Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Free Speech and Cheap Talk
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Legal Analysis |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
In: | Journal of Legal Analysis, 11, 2019, S. 46-103 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Oxford University Press (OUP)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Hemel, Daniel Porat, Ariel Hemel, Daniel Porat, Ariel |
---|---|
author |
Hemel, Daniel Porat, Ariel |
spellingShingle |
Hemel, Daniel Porat, Ariel Journal of Legal Analysis Free Speech and Cheap Talk Law |
author_sort |
hemel, daniel |
spelling |
Hemel, Daniel Porat, Ariel 1946-5319 Oxford University Press (OUP) Law http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz004 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We present a new framework for analyzing defamation liability that serves both to clarify and complicate understandings of the law’s consequences for speakers, victims, and the marketplace of ideas. In addition to the familiar deterrence and chilling effects, we show how defamation liability can generate a “warming effect,” making statements more credible and potentially raising both the quality and quantity of speech. We also explain how a more plaintiff-friendly liability regime may exacerbate harms to defamation victims. We end by considering the possibility of “self-tailored” defamation law, with victims or speakers selecting the defamation liability regime that applies to them.</jats:p> Free Speech and Cheap Talk Journal of Legal Analysis |
doi_str_mv |
10.1093/jla/laz004 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Rechtswissenschaft |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9qbGEvbGF6MDA0 |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9qbGEvbGF6MDA0 |
institution |
DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 |
imprint |
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019 |
issn |
1946-5319 |
issn_str_mv |
1946-5319 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Oxford University Press (OUP) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
hemel2019freespeechandcheaptalk |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publisher |
Oxford University Press (OUP) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Journal of Legal Analysis |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_unstemmed |
Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_full |
Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_fullStr |
Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_full_unstemmed |
Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_short |
Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_sort |
free speech and cheap talk |
topic |
Law |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz004 |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
46-103 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>We present a new framework for analyzing defamation liability that serves both to clarify and complicate understandings of the law’s consequences for speakers, victims, and the marketplace of ideas. In addition to the familiar deterrence and chilling effects, we show how defamation liability can generate a “warming effect,” making statements more credible and potentially raising both the quality and quantity of speech. We also explain how a more plaintiff-friendly liability regime may exacerbate harms to defamation victims. We end by considering the possibility of “self-tailored” defamation law, with victims or speakers selecting the defamation liability regime that applies to them.</jats:p> |
container_start_page |
46 |
container_title |
Journal of Legal Analysis |
container_volume |
11 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792336728778866698 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:05:04.091Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Free+Speech+and+Cheap+Talk&rft.date=2019-01-01&genre=article&issn=1946-5319&volume=11&spage=46&epage=103&pages=46-103&jtitle=Journal+of+Legal+Analysis&atitle=Free+Speech+and+Cheap+Talk&aulast=Porat&aufirst=Ariel&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1093%2Fjla%2Flaz004&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792336728778866698 |
author | Hemel, Daniel, Porat, Ariel |
author_facet | Hemel, Daniel, Porat, Ariel, Hemel, Daniel, Porat, Ariel |
author_sort | hemel, daniel |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | Journal of Legal Analysis |
container_volume | 11 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We present a new framework for analyzing defamation liability that serves both to clarify and complicate understandings of the law’s consequences for speakers, victims, and the marketplace of ideas. In addition to the familiar deterrence and chilling effects, we show how defamation liability can generate a “warming effect,” making statements more credible and potentially raising both the quality and quantity of speech. We also explain how a more plaintiff-friendly liability regime may exacerbate harms to defamation victims. We end by considering the possibility of “self-tailored” defamation law, with victims or speakers selecting the defamation liability regime that applies to them.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jla/laz004 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9qbGEvbGF6MDA0 |
imprint | Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019 |
imprint_str_mv | Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019 |
institution | DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14 |
issn | 1946-5319 |
issn_str_mv | 1946-5319 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:05:04.091Z |
match_str | hemel2019freespeechandcheaptalk |
mega_collection | Oxford University Press (OUP) (CrossRef) |
physical | 46-103 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Journal of Legal Analysis |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Hemel, Daniel Porat, Ariel 1946-5319 Oxford University Press (OUP) Law http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz004 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We present a new framework for analyzing defamation liability that serves both to clarify and complicate understandings of the law’s consequences for speakers, victims, and the marketplace of ideas. In addition to the familiar deterrence and chilling effects, we show how defamation liability can generate a “warming effect,” making statements more credible and potentially raising both the quality and quantity of speech. We also explain how a more plaintiff-friendly liability regime may exacerbate harms to defamation victims. We end by considering the possibility of “self-tailored” defamation law, with victims or speakers selecting the defamation liability regime that applies to them.</jats:p> Free Speech and Cheap Talk Journal of Legal Analysis |
spellingShingle | Hemel, Daniel, Porat, Ariel, Journal of Legal Analysis, Free Speech and Cheap Talk, Law |
title | Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_full | Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_fullStr | Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_full_unstemmed | Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_short | Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
title_sort | free speech and cheap talk |
title_unstemmed | Free Speech and Cheap Talk |
topic | Law |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz004 |