Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | European Journal of Social Psychology |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 2002, 3, S. 353-362 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Werth, Lioba Förster, Jens Werth, Lioba Förster, Jens |
|---|---|
| author |
Werth, Lioba Förster, Jens |
| spellingShingle |
Werth, Lioba Förster, Jens European Journal of Social Psychology Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used Social Psychology |
| author_sort |
werth, lioba |
| spelling |
Werth, Lioba Förster, Jens 0046-2772 1099-0992 Wiley Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.95 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This work focuses on the influence of implicit theories on recognition judgments. We argue that to understand how a recognition task is solved, it is necessary to study inferential processes because individuals might use their metamnestic knowledge (‘I would have known that!’) as a basis for replacing missing recollective experiences with inferential processes (Strack & Bless, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib33">1994</jats:ext-link>). In the present study, individuals' preexisting implicit personality theory (Dweck, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib7">1996</jats:ext-link>) was measured and was identified as a moderating variable for the use of metamnestic knowledge. After participants had studied word lists their metamnestic knowledge concerning these lists was manipulated. The results of a subsequent recognition task revealed that individuals used these metacognitively based inferences only when they assumed personal stability (‘entity theory’). Participants who believed in personal variability (‘incremental theory’) did not draw similar inferences when recollective experiences were missing. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used European Journal of Social Psychology |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/ejsp.95 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Psychologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9lanNwLjk1 |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9lanNwLjk1 |
| institution |
DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2002 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2002 |
| issn |
0046-2772 1099-0992 |
| issn_str_mv |
0046-2772 1099-0992 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
werth2002implicitpersontheoriesinfluencememoryjudgmentsthecircumstancesunderwhichmetacognitiveknowledgeisused |
| publishDateSort |
2002 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
European Journal of Social Psychology |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_unstemmed |
Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_full |
Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_fullStr |
Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_short |
Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_sort |
implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| topic |
Social Psychology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.95 |
| publishDate |
2002 |
| physical |
353-362 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This work focuses on the influence of implicit theories on recognition judgments. We argue that to understand how a recognition task is solved, it is necessary to study inferential processes because individuals might use their metamnestic knowledge (‘I would have known that!’) as a basis for replacing missing recollective experiences with inferential processes (Strack & Bless, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib33">1994</jats:ext-link>). In the present study, individuals' preexisting implicit personality theory (Dweck, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib7">1996</jats:ext-link>) was measured and was identified as a moderating variable for the use of metamnestic knowledge. After participants had studied word lists their metamnestic knowledge concerning these lists was manipulated. The results of a subsequent recognition task revealed that individuals used these metacognitively based inferences only when they assumed personal stability (‘entity theory’). Participants who believed in personal variability (‘incremental theory’) did not draw similar inferences when recollective experiences were missing. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
3 |
| container_start_page |
353 |
| container_title |
European Journal of Social Psychology |
| container_volume |
32 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792339152846454786 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:43:30.893Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Implicit+person+theories+influence+memory+judgments%3A+the+circumstances+under+which+metacognitive+knowledge+is+used&rft.date=2002-05-01&genre=article&issn=1099-0992&volume=32&issue=3&spage=353&epage=362&pages=353-362&jtitle=European+Journal+of+Social+Psychology&atitle=Implicit+person+theories+influence+memory+judgments%3A+the+circumstances+under+which+metacognitive+knowledge+is+used&aulast=F%C3%B6rster&aufirst=Jens&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fejsp.95&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792339152846454786 |
| author | Werth, Lioba, Förster, Jens |
| author_facet | Werth, Lioba, Förster, Jens, Werth, Lioba, Förster, Jens |
| author_sort | werth, lioba |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 353 |
| container_title | European Journal of Social Psychology |
| container_volume | 32 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This work focuses on the influence of implicit theories on recognition judgments. We argue that to understand how a recognition task is solved, it is necessary to study inferential processes because individuals might use their metamnestic knowledge (‘I would have known that!’) as a basis for replacing missing recollective experiences with inferential processes (Strack & Bless, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib33">1994</jats:ext-link>). In the present study, individuals' preexisting implicit personality theory (Dweck, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib7">1996</jats:ext-link>) was measured and was identified as a moderating variable for the use of metamnestic knowledge. After participants had studied word lists their metamnestic knowledge concerning these lists was manipulated. The results of a subsequent recognition task revealed that individuals used these metacognitively based inferences only when they assumed personal stability (‘entity theory’). Participants who believed in personal variability (‘incremental theory’) did not draw similar inferences when recollective experiences were missing. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ejsp.95 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Psychologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9lanNwLjk1 |
| imprint | Wiley, 2002 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2002 |
| institution | DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 0046-2772, 1099-0992 |
| issn_str_mv | 0046-2772, 1099-0992 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:43:30.893Z |
| match_str | werth2002implicitpersontheoriesinfluencememoryjudgmentsthecircumstancesunderwhichmetacognitiveknowledgeisused |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 353-362 |
| publishDate | 2002 |
| publishDateSort | 2002 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | European Journal of Social Psychology |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Werth, Lioba Förster, Jens 0046-2772 1099-0992 Wiley Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.95 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This work focuses on the influence of implicit theories on recognition judgments. We argue that to understand how a recognition task is solved, it is necessary to study inferential processes because individuals might use their metamnestic knowledge (‘I would have known that!’) as a basis for replacing missing recollective experiences with inferential processes (Strack & Bless, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib33">1994</jats:ext-link>). In the present study, individuals' preexisting implicit personality theory (Dweck, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#bib7">1996</jats:ext-link>) was measured and was identified as a moderating variable for the use of metamnestic knowledge. After participants had studied word lists their metamnestic knowledge concerning these lists was manipulated. The results of a subsequent recognition task revealed that individuals used these metacognitively based inferences only when they assumed personal stability (‘entity theory’). Participants who believed in personal variability (‘incremental theory’) did not draw similar inferences when recollective experiences were missing. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used European Journal of Social Psychology |
| spellingShingle | Werth, Lioba, Förster, Jens, European Journal of Social Psychology, Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used, Social Psychology |
| title | Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_full | Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_fullStr | Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_short | Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_sort | implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| title_unstemmed | Implicit person theories influence memory judgments: the circumstances under which metacognitive knowledge is used |
| topic | Social Psychology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.95 |