author_facet Alexander, Jonathan R.
Spackman, Jared A.
Wilson, Melissa L.
Fernández, Fabián G.
Venterea, Rodney T.
Alexander, Jonathan R.
Spackman, Jared A.
Wilson, Melissa L.
Fernández, Fabián G.
Venterea, Rodney T.
author Alexander, Jonathan R.
Spackman, Jared A.
Wilson, Melissa L.
Fernández, Fabián G.
Venterea, Rodney T.
spellingShingle Alexander, Jonathan R.
Spackman, Jared A.
Wilson, Melissa L.
Fernández, Fabián G.
Venterea, Rodney T.
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
Plant Science
Soil Science
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
author_sort alexander, jonathan r.
spelling Alexander, Jonathan R. Spackman, Jared A. Wilson, Melissa L. Fernández, Fabián G. Venterea, Rodney T. 2639-6696 2639-6696 Wiley Plant Science Soil Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20199 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ammonia (NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>) emissions are an economically and environmentally significant loss pathway of fertilizer and soil‐derived N. Chambers are a commonly used method to quantify NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions in plot‐scale agricultural research. Although this method is widely used, its accuracy may be influenced by the overall design of the chamber, its components, and its interaction with the environment. Four NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> chamber designs, including open, open + polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), semi‐open, and closed, were deployed over a dilute NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> solution for 6 h on four dates to determine the effect of chamber design on NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency. The solution volume and concentration were measured before and after acid trap deployment, and total volatile NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emission was assumed to be equal to the mass N loss. The NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency relative to the estimated total emissions was greatest for the open design (12.9%), whereas the semi‐open chamber was the least efficient (3.5%). The closed chamber reduced NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions relative to the open and semi‐open designs by inhibiting convective gas transport beneath the chamber footprint.</jats:p> Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
doi_str_mv 10.1002/agg2.20199
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hZ2cyLjIwMTk5
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hZ2cyLjIwMTk5
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2021
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2021
issn 2639-6696
issn_str_mv 2639-6696
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str alexander2021captureefficiencyoffourchamberdesignsformeasuringammoniaemissions
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
source_id 49
title Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_unstemmed Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_full Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_fullStr Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_full_unstemmed Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_short Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_sort capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
topic Plant Science
Soil Science
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20199
publishDate 2021
physical
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ammonia (NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>) emissions are an economically and environmentally significant loss pathway of fertilizer and soil‐derived N. Chambers are a commonly used method to quantify NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions in plot‐scale agricultural research. Although this method is widely used, its accuracy may be influenced by the overall design of the chamber, its components, and its interaction with the environment. Four NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> chamber designs, including open, open + polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), semi‐open, and closed, were deployed over a dilute NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> solution for 6 h on four dates to determine the effect of chamber design on NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency. The solution volume and concentration were measured before and after acid trap deployment, and total volatile NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emission was assumed to be equal to the mass N loss. The NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency relative to the estimated total emissions was greatest for the open design (12.9%), whereas the semi‐open chamber was the least efficient (3.5%). The closed chamber reduced NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions relative to the open and semi‐open designs by inhibiting convective gas transport beneath the chamber footprint.</jats:p>
container_issue 3
container_start_page 0
container_title Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
container_volume 4
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792338769993531397
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:37:29.751Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Capture+efficiency+of+four+chamber+designs+for+measuring+ammonia+emissions&rft.date=2021-01-01&genre=article&issn=2639-6696&volume=4&issue=3&jtitle=Agrosystems%2C+Geosciences+%26+Environment&atitle=Capture+efficiency+of+four+chamber+designs+for+measuring+ammonia+emissions&aulast=Venterea&aufirst=Rodney+T.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fagg2.20199&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792338769993531397
author Alexander, Jonathan R., Spackman, Jared A., Wilson, Melissa L., Fernández, Fabián G., Venterea, Rodney T.
author_facet Alexander, Jonathan R., Spackman, Jared A., Wilson, Melissa L., Fernández, Fabián G., Venterea, Rodney T., Alexander, Jonathan R., Spackman, Jared A., Wilson, Melissa L., Fernández, Fabián G., Venterea, Rodney T.
author_sort alexander, jonathan r.
container_issue 3
container_start_page 0
container_title Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
container_volume 4
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ammonia (NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>) emissions are an economically and environmentally significant loss pathway of fertilizer and soil‐derived N. Chambers are a commonly used method to quantify NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions in plot‐scale agricultural research. Although this method is widely used, its accuracy may be influenced by the overall design of the chamber, its components, and its interaction with the environment. Four NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> chamber designs, including open, open + polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), semi‐open, and closed, were deployed over a dilute NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> solution for 6 h on four dates to determine the effect of chamber design on NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency. The solution volume and concentration were measured before and after acid trap deployment, and total volatile NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emission was assumed to be equal to the mass N loss. The NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency relative to the estimated total emissions was greatest for the open design (12.9%), whereas the semi‐open chamber was the least efficient (3.5%). The closed chamber reduced NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions relative to the open and semi‐open designs by inhibiting convective gas transport beneath the chamber footprint.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/agg2.20199
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hZ2cyLjIwMTk5
imprint Wiley, 2021
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2021
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2639-6696
issn_str_mv 2639-6696
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:37:29.751Z
match_str alexander2021captureefficiencyoffourchamberdesignsformeasuringammoniaemissions
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
source_id 49
spelling Alexander, Jonathan R. Spackman, Jared A. Wilson, Melissa L. Fernández, Fabián G. Venterea, Rodney T. 2639-6696 2639-6696 Wiley Plant Science Soil Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20199 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ammonia (NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>) emissions are an economically and environmentally significant loss pathway of fertilizer and soil‐derived N. Chambers are a commonly used method to quantify NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions in plot‐scale agricultural research. Although this method is widely used, its accuracy may be influenced by the overall design of the chamber, its components, and its interaction with the environment. Four NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> chamber designs, including open, open + polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), semi‐open, and closed, were deployed over a dilute NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> solution for 6 h on four dates to determine the effect of chamber design on NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency. The solution volume and concentration were measured before and after acid trap deployment, and total volatile NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emission was assumed to be equal to the mass N loss. The NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> capture efficiency relative to the estimated total emissions was greatest for the open design (12.9%), whereas the semi‐open chamber was the least efficient (3.5%). The closed chamber reduced NH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> emissions relative to the open and semi‐open designs by inhibiting convective gas transport beneath the chamber footprint.</jats:p> Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
spellingShingle Alexander, Jonathan R., Spackman, Jared A., Wilson, Melissa L., Fernández, Fabián G., Venterea, Rodney T., Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions, Plant Science, Soil Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
title Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_full Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_fullStr Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_full_unstemmed Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_short Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_sort capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
title_unstemmed Capture efficiency of four chamber designs for measuring ammonia emissions
topic Plant Science, Soil Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20199