author_facet Dewhurst, Elaine
Dewhurst, Elaine
author Dewhurst, Elaine
spellingShingle Dewhurst, Elaine
Industrial Law Journal
Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
Law
author_sort dewhurst, elaine
spelling Dewhurst, Elaine 1464-3669 0305-9332 Oxford University Press (OUP) Law http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww004 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The difficult task facing national court judges in assessing the proportionality of mandatory retirement measures in age discrimination cases should not be underestimated. Such assessments often require judges to immerse themselves in history, science, economics, sociology and even psychology in answering this difficult question. The lack of guidance from the European Union level adds to the complexity of this task. This article provides a guiding model for the assessment of such cases at a national level which involves an analysis of four specific factors: the specific economic sector, the availability of a pension, the impact of the mandatory retirement measure on the right to work and earn a livelihood and the importance of consent to the measure. The article also addresses what appears to be a fifth factor in the case law of the courts of England and Wales: the particular age chosen, although the necessity and current interpretation of this factor is challenged. The article provides a foundational model for future cases involving mandatory retirement measures which will assist in reducing fragmentation and inconsistency of decision making, provide more certainty and clarity for both claimants and respondents as to the legality of such provisions and reduce the potential for the inevitable undermining of the age discrimination rules which currently exists.</jats:p> Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases Industrial Law Journal
doi_str_mv 10.1093/indlaw/dww004
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Rechtswissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9pbmRsYXcvZHd3MDA0
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9pbmRsYXcvZHd3MDA0
institution DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
imprint Oxford University Press (OUP), 2016
imprint_str_mv Oxford University Press (OUP), 2016
issn 1464-3669
0305-9332
issn_str_mv 1464-3669
0305-9332
language English
mega_collection Oxford University Press (OUP) (CrossRef)
match_str dewhurst2016proportionalityassessmentsofmandatoryretirementmeasuresuncoveringguidancefornationalcourtsinagediscriminationcases
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Industrial Law Journal
source_id 49
title Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_unstemmed Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_full Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_fullStr Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_full_unstemmed Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_short Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_sort proportionality assessments of mandatory retirement measures: uncovering guidance for national courts in age discrimination cases
topic Law
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww004
publishDate 2016
physical 60-88
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The difficult task facing national court judges in assessing the proportionality of mandatory retirement measures in age discrimination cases should not be underestimated. Such assessments often require judges to immerse themselves in history, science, economics, sociology and even psychology in answering this difficult question. The lack of guidance from the European Union level adds to the complexity of this task. This article provides a guiding model for the assessment of such cases at a national level which involves an analysis of four specific factors: the specific economic sector, the availability of a pension, the impact of the mandatory retirement measure on the right to work and earn a livelihood and the importance of consent to the measure. The article also addresses what appears to be a fifth factor in the case law of the courts of England and Wales: the particular age chosen, although the necessity and current interpretation of this factor is challenged. The article provides a foundational model for future cases involving mandatory retirement measures which will assist in reducing fragmentation and inconsistency of decision making, provide more certainty and clarity for both claimants and respondents as to the legality of such provisions and reduce the potential for the inevitable undermining of the age discrimination rules which currently exists.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Industrial Law Journal
container_volume 45
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792339219210829829
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:44:38.978Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Proportionality+Assessments+of+Mandatory+Retirement+Measures%3A+Uncovering+Guidance+for+National+Courts+in+Age+Discrimination+Cases&rft.date=2016-03-01&genre=article&issn=0305-9332&volume=45&issue=1&spage=60&epage=88&pages=60-88&jtitle=Industrial+Law+Journal&atitle=Proportionality+Assessments+of+Mandatory+Retirement+Measures%3A+Uncovering+Guidance+for+National+Courts+in+Age+Discrimination+Cases&aulast=Dewhurst&aufirst=Elaine&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1093%2Findlaw%2Fdww004&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792339219210829829
author Dewhurst, Elaine
author_facet Dewhurst, Elaine, Dewhurst, Elaine
author_sort dewhurst, elaine
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Industrial Law Journal
container_volume 45
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The difficult task facing national court judges in assessing the proportionality of mandatory retirement measures in age discrimination cases should not be underestimated. Such assessments often require judges to immerse themselves in history, science, economics, sociology and even psychology in answering this difficult question. The lack of guidance from the European Union level adds to the complexity of this task. This article provides a guiding model for the assessment of such cases at a national level which involves an analysis of four specific factors: the specific economic sector, the availability of a pension, the impact of the mandatory retirement measure on the right to work and earn a livelihood and the importance of consent to the measure. The article also addresses what appears to be a fifth factor in the case law of the courts of England and Wales: the particular age chosen, although the necessity and current interpretation of this factor is challenged. The article provides a foundational model for future cases involving mandatory retirement measures which will assist in reducing fragmentation and inconsistency of decision making, provide more certainty and clarity for both claimants and respondents as to the legality of such provisions and reduce the potential for the inevitable undermining of the age discrimination rules which currently exists.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1093/indlaw/dww004
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Rechtswissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9pbmRsYXcvZHd3MDA0
imprint Oxford University Press (OUP), 2016
imprint_str_mv Oxford University Press (OUP), 2016
institution DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4
issn 1464-3669, 0305-9332
issn_str_mv 1464-3669, 0305-9332
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:44:38.978Z
match_str dewhurst2016proportionalityassessmentsofmandatoryretirementmeasuresuncoveringguidancefornationalcourtsinagediscriminationcases
mega_collection Oxford University Press (OUP) (CrossRef)
physical 60-88
publishDate 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Industrial Law Journal
source_id 49
spelling Dewhurst, Elaine 1464-3669 0305-9332 Oxford University Press (OUP) Law http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww004 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The difficult task facing national court judges in assessing the proportionality of mandatory retirement measures in age discrimination cases should not be underestimated. Such assessments often require judges to immerse themselves in history, science, economics, sociology and even psychology in answering this difficult question. The lack of guidance from the European Union level adds to the complexity of this task. This article provides a guiding model for the assessment of such cases at a national level which involves an analysis of four specific factors: the specific economic sector, the availability of a pension, the impact of the mandatory retirement measure on the right to work and earn a livelihood and the importance of consent to the measure. The article also addresses what appears to be a fifth factor in the case law of the courts of England and Wales: the particular age chosen, although the necessity and current interpretation of this factor is challenged. The article provides a foundational model for future cases involving mandatory retirement measures which will assist in reducing fragmentation and inconsistency of decision making, provide more certainty and clarity for both claimants and respondents as to the legality of such provisions and reduce the potential for the inevitable undermining of the age discrimination rules which currently exists.</jats:p> Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases Industrial Law Journal
spellingShingle Dewhurst, Elaine, Industrial Law Journal, Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases, Law
title Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_full Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_fullStr Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_full_unstemmed Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_short Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
title_sort proportionality assessments of mandatory retirement measures: uncovering guidance for national courts in age discrimination cases
title_unstemmed Proportionality Assessments of Mandatory Retirement Measures: Uncovering Guidance for National Courts in Age Discrimination Cases
topic Law
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww004