Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | European Journal of Social Psychology |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 2008, 2, S. 272-279 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Tostain, Manuel Lebreuilly, Joëlle Tostain, Manuel Lebreuilly, Joëlle |
|---|---|
| author |
Tostain, Manuel Lebreuilly, Joëlle |
| spellingShingle |
Tostain, Manuel Lebreuilly, Joëlle European Journal of Social Psychology Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ Social Psychology |
| author_sort |
tostain, manuel |
| spelling |
Tostain, Manuel Lebreuilly, Joëlle 0046-2772 1099-0992 Wiley Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.404 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) <jats:italic>a rational model</jats:italic> for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) <jats:italic>a justification model</jats:italic> for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ European Journal of Social Psychology |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/ejsp.404 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Psychologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9lanNwLjQwNA |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9lanNwLjQwNA |
| institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2008 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2008 |
| issn |
0046-2772 1099-0992 |
| issn_str_mv |
0046-2772 1099-0992 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
tostain2008rationalmodelandjustificationmodelinoutcomebias |
| publishDateSort |
2008 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
European Journal of Social Psychology |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_unstemmed |
Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_full |
Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_fullStr |
Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_short |
Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_sort |
rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| topic |
Social Psychology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.404 |
| publishDate |
2008 |
| physical |
272-279 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) <jats:italic>a rational model</jats:italic> for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) <jats:italic>a justification model</jats:italic> for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
272 |
| container_title |
European Journal of Social Psychology |
| container_volume |
38 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792338351960883201 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:30:37.721Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Rational+model+and+justification+model+in+%E2%80%98outcome+bias%E2%80%99&rft.date=2008-03-01&genre=article&issn=1099-0992&volume=38&issue=2&spage=272&epage=279&pages=272-279&jtitle=European+Journal+of+Social+Psychology&atitle=Rational+model+and+justification+model+in+%E2%80%98outcome+bias%E2%80%99&aulast=Lebreuilly&aufirst=Jo%C3%ABlle&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fejsp.404&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792338351960883201 |
| author | Tostain, Manuel, Lebreuilly, Joëlle |
| author_facet | Tostain, Manuel, Lebreuilly, Joëlle, Tostain, Manuel, Lebreuilly, Joëlle |
| author_sort | tostain, manuel |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 272 |
| container_title | European Journal of Social Psychology |
| container_volume | 38 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) <jats:italic>a rational model</jats:italic> for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) <jats:italic>a justification model</jats:italic> for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ejsp.404 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Psychologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9lanNwLjQwNA |
| imprint | Wiley, 2008 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2008 |
| institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 0046-2772, 1099-0992 |
| issn_str_mv | 0046-2772, 1099-0992 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:30:37.721Z |
| match_str | tostain2008rationalmodelandjustificationmodelinoutcomebias |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 272-279 |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | European Journal of Social Psychology |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Tostain, Manuel Lebreuilly, Joëlle 0046-2772 1099-0992 Wiley Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.404 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The authors of this study suggest that the harm‐punishment link (‘outcome bias’) can be explained by the activation of different judgment processes depending on the outcome severity of an offense: (1) <jats:italic>a rational model</jats:italic> for mild outcomes in which punishment is necessarily linked to responsibility of the perpetrator; (2) <jats:italic>a justification model</jats:italic> for severe outcomes in which punishment and responsibility are linked only when assessment order allows the latter to rationalize the former. Participants (126 university students) considered an unintentional road accident with mild or severe outcomes and made judgments of responsibility, punishment, and perceived seriousness of the offense. The results support the authors' hypothesis. In the discussion, the authors suggest different motives of punishment (preventive or compensative justice) which explain why responsibility and punishment are not necessarily linked. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p> Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ European Journal of Social Psychology |
| spellingShingle | Tostain, Manuel, Lebreuilly, Joëlle, European Journal of Social Psychology, Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’, Social Psychology |
| title | Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_full | Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_fullStr | Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_short | Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_sort | rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| title_unstemmed | Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ |
| topic | Social Psychology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.404 |