Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Seismic Hazard and Public Safety
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 94, 2013, 27, S. 240-241 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Marzocchi, Warner Marzocchi, Warner |
|---|---|
| author |
Marzocchi, Warner |
| spellingShingle |
Marzocchi, Warner Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union Seismic Hazard and Public Safety General Earth and Planetary Sciences |
| author_sort |
marzocchi, warner |
| spelling |
Marzocchi, Warner 0096-3941 2324-9250 American Geophysical Union (AGU) General Earth and Planetary Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013eo270005 <jats:p>The recent destructive earthquakes in Wenchuan (China), L'Aquila (Italy), Port‐au‐Prince (Haiti), Christchurch (New Zealand), and Tohoku (Japan) have reignited the discussion over seismic safety. Several scientists [e.g., <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Wyss et al</jats:italic>., 2012] have questioned the reliability of some seismic hazard maps based on the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA)—a widely used probabilistic approach that estimates the likelihood of various levels of ground shaking occurring at a given location in a given future time period—raising an intense discussion on this specific point [<jats:italic>Hanks et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Frankel</jats:italic>, 2013; <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2013].</jats:p> Seismic Hazard and Public Safety Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/2013eo270005 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDEzZW8yNzAwMDU |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDEzZW8yNzAwMDU |
| institution |
DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Zwi2 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 |
| imprint |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2013 |
| issn |
0096-3941 2324-9250 |
| issn_str_mv |
0096-3941 2324-9250 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
marzocchi2013seismichazardandpublicsafety |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_unstemmed |
Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_full |
Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_fullStr |
Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_short |
Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_sort |
seismic hazard and public safety |
| topic |
General Earth and Planetary Sciences |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013eo270005 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| physical |
240-241 |
| description |
<jats:p>The recent destructive earthquakes in Wenchuan (China), L'Aquila (Italy), Port‐au‐Prince (Haiti), Christchurch (New Zealand), and Tohoku (Japan) have reignited the discussion over seismic safety. Several scientists [e.g., <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Wyss et al</jats:italic>., 2012] have questioned the reliability of some seismic hazard maps based on the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA)—a widely used probabilistic approach that estimates the likelihood of various levels of ground shaking occurring at a given location in a given future time period—raising an intense discussion on this specific point [<jats:italic>Hanks et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Frankel</jats:italic>, 2013; <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2013].</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
27 |
| container_start_page |
240 |
| container_title |
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
| container_volume |
94 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792339707142602763 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:51:57.033Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Seismic+Hazard+and+Public+Safety&rft.date=2013-07-02&genre=article&issn=2324-9250&volume=94&issue=27&spage=240&epage=241&pages=240-241&jtitle=Eos%2C+Transactions+American+Geophysical+Union&atitle=Seismic+Hazard+and+Public+Safety&aulast=Marzocchi&aufirst=Warner&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2F2013eo270005&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792339707142602763 |
| author | Marzocchi, Warner |
| author_facet | Marzocchi, Warner, Marzocchi, Warner |
| author_sort | marzocchi, warner |
| container_issue | 27 |
| container_start_page | 240 |
| container_title | Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
| container_volume | 94 |
| description | <jats:p>The recent destructive earthquakes in Wenchuan (China), L'Aquila (Italy), Port‐au‐Prince (Haiti), Christchurch (New Zealand), and Tohoku (Japan) have reignited the discussion over seismic safety. Several scientists [e.g., <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Wyss et al</jats:italic>., 2012] have questioned the reliability of some seismic hazard maps based on the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA)—a widely used probabilistic approach that estimates the likelihood of various levels of ground shaking occurring at a given location in a given future time period—raising an intense discussion on this specific point [<jats:italic>Hanks et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Frankel</jats:italic>, 2013; <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2013].</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2013eo270005 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDEzZW8yNzAwMDU |
| imprint | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2013 |
| institution | DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14 |
| issn | 0096-3941, 2324-9250 |
| issn_str_mv | 0096-3941, 2324-9250 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:51:57.033Z |
| match_str | marzocchi2013seismichazardandpublicsafety |
| mega_collection | American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 240-241 |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Marzocchi, Warner 0096-3941 2324-9250 American Geophysical Union (AGU) General Earth and Planetary Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013eo270005 <jats:p>The recent destructive earthquakes in Wenchuan (China), L'Aquila (Italy), Port‐au‐Prince (Haiti), Christchurch (New Zealand), and Tohoku (Japan) have reignited the discussion over seismic safety. Several scientists [e.g., <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Wyss et al</jats:italic>., 2012] have questioned the reliability of some seismic hazard maps based on the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA)—a widely used probabilistic approach that estimates the likelihood of various levels of ground shaking occurring at a given location in a given future time period—raising an intense discussion on this specific point [<jats:italic>Hanks et al</jats:italic>., 2012; <jats:italic>Frankel</jats:italic>, 2013; <jats:italic>Stein et al</jats:italic>., 2013].</jats:p> Seismic Hazard and Public Safety Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
| spellingShingle | Marzocchi, Warner, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Seismic Hazard and Public Safety, General Earth and Planetary Sciences |
| title | Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_full | Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_fullStr | Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_full_unstemmed | Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_short | Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| title_sort | seismic hazard and public safety |
| title_unstemmed | Seismic Hazard and Public Safety |
| topic | General Earth and Planetary Sciences |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013eo270005 |