Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | The FASEB Journal |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
| In: | The FASEB Journal, 34, 2020, S1, S. 1-1 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Khalil, Md Imtiaz Singh, Vibha Benedetti, Arrigo De Khalil, Md Imtiaz Singh, Vibha Benedetti, Arrigo De |
|---|---|
| author |
Khalil, Md Imtiaz Singh, Vibha Benedetti, Arrigo De |
| spellingShingle |
Khalil, Md Imtiaz Singh, Vibha Benedetti, Arrigo De The FASEB Journal The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion Genetics Molecular Biology Biochemistry Biotechnology |
| author_sort |
khalil, md imtiaz |
| spelling |
Khalil, Md Imtiaz Singh, Vibha Benedetti, Arrigo De 0892-6638 1530-6860 Wiley Genetics Molecular Biology Biochemistry Biotechnology http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00330 <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the 2<jats:sup>nd</jats:sup> leading death‐causing malignancy in men where the majority of fatalities occur due to metastasis of cancer cells to adjacent and distal organs. Devising a therapeutic intervention requires the identification of underlying signaling pathways involved in the progression of PCa. We identified the novel interaction between two kinases that may initiate a signaling cascade promoting metastasis. One kinase is MAPK activated protein kinase 5 (MAPKAPK5 or MK5) which plays a debated role in cellular motility along with other cellular processes. Our observations are that MK5 interacts with another S/T kinase, called tousled like kinase 1 (TLK1), which may also have a potential role in cellular motility which is largely unstudied, apart from one report in breast cancer on TLK2. In PCa, TLK1‐MK5 signaling axis might be crucial as androgen deprivation therapy leads to increased expression of both TLK1 and MK5 in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer patients. Our working hypothesis is that <jats:bold>TLK1‐MK5 axis promotes PCa cell motility and invasion through actin rearrangement as well as focal adhesion proteins modification and disruption of this interaction may help to keep the tumor localized.</jats:bold></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method and Results</jats:title><jats:p>A previous protoarray interaction study from our lab identified MK5 as one of the novel interactors of TLK1 with high confidence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic><0.00005). To validate this interaction, we overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in HEK 293 cells and performed a reciprocal Co‐IP study targeting both TLK1 and EGFP‐MK5 that confirmed their interaction <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic>. Additionally, a reciprocal His‐ and GST‐pull down assays demonstrated the direct and physical interaction between TLK1 and MK5 <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic>. Another Co‐IP experiment revealed that TLK1‐MK5 interaction starts with the attachment of the cells to the ECM. We conducted several scratch wound repair assays to find out if TLK1‐MK5 axis enhances the migration rate of the cells. Inhibition of the kinase activity of TLK1 by using a specific inhibitor (thioridazine) decreases the migration rate of the HEK 293 cells, which supports the importance of TLK1 function in motility. Wound repair was also demonstrated to be faster in overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in LNCaP and MEF cells and compared also to MK5 knock out cells. An <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> Kinase assay using [y‐<jats:sup>32</jats:sup>P] ATP demonstrated that incubation of purified TLK1B and purified MK5 increases the phosphorylation of MK5, but not on TLK1B. Another <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> kinase assay using HSP27 as a substrate of MK5 revealed that TLK1B increases the kinase activity of MK5 towards HSP27 phosphorylation. Mass spectrometric analysis identified three unique phosphorylation sites in MK5 (S160, S354, S386) by TLK1B which are mapped to the kinase, NLS/NES and ERK3 binding domain of MK5. We also measured the protein level of several focal adhesion proteins in TLK1 and MK5 co‐expressed HEK 293 cells such as total FAK, phospho‐FAK (Tyr397), total Paxillin, Phospho‐Paxillin (Tyr118, Ser178), etc. and observed activating phosphorylation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Our data support that TLK1‐MK5 interaction is functionally involved in cell motility and migration and hence, disruption of this axis may inhibit the metastasis of PCa.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Support or Funding Information</jats:title><jats:p>DoD‐PCRP grant W81XWH‐17‐1‐0417</jats:p></jats:sec> The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion The FASEB Journal |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00330 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Biologie Chemie und Pharmazie Technik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5Ni9mYXNlYmouMjAyMC4zNC5zMS4wMDMzMA |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5Ni9mYXNlYmouMjAyMC4zNC5zMS4wMDMzMA |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2020 |
| issn |
0892-6638 1530-6860 |
| issn_str_mv |
0892-6638 1530-6860 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
khalil2020theimplicationsoftlk1mk5signalingaxisinprostatecancercellmotilityandinvasion |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
The FASEB Journal |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_unstemmed |
The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_full |
The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_fullStr |
The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_short |
The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_sort |
the implications of tlk1‐mk5 signaling axis in prostate cancer cell motility and invasion |
| topic |
Genetics Molecular Biology Biochemistry Biotechnology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00330 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| physical |
1-1 |
| description |
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the 2<jats:sup>nd</jats:sup> leading death‐causing malignancy in men where the majority of fatalities occur due to metastasis of cancer cells to adjacent and distal organs. Devising a therapeutic intervention requires the identification of underlying signaling pathways involved in the progression of PCa. We identified the novel interaction between two kinases that may initiate a signaling cascade promoting metastasis. One kinase is MAPK activated protein kinase 5 (MAPKAPK5 or MK5) which plays a debated role in cellular motility along with other cellular processes. Our observations are that MK5 interacts with another S/T kinase, called tousled like kinase 1 (TLK1), which may also have a potential role in cellular motility which is largely unstudied, apart from one report in breast cancer on TLK2. In PCa, TLK1‐MK5 signaling axis might be crucial as androgen deprivation therapy leads to increased expression of both TLK1 and MK5 in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer patients. Our working hypothesis is that <jats:bold>TLK1‐MK5 axis promotes PCa cell motility and invasion through actin rearrangement as well as focal adhesion proteins modification and disruption of this interaction may help to keep the tumor localized.</jats:bold></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method and Results</jats:title><jats:p>A previous protoarray interaction study from our lab identified MK5 as one of the novel interactors of TLK1 with high confidence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic><0.00005). To validate this interaction, we overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in HEK 293 cells and performed a reciprocal Co‐IP study targeting both TLK1 and EGFP‐MK5 that confirmed their interaction <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic>. Additionally, a reciprocal His‐ and GST‐pull down assays demonstrated the direct and physical interaction between TLK1 and MK5 <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic>. Another Co‐IP experiment revealed that TLK1‐MK5 interaction starts with the attachment of the cells to the ECM. We conducted several scratch wound repair assays to find out if TLK1‐MK5 axis enhances the migration rate of the cells. Inhibition of the kinase activity of TLK1 by using a specific inhibitor (thioridazine) decreases the migration rate of the HEK 293 cells, which supports the importance of TLK1 function in motility. Wound repair was also demonstrated to be faster in overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in LNCaP and MEF cells and compared also to MK5 knock out cells. An <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> Kinase assay using [y‐<jats:sup>32</jats:sup>P] ATP demonstrated that incubation of purified TLK1B and purified MK5 increases the phosphorylation of MK5, but not on TLK1B. Another <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> kinase assay using HSP27 as a substrate of MK5 revealed that TLK1B increases the kinase activity of MK5 towards HSP27 phosphorylation. Mass spectrometric analysis identified three unique phosphorylation sites in MK5 (S160, S354, S386) by TLK1B which are mapped to the kinase, NLS/NES and ERK3 binding domain of MK5. We also measured the protein level of several focal adhesion proteins in TLK1 and MK5 co‐expressed HEK 293 cells such as total FAK, phospho‐FAK (Tyr397), total Paxillin, Phospho‐Paxillin (Tyr118, Ser178), etc. and observed activating phosphorylation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Our data support that TLK1‐MK5 interaction is functionally involved in cell motility and migration and hence, disruption of this axis may inhibit the metastasis of PCa.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Support or Funding Information</jats:title><jats:p>DoD‐PCRP grant W81XWH‐17‐1‐0417</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
S1 |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| container_title |
The FASEB Journal |
| container_volume |
34 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792340717367984131 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:08:12.137Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+Implications+of+TLK1%E2%80%90MK5+Signaling+Axis+in+Prostate+Cancer+Cell+Motility+and+Invasion&rft.date=2020-04-01&genre=article&issn=1530-6860&volume=34&issue=S1&spage=1&epage=1&pages=1-1&jtitle=The+FASEB+Journal&atitle=The+Implications+of+TLK1%E2%80%90MK5+Signaling+Axis+in+Prostate+Cancer+Cell+Motility+and+Invasion&aulast=Benedetti&aufirst=Arrigo+De&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1096%2Ffasebj.2020.34.s1.00330&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792340717367984131 |
| author | Khalil, Md Imtiaz, Singh, Vibha, Benedetti, Arrigo De |
| author_facet | Khalil, Md Imtiaz, Singh, Vibha, Benedetti, Arrigo De, Khalil, Md Imtiaz, Singh, Vibha, Benedetti, Arrigo De |
| author_sort | khalil, md imtiaz |
| container_issue | S1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | The FASEB Journal |
| container_volume | 34 |
| description | <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the 2<jats:sup>nd</jats:sup> leading death‐causing malignancy in men where the majority of fatalities occur due to metastasis of cancer cells to adjacent and distal organs. Devising a therapeutic intervention requires the identification of underlying signaling pathways involved in the progression of PCa. We identified the novel interaction between two kinases that may initiate a signaling cascade promoting metastasis. One kinase is MAPK activated protein kinase 5 (MAPKAPK5 or MK5) which plays a debated role in cellular motility along with other cellular processes. Our observations are that MK5 interacts with another S/T kinase, called tousled like kinase 1 (TLK1), which may also have a potential role in cellular motility which is largely unstudied, apart from one report in breast cancer on TLK2. In PCa, TLK1‐MK5 signaling axis might be crucial as androgen deprivation therapy leads to increased expression of both TLK1 and MK5 in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer patients. Our working hypothesis is that <jats:bold>TLK1‐MK5 axis promotes PCa cell motility and invasion through actin rearrangement as well as focal adhesion proteins modification and disruption of this interaction may help to keep the tumor localized.</jats:bold></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method and Results</jats:title><jats:p>A previous protoarray interaction study from our lab identified MK5 as one of the novel interactors of TLK1 with high confidence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic><0.00005). To validate this interaction, we overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in HEK 293 cells and performed a reciprocal Co‐IP study targeting both TLK1 and EGFP‐MK5 that confirmed their interaction <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic>. Additionally, a reciprocal His‐ and GST‐pull down assays demonstrated the direct and physical interaction between TLK1 and MK5 <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic>. Another Co‐IP experiment revealed that TLK1‐MK5 interaction starts with the attachment of the cells to the ECM. We conducted several scratch wound repair assays to find out if TLK1‐MK5 axis enhances the migration rate of the cells. Inhibition of the kinase activity of TLK1 by using a specific inhibitor (thioridazine) decreases the migration rate of the HEK 293 cells, which supports the importance of TLK1 function in motility. Wound repair was also demonstrated to be faster in overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in LNCaP and MEF cells and compared also to MK5 knock out cells. An <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> Kinase assay using [y‐<jats:sup>32</jats:sup>P] ATP demonstrated that incubation of purified TLK1B and purified MK5 increases the phosphorylation of MK5, but not on TLK1B. Another <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> kinase assay using HSP27 as a substrate of MK5 revealed that TLK1B increases the kinase activity of MK5 towards HSP27 phosphorylation. Mass spectrometric analysis identified three unique phosphorylation sites in MK5 (S160, S354, S386) by TLK1B which are mapped to the kinase, NLS/NES and ERK3 binding domain of MK5. We also measured the protein level of several focal adhesion proteins in TLK1 and MK5 co‐expressed HEK 293 cells such as total FAK, phospho‐FAK (Tyr397), total Paxillin, Phospho‐Paxillin (Tyr118, Ser178), etc. and observed activating phosphorylation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Our data support that TLK1‐MK5 interaction is functionally involved in cell motility and migration and hence, disruption of this axis may inhibit the metastasis of PCa.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Support or Funding Information</jats:title><jats:p>DoD‐PCRP grant W81XWH‐17‐1‐0417</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00330 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Biologie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Technik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5Ni9mYXNlYmouMjAyMC4zNC5zMS4wMDMzMA |
| imprint | Wiley, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2020 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 0892-6638, 1530-6860 |
| issn_str_mv | 0892-6638, 1530-6860 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:08:12.137Z |
| match_str | khalil2020theimplicationsoftlk1mk5signalingaxisinprostatecancercellmotilityandinvasion |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 1-1 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | The FASEB Journal |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Khalil, Md Imtiaz Singh, Vibha Benedetti, Arrigo De 0892-6638 1530-6860 Wiley Genetics Molecular Biology Biochemistry Biotechnology http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00330 <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the 2<jats:sup>nd</jats:sup> leading death‐causing malignancy in men where the majority of fatalities occur due to metastasis of cancer cells to adjacent and distal organs. Devising a therapeutic intervention requires the identification of underlying signaling pathways involved in the progression of PCa. We identified the novel interaction between two kinases that may initiate a signaling cascade promoting metastasis. One kinase is MAPK activated protein kinase 5 (MAPKAPK5 or MK5) which plays a debated role in cellular motility along with other cellular processes. Our observations are that MK5 interacts with another S/T kinase, called tousled like kinase 1 (TLK1), which may also have a potential role in cellular motility which is largely unstudied, apart from one report in breast cancer on TLK2. In PCa, TLK1‐MK5 signaling axis might be crucial as androgen deprivation therapy leads to increased expression of both TLK1 and MK5 in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer patients. Our working hypothesis is that <jats:bold>TLK1‐MK5 axis promotes PCa cell motility and invasion through actin rearrangement as well as focal adhesion proteins modification and disruption of this interaction may help to keep the tumor localized.</jats:bold></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method and Results</jats:title><jats:p>A previous protoarray interaction study from our lab identified MK5 as one of the novel interactors of TLK1 with high confidence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic><0.00005). To validate this interaction, we overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in HEK 293 cells and performed a reciprocal Co‐IP study targeting both TLK1 and EGFP‐MK5 that confirmed their interaction <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic>. Additionally, a reciprocal His‐ and GST‐pull down assays demonstrated the direct and physical interaction between TLK1 and MK5 <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic>. Another Co‐IP experiment revealed that TLK1‐MK5 interaction starts with the attachment of the cells to the ECM. We conducted several scratch wound repair assays to find out if TLK1‐MK5 axis enhances the migration rate of the cells. Inhibition of the kinase activity of TLK1 by using a specific inhibitor (thioridazine) decreases the migration rate of the HEK 293 cells, which supports the importance of TLK1 function in motility. Wound repair was also demonstrated to be faster in overexpressed EGFP‐MK5 in LNCaP and MEF cells and compared also to MK5 knock out cells. An <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> Kinase assay using [y‐<jats:sup>32</jats:sup>P] ATP demonstrated that incubation of purified TLK1B and purified MK5 increases the phosphorylation of MK5, but not on TLK1B. Another <jats:italic>in‐vitro</jats:italic> kinase assay using HSP27 as a substrate of MK5 revealed that TLK1B increases the kinase activity of MK5 towards HSP27 phosphorylation. Mass spectrometric analysis identified three unique phosphorylation sites in MK5 (S160, S354, S386) by TLK1B which are mapped to the kinase, NLS/NES and ERK3 binding domain of MK5. We also measured the protein level of several focal adhesion proteins in TLK1 and MK5 co‐expressed HEK 293 cells such as total FAK, phospho‐FAK (Tyr397), total Paxillin, Phospho‐Paxillin (Tyr118, Ser178), etc. and observed activating phosphorylation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Our data support that TLK1‐MK5 interaction is functionally involved in cell motility and migration and hence, disruption of this axis may inhibit the metastasis of PCa.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Support or Funding Information</jats:title><jats:p>DoD‐PCRP grant W81XWH‐17‐1‐0417</jats:p></jats:sec> The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion The FASEB Journal |
| spellingShingle | Khalil, Md Imtiaz, Singh, Vibha, Benedetti, Arrigo De, The FASEB Journal, The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Biotechnology |
| title | The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_full | The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_fullStr | The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_short | The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| title_sort | the implications of tlk1‐mk5 signaling axis in prostate cancer cell motility and invasion |
| title_unstemmed | The Implications of TLK1‐MK5 Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion |
| topic | Genetics, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Biotechnology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00330 |