author_facet Coburn, Jessica
Wells, M. Scott
Sheaffer, Craig C.
Ruan, Roger
Samac, Deborah A.
Coburn, Jessica
Wells, M. Scott
Sheaffer, Craig C.
Ruan, Roger
Samac, Deborah A.
author Coburn, Jessica
Wells, M. Scott
Sheaffer, Craig C.
Ruan, Roger
Samac, Deborah A.
spellingShingle Coburn, Jessica
Wells, M. Scott
Sheaffer, Craig C.
Ruan, Roger
Samac, Deborah A.
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
Plant Science
Soil Science
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
author_sort coburn, jessica
spelling Coburn, Jessica Wells, M. Scott Sheaffer, Craig C. Ruan, Roger Samac, Deborah A. 2639-6696 2639-6696 Wiley Plant Science Soil Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20184 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Alternative plant‐based protein sources are needed for supplementing or replacing fishmeal in formulated animal feeds. Alfalfa (<jats:italic>Medicago sativa</jats:italic> L.), a perennial legume, is grown worldwide as a high‐protein forage crop used primarily for dairy and beef cattle feeds. However, its utility as a protein source for feeding other farmed animals has great potential. Wet fractionation can provide several products that increase the value of the crop. The amount of alfalfa protein concentrate (APC) recovered from a fresh press filtrate was measured from several feedstocks: herbage of a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa, genetically modified reduced‐lignin alfalfa, and conventional alfalfa as well as from leaves of the biomass type fractionated at harvest. Additionally, five methods for APC recovery were compared. Approximately 854 kg of APC, 7,109 kg of press residue suitable as low quality animal feed, and 4.5 Tg of dry hay could be produced annually from a hectare of biomass‐type alfalfa. The amounts of APC recovered from a reduced‐lignin alfalfa and a conventional cultivar were similar. Acid‐based precipitation methods resulted in the largest recovery of APC, whereas heating produced the highest concentration of protein in the concentrate and highest concentration of methionine, lysine, and threonine. The percentage of fatty acids and sugars in the concentrate varied significantly by precipitation method. All methods resulted in low amounts of fiber in the concentrate. Our results indicate that a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa can produce high yields of APC and co‐products with fewer harvests than a conventional cultivar, which reduces costs and promotes crop productivity.</jats:p> Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
doi_str_mv 10.1002/agg2.20184
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hZ2cyLjIwMTg0
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hZ2cyLjIwMTg0
institution DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2021
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2021
issn 2639-6696
issn_str_mv 2639-6696
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str coburn2021comparisonofplantfeedstocksandmethodstorecoverleafproteinsfromwetfractionationofalfalfaforpotentialuseinaquaculturepoultryandlivestockfeeds
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
source_id 49
title Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_unstemmed Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_full Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_fullStr Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_short Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_sort comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
topic Plant Science
Soil Science
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20184
publishDate 2021
physical
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Alternative plant‐based protein sources are needed for supplementing or replacing fishmeal in formulated animal feeds. Alfalfa (<jats:italic>Medicago sativa</jats:italic> L.), a perennial legume, is grown worldwide as a high‐protein forage crop used primarily for dairy and beef cattle feeds. However, its utility as a protein source for feeding other farmed animals has great potential. Wet fractionation can provide several products that increase the value of the crop. The amount of alfalfa protein concentrate (APC) recovered from a fresh press filtrate was measured from several feedstocks: herbage of a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa, genetically modified reduced‐lignin alfalfa, and conventional alfalfa as well as from leaves of the biomass type fractionated at harvest. Additionally, five methods for APC recovery were compared. Approximately 854 kg of APC, 7,109 kg of press residue suitable as low quality animal feed, and 4.5 Tg of dry hay could be produced annually from a hectare of biomass‐type alfalfa. The amounts of APC recovered from a reduced‐lignin alfalfa and a conventional cultivar were similar. Acid‐based precipitation methods resulted in the largest recovery of APC, whereas heating produced the highest concentration of protein in the concentrate and highest concentration of methionine, lysine, and threonine. The percentage of fatty acids and sugars in the concentrate varied significantly by precipitation method. All methods resulted in low amounts of fiber in the concentrate. Our results indicate that a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa can produce high yields of APC and co‐products with fewer harvests than a conventional cultivar, which reduces costs and promotes crop productivity.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 0
container_title Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
container_volume 4
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343846763364363
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:58:08.14Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Comparison+of+plant+feedstocks+and+methods+to+recover+leaf+proteins+from+wet+fractionation+of+alfalfa+for+potential+use+in+aquaculture%2C+poultry%2C+and+livestock+feeds&rft.date=2021-01-01&genre=article&issn=2639-6696&volume=4&issue=2&jtitle=Agrosystems%2C+Geosciences+%26+Environment&atitle=Comparison+of+plant+feedstocks+and+methods+to+recover+leaf+proteins+from+wet+fractionation+of+alfalfa+for+potential+use+in+aquaculture%2C+poultry%2C+and+livestock+feeds&aulast=Samac&aufirst=Deborah+A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fagg2.20184&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343846763364363
author Coburn, Jessica, Wells, M. Scott, Sheaffer, Craig C., Ruan, Roger, Samac, Deborah A.
author_facet Coburn, Jessica, Wells, M. Scott, Sheaffer, Craig C., Ruan, Roger, Samac, Deborah A., Coburn, Jessica, Wells, M. Scott, Sheaffer, Craig C., Ruan, Roger, Samac, Deborah A.
author_sort coburn, jessica
container_issue 2
container_start_page 0
container_title Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
container_volume 4
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Alternative plant‐based protein sources are needed for supplementing or replacing fishmeal in formulated animal feeds. Alfalfa (<jats:italic>Medicago sativa</jats:italic> L.), a perennial legume, is grown worldwide as a high‐protein forage crop used primarily for dairy and beef cattle feeds. However, its utility as a protein source for feeding other farmed animals has great potential. Wet fractionation can provide several products that increase the value of the crop. The amount of alfalfa protein concentrate (APC) recovered from a fresh press filtrate was measured from several feedstocks: herbage of a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa, genetically modified reduced‐lignin alfalfa, and conventional alfalfa as well as from leaves of the biomass type fractionated at harvest. Additionally, five methods for APC recovery were compared. Approximately 854 kg of APC, 7,109 kg of press residue suitable as low quality animal feed, and 4.5 Tg of dry hay could be produced annually from a hectare of biomass‐type alfalfa. The amounts of APC recovered from a reduced‐lignin alfalfa and a conventional cultivar were similar. Acid‐based precipitation methods resulted in the largest recovery of APC, whereas heating produced the highest concentration of protein in the concentrate and highest concentration of methionine, lysine, and threonine. The percentage of fatty acids and sugars in the concentrate varied significantly by precipitation method. All methods resulted in low amounts of fiber in the concentrate. Our results indicate that a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa can produce high yields of APC and co‐products with fewer harvests than a conventional cultivar, which reduces costs and promotes crop productivity.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/agg2.20184
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hZ2cyLjIwMTg0
imprint Wiley, 2021
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2021
institution DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2639-6696
issn_str_mv 2639-6696
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:58:08.14Z
match_str coburn2021comparisonofplantfeedstocksandmethodstorecoverleafproteinsfromwetfractionationofalfalfaforpotentialuseinaquaculturepoultryandlivestockfeeds
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
source_id 49
spelling Coburn, Jessica Wells, M. Scott Sheaffer, Craig C. Ruan, Roger Samac, Deborah A. 2639-6696 2639-6696 Wiley Plant Science Soil Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20184 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Alternative plant‐based protein sources are needed for supplementing or replacing fishmeal in formulated animal feeds. Alfalfa (<jats:italic>Medicago sativa</jats:italic> L.), a perennial legume, is grown worldwide as a high‐protein forage crop used primarily for dairy and beef cattle feeds. However, its utility as a protein source for feeding other farmed animals has great potential. Wet fractionation can provide several products that increase the value of the crop. The amount of alfalfa protein concentrate (APC) recovered from a fresh press filtrate was measured from several feedstocks: herbage of a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa, genetically modified reduced‐lignin alfalfa, and conventional alfalfa as well as from leaves of the biomass type fractionated at harvest. Additionally, five methods for APC recovery were compared. Approximately 854 kg of APC, 7,109 kg of press residue suitable as low quality animal feed, and 4.5 Tg of dry hay could be produced annually from a hectare of biomass‐type alfalfa. The amounts of APC recovered from a reduced‐lignin alfalfa and a conventional cultivar were similar. Acid‐based precipitation methods resulted in the largest recovery of APC, whereas heating produced the highest concentration of protein in the concentrate and highest concentration of methionine, lysine, and threonine. The percentage of fatty acids and sugars in the concentrate varied significantly by precipitation method. All methods resulted in low amounts of fiber in the concentrate. Our results indicate that a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa can produce high yields of APC and co‐products with fewer harvests than a conventional cultivar, which reduces costs and promotes crop productivity.</jats:p> Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
spellingShingle Coburn, Jessica, Wells, M. Scott, Sheaffer, Craig C., Ruan, Roger, Samac, Deborah A., Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds, Plant Science, Soil Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
title Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_full Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_fullStr Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_short Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_sort comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_unstemmed Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
topic Plant Science, Soil Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20184