author_facet Vieira, Ana R.
Vingeliene, Snieguole
Chan, Doris S. M.
Aune, Dagfinn
Abar, Leila
Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah
Greenwood, Darren C.
Norat, Teresa
Vieira, Ana R.
Vingeliene, Snieguole
Chan, Doris S. M.
Aune, Dagfinn
Abar, Leila
Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah
Greenwood, Darren C.
Norat, Teresa
author Vieira, Ana R.
Vingeliene, Snieguole
Chan, Doris S. M.
Aune, Dagfinn
Abar, Leila
Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah
Greenwood, Darren C.
Norat, Teresa
spellingShingle Vieira, Ana R.
Vingeliene, Snieguole
Chan, Doris S. M.
Aune, Dagfinn
Abar, Leila
Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah
Greenwood, Darren C.
Norat, Teresa
Cancer Medicine
Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Cancer Research
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Oncology
author_sort vieira, ana r.
spelling Vieira, Ana R. Vingeliene, Snieguole Chan, Doris S. M. Aune, Dagfinn Abar, Leila Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah Greenwood, Darren C. Norat, Teresa 2045-7634 2045-7634 Wiley Cancer Research Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.327 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Smoking is estimated to cause about half of all bladder cancer cases. Case–control studies have provided evidence of an inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and bladder cancer risk. As part of the World Cancer Research/American Institute for Cancer Research Continuous Update Project, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective studies to assess the dose–response relationship between fruit and vegetables and incidence and mortality of bladder cancer. We searched PubMed up to December 2013 for relevant prospective studies. We conducted highest compared with lowest meta‐analyses and dose–response meta‐analyses using random effects models to estimate summary relative risks (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content>s) and 95% confidence intervals (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>s), and used restricted cubic splines to examine possible nonlinear associations. Fifteen prospective studies were included in the review. The summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for an increase of 1 serving/day (80 g) were 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.95–0.99) <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies for fruits and vegetables, 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.94–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 10%, 10 studies) for vegetables and 0.98 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.96–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, 12 studies) for fruits. Results were similar in men and women and in current, former and nonsmokers. Amongst fruits and vegetables subgroups, for citrus fruits the summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for the highest compared with the lowest intake was 0.87 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.76–0.99, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies) and for cruciferous vegetables there was evidence of a nonlinear relationship (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.001). The current evidence from cohort studies is not consistent with a role for fruits and vegetables in preventing bladder cancer.</jats:p> Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Cancer Medicine
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cam4.327
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jYW00LjMyNw
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jYW00LjMyNw
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2015
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2015
issn 2045-7634
issn_str_mv 2045-7634
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str vieira2015fruitsvegetablesandbladdercancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Cancer Medicine
source_id 49
title Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_unstemmed Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Cancer Research
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.327
publishDate 2015
physical 136-146
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Smoking is estimated to cause about half of all bladder cancer cases. Case–control studies have provided evidence of an inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and bladder cancer risk. As part of the World Cancer Research/American Institute for Cancer Research Continuous Update Project, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective studies to assess the dose–response relationship between fruit and vegetables and incidence and mortality of bladder cancer. We searched PubMed up to December 2013 for relevant prospective studies. We conducted highest compared with lowest meta‐analyses and dose–response meta‐analyses using random effects models to estimate summary relative risks (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content>s) and 95% confidence intervals (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>s), and used restricted cubic splines to examine possible nonlinear associations. Fifteen prospective studies were included in the review. The summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for an increase of 1 serving/day (80 g) were 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.95–0.99) <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies for fruits and vegetables, 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.94–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 10%, 10 studies) for vegetables and 0.98 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.96–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, 12 studies) for fruits. Results were similar in men and women and in current, former and nonsmokers. Amongst fruits and vegetables subgroups, for citrus fruits the summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for the highest compared with the lowest intake was 0.87 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.76–0.99, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies) and for cruciferous vegetables there was evidence of a nonlinear relationship (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.001). The current evidence from cohort studies is not consistent with a role for fruits and vegetables in preventing bladder cancer.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 136
container_title Cancer Medicine
container_volume 4
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792339897684590598
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:55:01.183Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Fruits%2C+vegetables%2C+and+bladder+cancer+risk%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.date=2015-01-01&genre=article&issn=2045-7634&volume=4&issue=1&spage=136&epage=146&pages=136-146&jtitle=Cancer+Medicine&atitle=Fruits%2C+vegetables%2C+and+bladder+cancer+risk%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta%E2%80%90analysis&aulast=Norat&aufirst=Teresa&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fcam4.327&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792339897684590598
author Vieira, Ana R., Vingeliene, Snieguole, Chan, Doris S. M., Aune, Dagfinn, Abar, Leila, Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah, Greenwood, Darren C., Norat, Teresa
author_facet Vieira, Ana R., Vingeliene, Snieguole, Chan, Doris S. M., Aune, Dagfinn, Abar, Leila, Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah, Greenwood, Darren C., Norat, Teresa, Vieira, Ana R., Vingeliene, Snieguole, Chan, Doris S. M., Aune, Dagfinn, Abar, Leila, Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah, Greenwood, Darren C., Norat, Teresa
author_sort vieira, ana r.
container_issue 1
container_start_page 136
container_title Cancer Medicine
container_volume 4
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Smoking is estimated to cause about half of all bladder cancer cases. Case–control studies have provided evidence of an inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and bladder cancer risk. As part of the World Cancer Research/American Institute for Cancer Research Continuous Update Project, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective studies to assess the dose–response relationship between fruit and vegetables and incidence and mortality of bladder cancer. We searched PubMed up to December 2013 for relevant prospective studies. We conducted highest compared with lowest meta‐analyses and dose–response meta‐analyses using random effects models to estimate summary relative risks (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content>s) and 95% confidence intervals (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>s), and used restricted cubic splines to examine possible nonlinear associations. Fifteen prospective studies were included in the review. The summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for an increase of 1 serving/day (80 g) were 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.95–0.99) <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies for fruits and vegetables, 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.94–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 10%, 10 studies) for vegetables and 0.98 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.96–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, 12 studies) for fruits. Results were similar in men and women and in current, former and nonsmokers. Amongst fruits and vegetables subgroups, for citrus fruits the summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for the highest compared with the lowest intake was 0.87 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.76–0.99, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies) and for cruciferous vegetables there was evidence of a nonlinear relationship (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.001). The current evidence from cohort studies is not consistent with a role for fruits and vegetables in preventing bladder cancer.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cam4.327
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jYW00LjMyNw
imprint Wiley, 2015
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2015
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 2045-7634
issn_str_mv 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:55:01.183Z
match_str vieira2015fruitsvegetablesandbladdercancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 136-146
publishDate 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Cancer Medicine
source_id 49
spelling Vieira, Ana R. Vingeliene, Snieguole Chan, Doris S. M. Aune, Dagfinn Abar, Leila Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah Greenwood, Darren C. Norat, Teresa 2045-7634 2045-7634 Wiley Cancer Research Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.327 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Smoking is estimated to cause about half of all bladder cancer cases. Case–control studies have provided evidence of an inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and bladder cancer risk. As part of the World Cancer Research/American Institute for Cancer Research Continuous Update Project, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective studies to assess the dose–response relationship between fruit and vegetables and incidence and mortality of bladder cancer. We searched PubMed up to December 2013 for relevant prospective studies. We conducted highest compared with lowest meta‐analyses and dose–response meta‐analyses using random effects models to estimate summary relative risks (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content>s) and 95% confidence intervals (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>s), and used restricted cubic splines to examine possible nonlinear associations. Fifteen prospective studies were included in the review. The summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for an increase of 1 serving/day (80 g) were 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.95–0.99) <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies for fruits and vegetables, 0.97 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.94–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 10%, 10 studies) for vegetables and 0.98 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.96–1.00, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, 12 studies) for fruits. Results were similar in men and women and in current, former and nonsmokers. Amongst fruits and vegetables subgroups, for citrus fruits the summary <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">RR</jats:styled-content> for the highest compared with the lowest intake was 0.87 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.76–0.99, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%, eight studies) and for cruciferous vegetables there was evidence of a nonlinear relationship (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.001). The current evidence from cohort studies is not consistent with a role for fruits and vegetables in preventing bladder cancer.</jats:p> Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Cancer Medicine
spellingShingle Vieira, Ana R., Vingeliene, Snieguole, Chan, Doris S. M., Aune, Dagfinn, Abar, Leila, Navarro Rosenblatt, Deborah, Greenwood, Darren C., Norat, Teresa, Cancer Medicine, Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Oncology
title Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_unstemmed Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.327