author_facet Vieillevigne, Laure
Khamphan, Catherine
Saez, Jordi
Hernandez, Victor
Vieillevigne, Laure
Khamphan, Catherine
Saez, Jordi
Hernandez, Victor
author Vieillevigne, Laure
Khamphan, Catherine
Saez, Jordi
Hernandez, Victor
spellingShingle Vieillevigne, Laure
Khamphan, Catherine
Saez, Jordi
Hernandez, Victor
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Instrumentation
Radiation
author_sort vieillevigne, laure
spelling Vieillevigne, Laure Khamphan, Catherine Saez, Jordi Hernandez, Victor 1526-9914 1526-9914 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&amp;G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&amp;G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&amp;G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub>) and an optimal DLG (DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> and DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). By using DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) <jats:italic>&gt;</jats:italic> 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&amp;G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&amp;G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value.</jats:p> On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.12656
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Allgemeines
Technik
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNjU2
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNjU2
institution DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
issn 1526-9914
issn_str_mv 1526-9914
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str vieillevigne2019ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
source_id 49
title On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_unstemmed On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_fullStr On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_short On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_sort on the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the eclipse treatment planning system
topic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Instrumentation
Radiation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656
publishDate 2019
physical 68-77
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&amp;G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&amp;G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&amp;G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub>) and an optimal DLG (DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> and DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). By using DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) <jats:italic>&gt;</jats:italic> 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&amp;G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&amp;G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value.</jats:p>
container_issue 7
container_start_page 68
container_title Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
container_volume 20
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792340849947836423
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:09:43.608Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=On+the+need+for+tuning+the+dosimetric+leaf+gap+for+stereotactic+treatment+plans+in+the+Eclipse+treatment+planning+system&rft.date=2019-07-01&genre=article&issn=1526-9914&volume=20&issue=7&spage=68&epage=77&pages=68-77&jtitle=Journal+of+Applied+Clinical+Medical+Physics&atitle=On+the+need+for+tuning+the+dosimetric+leaf+gap+for+stereotactic+treatment+plans+in+the+Eclipse+treatment+planning+system&aulast=Hernandez&aufirst=Victor&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Facm2.12656&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792340849947836423
author Vieillevigne, Laure, Khamphan, Catherine, Saez, Jordi, Hernandez, Victor
author_facet Vieillevigne, Laure, Khamphan, Catherine, Saez, Jordi, Hernandez, Victor, Vieillevigne, Laure, Khamphan, Catherine, Saez, Jordi, Hernandez, Victor
author_sort vieillevigne, laure
container_issue 7
container_start_page 68
container_title Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
container_volume 20
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&amp;G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&amp;G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&amp;G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub>) and an optimal DLG (DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> and DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). By using DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) <jats:italic>&gt;</jats:italic> 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&amp;G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&amp;G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.12656
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Allgemeines, Technik, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNjU2
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
institution DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3
issn 1526-9914
issn_str_mv 1526-9914
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:09:43.608Z
match_str vieillevigne2019ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 68-77
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
source_id 49
spelling Vieillevigne, Laure Khamphan, Catherine Saez, Jordi Hernandez, Victor 1526-9914 1526-9914 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&amp;G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&amp;G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&amp;G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub>) and an optimal DLG (DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> and DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). By using DLG<jats:sub>meas</jats:sub> in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) <jats:italic>&gt;</jats:italic> 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&amp;G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&amp;G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value.</jats:p> On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
spellingShingle Vieillevigne, Laure, Khamphan, Catherine, Saez, Jordi, Hernandez, Victor, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, Radiation
title On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_fullStr On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_short On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_sort on the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the eclipse treatment planning system
title_unstemmed On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
topic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, Radiation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656