author_facet Motegi, Kana
Tachibana, Hidenobu
Motegi, Atsushi
Hotta, Kenji
Baba, Hiromi
Akimoto, Tetsuo
Motegi, Kana
Tachibana, Hidenobu
Motegi, Atsushi
Hotta, Kenji
Baba, Hiromi
Akimoto, Tetsuo
author Motegi, Kana
Tachibana, Hidenobu
Motegi, Atsushi
Hotta, Kenji
Baba, Hiromi
Akimoto, Tetsuo
spellingShingle Motegi, Kana
Tachibana, Hidenobu
Motegi, Atsushi
Hotta, Kenji
Baba, Hiromi
Akimoto, Tetsuo
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Instrumentation
Radiation
author_sort motegi, kana
spelling Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo 1526-9914 1526-9914 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p> Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.12515
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Allgemeines
Technik
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNTE1
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNTE1
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
issn 1526-9914
issn_str_mv 1526-9914
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str motegi2019usefulnessofhybriddeformableimageregistrationalgorithmsinprostateradiationtherapy
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
source_id 49
title Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_unstemmed Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_full Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_fullStr Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_short Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_sort usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
topic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Instrumentation
Radiation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515
publishDate 2019
physical 229-236
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 229
container_title Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
container_volume 20
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792347828925759489
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:01:00.677Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Usefulness+of+hybrid+deformable+image+registration+algorithms+in+prostate+radiation+therapy&rft.date=2019-01-01&genre=article&issn=1526-9914&volume=20&issue=1&spage=229&epage=236&pages=229-236&jtitle=Journal+of+Applied+Clinical+Medical+Physics&atitle=Usefulness+of+hybrid+deformable+image+registration+algorithms+in+prostate+radiation+therapy&aulast=Akimoto&aufirst=Tetsuo&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Facm2.12515&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792347828925759489
author Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo
author_facet Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo, Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo
author_sort motegi, kana
container_issue 1
container_start_page 229
container_title Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
container_volume 20
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.12515
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Allgemeines, Technik, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hY20yLjEyNTE1
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1526-9914
issn_str_mv 1526-9914
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:01:00.677Z
match_str motegi2019usefulnessofhybriddeformableimageregistrationalgorithmsinprostateradiationtherapy
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 229-236
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
source_id 49
spelling Motegi, Kana Tachibana, Hidenobu Motegi, Atsushi Hotta, Kenji Baba, Hiromi Akimoto, Tetsuo 1526-9914 1526-9914 Wiley Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging Instrumentation Radiation http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of commercially available hybrid deformable image registration (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content>) algorithms when using planning <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>) and daily cone‐beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT</jats:styled-content>) in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms in RayStation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> Maestro were evaluated. Contours of the prostate, bladder, rectum, and seminal vesicles (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s) were used as region‐of‐interest (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s) to guide image deformation in the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> and to compare the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy. To evaluate robustness of the hybrid <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> for prostate cancer patients with organs with volume that vary on a daily basis, such as the bladder and rectum, the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> algorithms were performed on ten pairs of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CT</jats:styled-content> volumes from ten patients who underwent prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. In a visual evaluation, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MIM</jats:styled-content> caused unrealistic image deformation in soft tissues, organs, and pelvic bones. The mean dice similarity coefficient (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>) ranged from 0.46 to 0.90 for the prostate, bladder, rectum, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s; the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s had the lowest <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content>. Target registration error (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content>) at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s was about 2 mm for the prostate and bladder, and about 6 mm for the rectum and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SV</jats:styled-content>s. RayStation did not cause unrealistic image deformation, and could maintain the shape of pelvic bones in most cases. The mean <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DSC</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">TRE</jats:styled-content> at the centroid of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s were about 0.9 and within 5 mm generally. In both software programs, the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide image deformation had the possibility to reduce any unrealistic image deformation and might be effective to keep the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> physically reasonable. The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pCT</jats:styled-content>/<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CBCT DIR</jats:styled-content> for the prostate cancer did not reduce the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">DIR</jats:styled-content> accuracy because of the use of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">ROI</jats:styled-content>s to guide the image deformation.</jats:p> Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
spellingShingle Motegi, Kana, Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Atsushi, Hotta, Kenji, Baba, Hiromi, Akimoto, Tetsuo, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, Radiation
title Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_full Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_fullStr Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_short Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_sort usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
title_unstemmed Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy
topic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, Radiation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12515