author_facet Sgualdino, G.
Vaccari, G.
Mantovani, G.
Aquilano, D.
Sgualdino, G.
Vaccari, G.
Mantovani, G.
Aquilano, D.
author Sgualdino, G.
Vaccari, G.
Mantovani, G.
Aquilano, D.
spellingShingle Sgualdino, G.
Vaccari, G.
Mantovani, G.
Aquilano, D.
Crystal Research and Technology
Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
Condensed Matter Physics
General Materials Science
General Chemistry
author_sort sgualdino, g.
spelling Sgualdino, G. Vaccari, G. Mantovani, G. Aquilano, D. 0232-1300 1521-4079 Wiley Condensed Matter Physics General Materials Science General Chemistry http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crat.2170320807 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Experimental evidences show that α‐D‐glucose and β‐D‐fructose work as habit‐modifiers of sucrose crystals grown from aqueous solutions at high concentration only. Their ability to affect the sucrose habit is examined from structural point of view, through stereochemical analysis of both additive molecules and surface sites on some significant polar and non‐polar forms of sucrose crystal. We referred to the classical TLK (terraces, ledges, kinks) model and restricted the adsorption interactions to the H‐bondings only. Notwithstanding the simple qualitative model we adopted, our method of analysis appears satisfactory to interpret analogies and differences in selectivity between glucose and fructose. However, it is not able to explain why the additive concentrations, needed to induce macroscopic effects. are so high. To clear this aspect, we assumed a behaviour as “disruption tailor‐made additives” for both monosaccharides. Finally, sucrose crystals grown in the presence of equimolecular mixture of glucose and fructose (50 + 50 g/100 g H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O), examined by X‐ray powder diffractometry, show the systematic splitting of main diffraction peaks; the systematic effect reveals the influence of both impurities on the bulk structure of sucrose crystal.</jats:p> Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers Crystal Research and Technology
doi_str_mv 10.1002/crat.2170320807
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jcmF0LjIxNzAzMjA4MDc
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jcmF0LjIxNzAzMjA4MDc
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 1997
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1997
issn 0232-1300
1521-4079
issn_str_mv 0232-1300
1521-4079
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str sgualdino1997glucoseandfructoseadsorptiononsucrosecrystalstheirroleashabitmodifiers
publishDateSort 1997
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Crystal Research and Technology
source_id 49
title Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_unstemmed Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_full Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_fullStr Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_full_unstemmed Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_short Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_sort glucose and fructose adsorption on sucrose crystals. their role as habit‐modifiers
topic Condensed Matter Physics
General Materials Science
General Chemistry
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crat.2170320807
publishDate 1997
physical 1057-1065
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Experimental evidences show that α‐D‐glucose and β‐D‐fructose work as habit‐modifiers of sucrose crystals grown from aqueous solutions at high concentration only. Their ability to affect the sucrose habit is examined from structural point of view, through stereochemical analysis of both additive molecules and surface sites on some significant polar and non‐polar forms of sucrose crystal. We referred to the classical TLK (terraces, ledges, kinks) model and restricted the adsorption interactions to the H‐bondings only. Notwithstanding the simple qualitative model we adopted, our method of analysis appears satisfactory to interpret analogies and differences in selectivity between glucose and fructose. However, it is not able to explain why the additive concentrations, needed to induce macroscopic effects. are so high. To clear this aspect, we assumed a behaviour as “disruption tailor‐made additives” for both monosaccharides. Finally, sucrose crystals grown in the presence of equimolecular mixture of glucose and fructose (50 + 50 g/100 g H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O), examined by X‐ray powder diffractometry, show the systematic splitting of main diffraction peaks; the systematic effect reveals the influence of both impurities on the bulk structure of sucrose crystal.</jats:p>
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1057
container_title Crystal Research and Technology
container_volume 32
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792336917578121230
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:07:06.556Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Glucose+and+Fructose+Adsorption+on+Sucrose+Crystals.+Their+Role+as+Habit%E2%80%90Modifiers&rft.date=1997-01-01&genre=article&issn=1521-4079&volume=32&issue=8&spage=1057&epage=1065&pages=1057-1065&jtitle=Crystal+Research+and+Technology&atitle=Glucose+and+Fructose+Adsorption+on+Sucrose+Crystals.+Their+Role+as+Habit%E2%80%90Modifiers&aulast=Aquilano&aufirst=D.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fcrat.2170320807&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792336917578121230
author Sgualdino, G., Vaccari, G., Mantovani, G., Aquilano, D.
author_facet Sgualdino, G., Vaccari, G., Mantovani, G., Aquilano, D., Sgualdino, G., Vaccari, G., Mantovani, G., Aquilano, D.
author_sort sgualdino, g.
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1057
container_title Crystal Research and Technology
container_volume 32
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Experimental evidences show that α‐D‐glucose and β‐D‐fructose work as habit‐modifiers of sucrose crystals grown from aqueous solutions at high concentration only. Their ability to affect the sucrose habit is examined from structural point of view, through stereochemical analysis of both additive molecules and surface sites on some significant polar and non‐polar forms of sucrose crystal. We referred to the classical TLK (terraces, ledges, kinks) model and restricted the adsorption interactions to the H‐bondings only. Notwithstanding the simple qualitative model we adopted, our method of analysis appears satisfactory to interpret analogies and differences in selectivity between glucose and fructose. However, it is not able to explain why the additive concentrations, needed to induce macroscopic effects. are so high. To clear this aspect, we assumed a behaviour as “disruption tailor‐made additives” for both monosaccharides. Finally, sucrose crystals grown in the presence of equimolecular mixture of glucose and fructose (50 + 50 g/100 g H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O), examined by X‐ray powder diffractometry, show the systematic splitting of main diffraction peaks; the systematic effect reveals the influence of both impurities on the bulk structure of sucrose crystal.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/crat.2170320807
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jcmF0LjIxNzAzMjA4MDc
imprint Wiley, 1997
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1997
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 0232-1300, 1521-4079
issn_str_mv 0232-1300, 1521-4079
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:07:06.556Z
match_str sgualdino1997glucoseandfructoseadsorptiononsucrosecrystalstheirroleashabitmodifiers
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 1057-1065
publishDate 1997
publishDateSort 1997
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Crystal Research and Technology
source_id 49
spelling Sgualdino, G. Vaccari, G. Mantovani, G. Aquilano, D. 0232-1300 1521-4079 Wiley Condensed Matter Physics General Materials Science General Chemistry http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crat.2170320807 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Experimental evidences show that α‐D‐glucose and β‐D‐fructose work as habit‐modifiers of sucrose crystals grown from aqueous solutions at high concentration only. Their ability to affect the sucrose habit is examined from structural point of view, through stereochemical analysis of both additive molecules and surface sites on some significant polar and non‐polar forms of sucrose crystal. We referred to the classical TLK (terraces, ledges, kinks) model and restricted the adsorption interactions to the H‐bondings only. Notwithstanding the simple qualitative model we adopted, our method of analysis appears satisfactory to interpret analogies and differences in selectivity between glucose and fructose. However, it is not able to explain why the additive concentrations, needed to induce macroscopic effects. are so high. To clear this aspect, we assumed a behaviour as “disruption tailor‐made additives” for both monosaccharides. Finally, sucrose crystals grown in the presence of equimolecular mixture of glucose and fructose (50 + 50 g/100 g H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O), examined by X‐ray powder diffractometry, show the systematic splitting of main diffraction peaks; the systematic effect reveals the influence of both impurities on the bulk structure of sucrose crystal.</jats:p> Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers Crystal Research and Technology
spellingShingle Sgualdino, G., Vaccari, G., Mantovani, G., Aquilano, D., Crystal Research and Technology, Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers, Condensed Matter Physics, General Materials Science, General Chemistry
title Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_full Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_fullStr Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_full_unstemmed Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_short Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
title_sort glucose and fructose adsorption on sucrose crystals. their role as habit‐modifiers
title_unstemmed Glucose and Fructose Adsorption on Sucrose Crystals. Their Role as Habit‐Modifiers
topic Condensed Matter Physics, General Materials Science, General Chemistry
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crat.2170320807