author_facet Terragna, C.
Solli, V.
Poletti, A.
Martello, M.
Borsi, E.
Pantani, L.
Zamagni, E.
Termini, R.
Agboyi, E. Lakpo
Mancuso, K.
Cifarelli, L.
Rocchi, S.
Rizzello, I.
Tacchetti, P.
Martinelli, G.
Cavo, M.
Terragna, C.
Solli, V.
Poletti, A.
Martello, M.
Borsi, E.
Pantani, L.
Zamagni, E.
Termini, R.
Agboyi, E. Lakpo
Mancuso, K.
Cifarelli, L.
Rocchi, S.
Rizzello, I.
Tacchetti, P.
Martinelli, G.
Cavo, M.
author Terragna, C.
Solli, V.
Poletti, A.
Martello, M.
Borsi, E.
Pantani, L.
Zamagni, E.
Termini, R.
Agboyi, E. Lakpo
Mancuso, K.
Cifarelli, L.
Rocchi, S.
Rizzello, I.
Tacchetti, P.
Martinelli, G.
Cavo, M.
spellingShingle Terragna, C.
Solli, V.
Poletti, A.
Martello, M.
Borsi, E.
Pantani, L.
Zamagni, E.
Termini, R.
Agboyi, E. Lakpo
Mancuso, K.
Cifarelli, L.
Rocchi, S.
Rizzello, I.
Tacchetti, P.
Martinelli, G.
Cavo, M.
HemaSphere
PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
Hematology
author_sort terragna, c.
spelling Terragna, C. Solli, V. Poletti, A. Martello, M. Borsi, E. Pantani, L. Zamagni, E. Termini, R. Agboyi, E. Lakpo Mancuso, K. Cifarelli, L. Rocchi, S. Rizzello, I. Tacchetti, P. Martinelli, G. Cavo, M. 2572-9241 2572-9241 Wiley Hematology http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000563664.54177.1a <jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p>Multiple Myeloma (MM) disease progression is often coupled to radical changes of the genomic sub‐clonal architecture, which in turn might impact the tumor‐specific aggressiveness and invasiveness over time. Therefore, MM patients (pts) are unlikely to maintain sustained MRD negativity status and the disease typically recurs. It is assumed that therapy bears a major role as selective driver to induce genomic changes within pts’ clonal architecture; nevertheless the identification of specific therapy‐driven genomic changes has been so far prevented by the scarce number of homogeneously‐treated cohorts of pts with paired samples (diagnosis and relapse).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims:</jats:title><jats:p>In the present study we estimated the role of maintenance therapy in eliciting genomic changes in a cohort of MM pts, up‐front treated with bortezomib‐based regimens.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Whole genome Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) landscape was obtained by analyzing SNPs array with dedicated R packages. The study included 43 pts, whose BM‐CD138+ cell fractions were collected both at diagnosis and at first relapse. 25 pts received maintenance therapy (19 lenalidomide, 6 proteasome inhibitor) and 18 did not. Median times to progression (TTP) were 30,5 (range 15–100) and 30 months (range 14–117) for pts who did or did not receive maintenance, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>We first aimed at defining pts evolution patterns. To this purpose, an analysis algorithm was first developed to assess the CNAs changes between diagnosis and relapse of any functional genomic region (i.e. coding genes and miRNA). Results were than bi‐clustered, by employing three linkage‐methods, hence revealing common subgroups of genes and pts showing similar behaviors, under the same therapeutic selective pressure: overall, 20 and 23 pts relapsed with branching and stable pattern, respectively.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts who received maintenance where more likely to relapse with changes in their genomic background (64% branched), as compared to pts who did not receive maintenance (39% were stable); nevertheless, any differences in overall survivals (OS) post first relapse were observed among pts with branching evolution pattern and pts whose genomic background remained stable between diagnosis and relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>We than focused on CN changes of specific genomic regions, whose prognostic role has been already established in MM, i.e. CN losses of <jats:italic>TP53</jats:italic> on chromosome (chr) 17p, <jats:italic>Rb1</jats:italic> on chr13q, <jats:italic>WWOX</jats:italic> on chr16p, <jats:italic>cdkn1c</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>FAM46C</jats:italic> on chr1p; CN gain of <jats:italic>CKS1B</jats:italic> on chr1q.</jats:p><jats:p>When present at diagnosis, these CNAs tended to persist throughout pts’ clinical follow up, regardless of whether pts received or not maintenance. The emersion of any of these CNAs at relapse was more likely in pts receiving maintenance (40% vs 17% of cases), even if maintenance seemed to favor a better disease control both in pts carrying durably any of these CNAs and in pts where any of them emerged at relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts with branching evolution pattern of any of the above mentioned CNAs particularly benefitted of maintenance therapy, with OS post first relapse significantly longer than pts who did not received maintenance therapy (50 vs 14 months, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Summary/Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>Genomic changes caused by the selective pressure of maintenance therapy and provoking the emersion of branched clones at relapse are likely to require time to take place. This might explain the extended survival observed in pts who received maintenance and relapsed with branching evolution patterns, as compared to that of pts whose genomic landscape tended to remain stable.</jats:p><jats:p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: AIRC (MC), Fondazione Berlucchi (CT)</jats:p></jats:sec> PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY HemaSphere
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.hs9.0000563664.54177.1a
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5Ny8wMS5oczkuMDAwMDU2MzY2NC41NDE3Ny4xYQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5Ny8wMS5oczkuMDAwMDU2MzY2NC41NDE3Ny4xYQ
institution DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
issn 2572-9241
issn_str_mv 2572-9241
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str terragna2019ps1346clonalevolutioninmultiplemyelomapatientsreceivingmaintenancetherapy
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series HemaSphere
source_id 49
title PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_unstemmed PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_full PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_fullStr PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_full_unstemmed PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_short PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_sort ps1346 clonal evolution in multiple myeloma patients receiving maintenance therapy
topic Hematology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000563664.54177.1a
publishDate 2019
physical 615
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p>Multiple Myeloma (MM) disease progression is often coupled to radical changes of the genomic sub‐clonal architecture, which in turn might impact the tumor‐specific aggressiveness and invasiveness over time. Therefore, MM patients (pts) are unlikely to maintain sustained MRD negativity status and the disease typically recurs. It is assumed that therapy bears a major role as selective driver to induce genomic changes within pts’ clonal architecture; nevertheless the identification of specific therapy‐driven genomic changes has been so far prevented by the scarce number of homogeneously‐treated cohorts of pts with paired samples (diagnosis and relapse).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims:</jats:title><jats:p>In the present study we estimated the role of maintenance therapy in eliciting genomic changes in a cohort of MM pts, up‐front treated with bortezomib‐based regimens.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Whole genome Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) landscape was obtained by analyzing SNPs array with dedicated R packages. The study included 43 pts, whose BM‐CD138+ cell fractions were collected both at diagnosis and at first relapse. 25 pts received maintenance therapy (19 lenalidomide, 6 proteasome inhibitor) and 18 did not. Median times to progression (TTP) were 30,5 (range 15–100) and 30 months (range 14–117) for pts who did or did not receive maintenance, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>We first aimed at defining pts evolution patterns. To this purpose, an analysis algorithm was first developed to assess the CNAs changes between diagnosis and relapse of any functional genomic region (i.e. coding genes and miRNA). Results were than bi‐clustered, by employing three linkage‐methods, hence revealing common subgroups of genes and pts showing similar behaviors, under the same therapeutic selective pressure: overall, 20 and 23 pts relapsed with branching and stable pattern, respectively.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts who received maintenance where more likely to relapse with changes in their genomic background (64% branched), as compared to pts who did not receive maintenance (39% were stable); nevertheless, any differences in overall survivals (OS) post first relapse were observed among pts with branching evolution pattern and pts whose genomic background remained stable between diagnosis and relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>We than focused on CN changes of specific genomic regions, whose prognostic role has been already established in MM, i.e. CN losses of <jats:italic>TP53</jats:italic> on chromosome (chr) 17p, <jats:italic>Rb1</jats:italic> on chr13q, <jats:italic>WWOX</jats:italic> on chr16p, <jats:italic>cdkn1c</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>FAM46C</jats:italic> on chr1p; CN gain of <jats:italic>CKS1B</jats:italic> on chr1q.</jats:p><jats:p>When present at diagnosis, these CNAs tended to persist throughout pts’ clinical follow up, regardless of whether pts received or not maintenance. The emersion of any of these CNAs at relapse was more likely in pts receiving maintenance (40% vs 17% of cases), even if maintenance seemed to favor a better disease control both in pts carrying durably any of these CNAs and in pts where any of them emerged at relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts with branching evolution pattern of any of the above mentioned CNAs particularly benefitted of maintenance therapy, with OS post first relapse significantly longer than pts who did not received maintenance therapy (50 vs 14 months, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Summary/Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>Genomic changes caused by the selective pressure of maintenance therapy and provoking the emersion of branched clones at relapse are likely to require time to take place. This might explain the extended survival observed in pts who received maintenance and relapsed with branching evolution patterns, as compared to that of pts whose genomic landscape tended to remain stable.</jats:p><jats:p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: AIRC (MC), Fondazione Berlucchi (CT)</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title HemaSphere
container_volume 3
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343637522120706
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:54:51.365Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=PS1346+CLONAL+EVOLUTION+IN+MULTIPLE+MYELOMA+PATIENTS+RECEIVING+MAINTENANCE+THERAPY&rft.date=2019-06-01&genre=article&issn=2572-9241&volume=3&issue=S1&pages=615&jtitle=HemaSphere&atitle=PS1346+CLONAL+EVOLUTION+IN+MULTIPLE+MYELOMA+PATIENTS+RECEIVING+MAINTENANCE+THERAPY&aulast=Cavo&aufirst=M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1097%2F01.hs9.0000563664.54177.1a&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343637522120706
author Terragna, C., Solli, V., Poletti, A., Martello, M., Borsi, E., Pantani, L., Zamagni, E., Termini, R., Agboyi, E. Lakpo, Mancuso, K., Cifarelli, L., Rocchi, S., Rizzello, I., Tacchetti, P., Martinelli, G., Cavo, M.
author_facet Terragna, C., Solli, V., Poletti, A., Martello, M., Borsi, E., Pantani, L., Zamagni, E., Termini, R., Agboyi, E. Lakpo, Mancuso, K., Cifarelli, L., Rocchi, S., Rizzello, I., Tacchetti, P., Martinelli, G., Cavo, M., Terragna, C., Solli, V., Poletti, A., Martello, M., Borsi, E., Pantani, L., Zamagni, E., Termini, R., Agboyi, E. Lakpo, Mancuso, K., Cifarelli, L., Rocchi, S., Rizzello, I., Tacchetti, P., Martinelli, G., Cavo, M.
author_sort terragna, c.
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title HemaSphere
container_volume 3
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p>Multiple Myeloma (MM) disease progression is often coupled to radical changes of the genomic sub‐clonal architecture, which in turn might impact the tumor‐specific aggressiveness and invasiveness over time. Therefore, MM patients (pts) are unlikely to maintain sustained MRD negativity status and the disease typically recurs. It is assumed that therapy bears a major role as selective driver to induce genomic changes within pts’ clonal architecture; nevertheless the identification of specific therapy‐driven genomic changes has been so far prevented by the scarce number of homogeneously‐treated cohorts of pts with paired samples (diagnosis and relapse).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims:</jats:title><jats:p>In the present study we estimated the role of maintenance therapy in eliciting genomic changes in a cohort of MM pts, up‐front treated with bortezomib‐based regimens.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Whole genome Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) landscape was obtained by analyzing SNPs array with dedicated R packages. The study included 43 pts, whose BM‐CD138+ cell fractions were collected both at diagnosis and at first relapse. 25 pts received maintenance therapy (19 lenalidomide, 6 proteasome inhibitor) and 18 did not. Median times to progression (TTP) were 30,5 (range 15–100) and 30 months (range 14–117) for pts who did or did not receive maintenance, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>We first aimed at defining pts evolution patterns. To this purpose, an analysis algorithm was first developed to assess the CNAs changes between diagnosis and relapse of any functional genomic region (i.e. coding genes and miRNA). Results were than bi‐clustered, by employing three linkage‐methods, hence revealing common subgroups of genes and pts showing similar behaviors, under the same therapeutic selective pressure: overall, 20 and 23 pts relapsed with branching and stable pattern, respectively.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts who received maintenance where more likely to relapse with changes in their genomic background (64% branched), as compared to pts who did not receive maintenance (39% were stable); nevertheless, any differences in overall survivals (OS) post first relapse were observed among pts with branching evolution pattern and pts whose genomic background remained stable between diagnosis and relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>We than focused on CN changes of specific genomic regions, whose prognostic role has been already established in MM, i.e. CN losses of <jats:italic>TP53</jats:italic> on chromosome (chr) 17p, <jats:italic>Rb1</jats:italic> on chr13q, <jats:italic>WWOX</jats:italic> on chr16p, <jats:italic>cdkn1c</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>FAM46C</jats:italic> on chr1p; CN gain of <jats:italic>CKS1B</jats:italic> on chr1q.</jats:p><jats:p>When present at diagnosis, these CNAs tended to persist throughout pts’ clinical follow up, regardless of whether pts received or not maintenance. The emersion of any of these CNAs at relapse was more likely in pts receiving maintenance (40% vs 17% of cases), even if maintenance seemed to favor a better disease control both in pts carrying durably any of these CNAs and in pts where any of them emerged at relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts with branching evolution pattern of any of the above mentioned CNAs particularly benefitted of maintenance therapy, with OS post first relapse significantly longer than pts who did not received maintenance therapy (50 vs 14 months, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Summary/Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>Genomic changes caused by the selective pressure of maintenance therapy and provoking the emersion of branched clones at relapse are likely to require time to take place. This might explain the extended survival observed in pts who received maintenance and relapsed with branching evolution patterns, as compared to that of pts whose genomic landscape tended to remain stable.</jats:p><jats:p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: AIRC (MC), Fondazione Berlucchi (CT)</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.hs9.0000563664.54177.1a
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5Ny8wMS5oczkuMDAwMDU2MzY2NC41NDE3Ny4xYQ
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
institution DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2572-9241
issn_str_mv 2572-9241
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:54:51.365Z
match_str terragna2019ps1346clonalevolutioninmultiplemyelomapatientsreceivingmaintenancetherapy
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 615
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series HemaSphere
source_id 49
spelling Terragna, C. Solli, V. Poletti, A. Martello, M. Borsi, E. Pantani, L. Zamagni, E. Termini, R. Agboyi, E. Lakpo Mancuso, K. Cifarelli, L. Rocchi, S. Rizzello, I. Tacchetti, P. Martinelli, G. Cavo, M. 2572-9241 2572-9241 Wiley Hematology http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000563664.54177.1a <jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p>Multiple Myeloma (MM) disease progression is often coupled to radical changes of the genomic sub‐clonal architecture, which in turn might impact the tumor‐specific aggressiveness and invasiveness over time. Therefore, MM patients (pts) are unlikely to maintain sustained MRD negativity status and the disease typically recurs. It is assumed that therapy bears a major role as selective driver to induce genomic changes within pts’ clonal architecture; nevertheless the identification of specific therapy‐driven genomic changes has been so far prevented by the scarce number of homogeneously‐treated cohorts of pts with paired samples (diagnosis and relapse).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims:</jats:title><jats:p>In the present study we estimated the role of maintenance therapy in eliciting genomic changes in a cohort of MM pts, up‐front treated with bortezomib‐based regimens.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Whole genome Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) landscape was obtained by analyzing SNPs array with dedicated R packages. The study included 43 pts, whose BM‐CD138+ cell fractions were collected both at diagnosis and at first relapse. 25 pts received maintenance therapy (19 lenalidomide, 6 proteasome inhibitor) and 18 did not. Median times to progression (TTP) were 30,5 (range 15–100) and 30 months (range 14–117) for pts who did or did not receive maintenance, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>We first aimed at defining pts evolution patterns. To this purpose, an analysis algorithm was first developed to assess the CNAs changes between diagnosis and relapse of any functional genomic region (i.e. coding genes and miRNA). Results were than bi‐clustered, by employing three linkage‐methods, hence revealing common subgroups of genes and pts showing similar behaviors, under the same therapeutic selective pressure: overall, 20 and 23 pts relapsed with branching and stable pattern, respectively.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts who received maintenance where more likely to relapse with changes in their genomic background (64% branched), as compared to pts who did not receive maintenance (39% were stable); nevertheless, any differences in overall survivals (OS) post first relapse were observed among pts with branching evolution pattern and pts whose genomic background remained stable between diagnosis and relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>We than focused on CN changes of specific genomic regions, whose prognostic role has been already established in MM, i.e. CN losses of <jats:italic>TP53</jats:italic> on chromosome (chr) 17p, <jats:italic>Rb1</jats:italic> on chr13q, <jats:italic>WWOX</jats:italic> on chr16p, <jats:italic>cdkn1c</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>FAM46C</jats:italic> on chr1p; CN gain of <jats:italic>CKS1B</jats:italic> on chr1q.</jats:p><jats:p>When present at diagnosis, these CNAs tended to persist throughout pts’ clinical follow up, regardless of whether pts received or not maintenance. The emersion of any of these CNAs at relapse was more likely in pts receiving maintenance (40% vs 17% of cases), even if maintenance seemed to favor a better disease control both in pts carrying durably any of these CNAs and in pts where any of them emerged at relapse.</jats:p><jats:p>Pts with branching evolution pattern of any of the above mentioned CNAs particularly benefitted of maintenance therapy, with OS post first relapse significantly longer than pts who did not received maintenance therapy (50 vs 14 months, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Summary/Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>Genomic changes caused by the selective pressure of maintenance therapy and provoking the emersion of branched clones at relapse are likely to require time to take place. This might explain the extended survival observed in pts who received maintenance and relapsed with branching evolution patterns, as compared to that of pts whose genomic landscape tended to remain stable.</jats:p><jats:p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: AIRC (MC), Fondazione Berlucchi (CT)</jats:p></jats:sec> PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY HemaSphere
spellingShingle Terragna, C., Solli, V., Poletti, A., Martello, M., Borsi, E., Pantani, L., Zamagni, E., Termini, R., Agboyi, E. Lakpo, Mancuso, K., Cifarelli, L., Rocchi, S., Rizzello, I., Tacchetti, P., Martinelli, G., Cavo, M., HemaSphere, PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY, Hematology
title PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_full PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_fullStr PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_full_unstemmed PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_short PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
title_sort ps1346 clonal evolution in multiple myeloma patients receiving maintenance therapy
title_unstemmed PS1346 CLONAL EVOLUTION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE THERAPY
topic Hematology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000563664.54177.1a