Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , |
In: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 20, 2019, 1, S. 229-236 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo |
---|---|
author |
Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo |
spellingShingle |
Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation |
author_sort |
motegi, kana |
spelling |
Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo 1526-9914 1526-9914 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p> Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
doi_str_mv |
10.1002/acm2.12515 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Allgemeines Technik Physik |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNTE1 |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNTE1 |
institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
imprint |
Wiley, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2019 |
issn |
1526-9914 |
issn_str_mv |
1526-9914 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
match_str |
motegi2019usefulnessofhybriddeformableimageregistrationalgorithmsinprostateradiationtherapy |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publisher |
Wiley |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_unstemmed |
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_full |
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_fullStr |
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_short |
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_sort |
usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
topic |
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515 |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
229-236 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
229 |
container_title |
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
container_volume |
20 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792347828925759489 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T18:01:00.677Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Usefulness+of+hybrid+deformable+image+registration+algorithms+in+prostate+radiation+therapy&rft.date=2019-01-01&genre=article&issn=1526-9914&volume=20&issue=1&spage=229&epage=236&pages=229-236&jtitle=Journal+of+Applied+Clinical+Medical+Physics&atitle=Usefulness+of+hybrid+deformable+image+registration+algorithms+in+prostate+radiation+therapy&aulast=Akimoto&aufirst=Tetsuo&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Facm2.12515&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792347828925759489 |
author | Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo |
author_facet | Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo, Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo |
author_sort | motegi, kana |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
container_volume | 20 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.12515 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Allgemeines, Technik, Physik |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNTE1 |
imprint | Wiley, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2019 |
institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
issn | 1526-9914 |
issn_str_mv | 1526-9914 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T18:01:00.677Z |
match_str | motegi2019usefulnessofhybriddeformableimageregistrationalgorithmsinprostateradiationtherapy |
mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
physical | 229-236 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo 1526-9914 1526-9914 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p> Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
spellingShingle | Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, Radiation |
title | Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_full | Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_short | Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_sort | usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
title_unstemmed | Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy |
topic | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, Radiation |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515 |