physicochemical, biological and advanced oxidation methods were evaluated and judged in terms of their effectiveness, environmental impact and cost. Effectiveness of each method was estimated in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">COD</jats:styled-content> and phenolic compounds reduction, environmental impact in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> production, while for the economic impact the operational costs were taken into account. Finally, a procedure is suggested for selection of the most appropriate method based on user preferences (in terms of effectiveness, environmental impact and cost). The present analysis showed that the most effective processes in terms of organics reduction are membrane filtration, electrolysis, supercritical water oxidation and photo‐Fenton. Lower environmental impact was found with anaerobic digestion, coagulation and lime processes, while the lowest cost category involves biocomposting and membrane filtration, thanks to the exploitation of byproducts (biocompost and phenolic compounds, respectively). © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry</jats:bold></jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jctb.4036 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Chemie und Pharmazie, Geographie, Technik, Biologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9qY3RiLjQwMzY |
| imprint | Wiley, 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2013 |
| institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 0268-2575, 1097-4660 |
| issn_str_mv | 0268-2575, 1097-4660 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:28:03.657Z |
| match_str | zagklis2013sustainabilityanalysisandbenchmarkingofolivemillwastewatertreatmentmethods |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 742-750 |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Zagklis, Dimitris P. Arvaniti, Eleni C. Papadakis, Vagelis G. Paraskeva, Christakis A. 0268-2575 1097-4660 Wiley Inorganic Chemistry Organic Chemistry Pollution Waste Management and Disposal Fuel Technology Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment General Chemical Engineering Biotechnology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4036 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>A large number of publications are available in the literature regarding olive mill wastewater treatment methods. However, none of the proposed methods can be considered as a best available method in terms of its effectiveness, and its environmental and economic impact. Using a literature survey, data were collected and evaluated in order for a sustainability and benchmarking analysis to be developed. Physicochemical, biological and advanced oxidation methods were evaluated and judged in terms of their effectiveness, environmental impact and cost. Effectiveness of each method was estimated in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">COD</jats:styled-content> and phenolic compounds reduction, environmental impact in terms of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> production, while for the economic impact the operational costs were taken into account. Finally, a procedure is suggested for selection of the most appropriate method based on user preferences (in terms of effectiveness, environmental impact and cost). The present analysis showed that the most effective processes in terms of organics reduction are membrane filtration, electrolysis, supercritical water oxidation and photo‐Fenton. Lower environmental impact was found with anaerobic digestion, coagulation and lime processes, while the lowest cost category involves biocomposting and membrane filtration, thanks to the exploitation of byproducts (biocompost and phenolic compounds, respectively). © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry</jats:bold></jats:p> Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
| spellingShingle | Zagklis, Dimitris P., Arvaniti, Eleni C., Papadakis, Vagelis G., Paraskeva, Christakis A., Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods, Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Pollution, Waste Management and Disposal, Fuel Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, General Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology |
| title | Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_full | Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_fullStr | Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_short | Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_sort | sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| title_unstemmed | Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods |
| topic | Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Pollution, Waste Management and Disposal, Fuel Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, General Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4036 |