author_facet Komiyama, C
Kodama, T
Komiyama, C
Kodama, T
author Komiyama, C
Kodama, T
spellingShingle Komiyama, C
Kodama, T
European Heart Journal
P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
author_sort komiyama, c
spelling Komiyama, C Kodama, T 0195-668X 1522-9645 Oxford University Press (OUP) Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.024 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The technology of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has dramatically advanced and now patients can get various treatment options for left main trunk (LMT) lesion. On the other hand, Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA) has appeared again on the stage of PCI as a technique of debulking plaques. Purpose of this study was to compare procedural and mid-term outcomes between DCA and conventional stenting for LMT related lesions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We extracted cases treated with PCI for LMT related lesion and retrospectively examined backgrounds of patients, postprocedural events and whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) had been stopped or not. In order to rule out selection bias, conventional stenting cases were collected in the era prior to starting DCA treatment. In this study, we defined Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) as cardiovascular death, restenosis in the target lesions and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>From April, 2014 to September, 2017, consecutive 85 patients underwent LMT stenting. Fifty-four patients enrolled in the non-DCA group excluding patients post CABG, treated with rotablator, with ACS and unexpected incidental LMT stenting. From May, 2016 to September, 2018, consecutive 26 cases underwent DCA (DCA group), in whom 15 cases were treated with the Drug Coating Balloon (DCB) subsequent DCA. The purposes of DCA were to avoid LMT stent or stent to other lesions and plaque reduction. In terms of patient’s characteristics, there was no significant difference in sex, BMI, coronary risk factors. Renal function was significantly better in DCA group than non-DCA group (eGFR 69.0 vs 59.5 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.028), and the amount of contrast medium used (124 vs 94 ml; p = 0.003) and duration of fluoroscopy time (47.7 vs 35.8 minutes; p = 0.007) were significantly greater in the DCA group than non-DCA group. However, there was no significant difference in incidence of periprocedural complications (0 vs 7 cases, p = 0.09), all cause of death (0 vs 8(14.8%); p = 0.161(Log-Rank)) and MACE (2(7.7%) vs 11(20.1%); p = 0.261(Log-Rank)) between the two groups. In addition, DAPT had been significantly stopped earlier in DCA group than non-DCA group (9(36%) vs 13(24.1%) cases; &amp;lt;0.0001(Log-Rank))(Figure).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>LMT stenting has a high risk for the fatal event in case of in-stent-restenosis and it makes difficult to stop DAPT in any case even at other surgical treatments. The appropriate plaque debulking by DCA can avoid deploying stents in LMT, shorten stent length and shorten DAPT duration. Hence, DCA is very effective for patients ahead of other surgeries. Although the procedure with DCA needs more contrast medium and longer fluoroscopy time, DCA will be a good option for treatment in LMT related lesion for appropriate cases. New DCA might be useful and safe enough for treating LMT related lesion. DCB may also contribute to the improvement of outcomes in treatment with DCA.</jats:p> <jats:p>Abstract P19 Figure</jats:p> </jats:sec> P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience European Heart Journal
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.024
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9laGpjaS9laHo4NzIuMDI0
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9laGpjaS9laHo4NzIuMDI0
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020
imprint_str_mv Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
issn_str_mv 0195-668X
1522-9645
language English
mega_collection Oxford University Press (OUP) (CrossRef)
match_str komiyama2020p19midtermresultsofcoronaryinterventionwithdirectionalcoronaryatherectomycomparedwithconventionalstentingforlmtrelatedlesionasinglecenterexperience
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series European Heart Journal
source_id 49
title P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_unstemmed P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_full P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_fullStr P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_short P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_sort p19 mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for lmt related lesion - a single center experience
topic Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.024
publishDate 2020
physical
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The technology of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has dramatically advanced and now patients can get various treatment options for left main trunk (LMT) lesion. On the other hand, Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA) has appeared again on the stage of PCI as a technique of debulking plaques. Purpose of this study was to compare procedural and mid-term outcomes between DCA and conventional stenting for LMT related lesions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We extracted cases treated with PCI for LMT related lesion and retrospectively examined backgrounds of patients, postprocedural events and whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) had been stopped or not. In order to rule out selection bias, conventional stenting cases were collected in the era prior to starting DCA treatment. In this study, we defined Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) as cardiovascular death, restenosis in the target lesions and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>From April, 2014 to September, 2017, consecutive 85 patients underwent LMT stenting. Fifty-four patients enrolled in the non-DCA group excluding patients post CABG, treated with rotablator, with ACS and unexpected incidental LMT stenting. From May, 2016 to September, 2018, consecutive 26 cases underwent DCA (DCA group), in whom 15 cases were treated with the Drug Coating Balloon (DCB) subsequent DCA. The purposes of DCA were to avoid LMT stent or stent to other lesions and plaque reduction. In terms of patient’s characteristics, there was no significant difference in sex, BMI, coronary risk factors. Renal function was significantly better in DCA group than non-DCA group (eGFR 69.0 vs 59.5 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.028), and the amount of contrast medium used (124 vs 94 ml; p = 0.003) and duration of fluoroscopy time (47.7 vs 35.8 minutes; p = 0.007) were significantly greater in the DCA group than non-DCA group. However, there was no significant difference in incidence of periprocedural complications (0 vs 7 cases, p = 0.09), all cause of death (0 vs 8(14.8%); p = 0.161(Log-Rank)) and MACE (2(7.7%) vs 11(20.1%); p = 0.261(Log-Rank)) between the two groups. In addition, DAPT had been significantly stopped earlier in DCA group than non-DCA group (9(36%) vs 13(24.1%) cases; &amp;lt;0.0001(Log-Rank))(Figure).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>LMT stenting has a high risk for the fatal event in case of in-stent-restenosis and it makes difficult to stop DAPT in any case even at other surgical treatments. The appropriate plaque debulking by DCA can avoid deploying stents in LMT, shorten stent length and shorten DAPT duration. Hence, DCA is very effective for patients ahead of other surgeries. Although the procedure with DCA needs more contrast medium and longer fluoroscopy time, DCA will be a good option for treatment in LMT related lesion for appropriate cases. New DCA might be useful and safe enough for treating LMT related lesion. DCB may also contribute to the improvement of outcomes in treatment with DCA.</jats:p> <jats:p>Abstract P19 Figure</jats:p> </jats:sec>
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 0
container_title European Heart Journal
container_volume 41
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792325586620776459
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:07:58.596Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=P19+Mid-term+results+of+coronary+intervention+with+directional+coronary+atherectomy+compared+with+conventional+stenting+for+LMT+related+lesion+-+a+single+center+experience&rft.date=2020-01-01&genre=article&issn=1522-9645&volume=41&issue=Supplement_1&jtitle=European+Heart+Journal&atitle=P19+Mid-term+results+of+coronary+intervention+with+directional+coronary+atherectomy+compared+with+conventional+stenting+for+LMT+related+lesion+-+a+single+center+experience&aulast=Kodama&aufirst=T&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1093%2Fehjci%2Fehz872.024&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792325586620776459
author Komiyama, C, Kodama, T
author_facet Komiyama, C, Kodama, T, Komiyama, C, Kodama, T
author_sort komiyama, c
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 0
container_title European Heart Journal
container_volume 41
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The technology of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has dramatically advanced and now patients can get various treatment options for left main trunk (LMT) lesion. On the other hand, Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA) has appeared again on the stage of PCI as a technique of debulking plaques. Purpose of this study was to compare procedural and mid-term outcomes between DCA and conventional stenting for LMT related lesions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We extracted cases treated with PCI for LMT related lesion and retrospectively examined backgrounds of patients, postprocedural events and whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) had been stopped or not. In order to rule out selection bias, conventional stenting cases were collected in the era prior to starting DCA treatment. In this study, we defined Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) as cardiovascular death, restenosis in the target lesions and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>From April, 2014 to September, 2017, consecutive 85 patients underwent LMT stenting. Fifty-four patients enrolled in the non-DCA group excluding patients post CABG, treated with rotablator, with ACS and unexpected incidental LMT stenting. From May, 2016 to September, 2018, consecutive 26 cases underwent DCA (DCA group), in whom 15 cases were treated with the Drug Coating Balloon (DCB) subsequent DCA. The purposes of DCA were to avoid LMT stent or stent to other lesions and plaque reduction. In terms of patient’s characteristics, there was no significant difference in sex, BMI, coronary risk factors. Renal function was significantly better in DCA group than non-DCA group (eGFR 69.0 vs 59.5 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.028), and the amount of contrast medium used (124 vs 94 ml; p = 0.003) and duration of fluoroscopy time (47.7 vs 35.8 minutes; p = 0.007) were significantly greater in the DCA group than non-DCA group. However, there was no significant difference in incidence of periprocedural complications (0 vs 7 cases, p = 0.09), all cause of death (0 vs 8(14.8%); p = 0.161(Log-Rank)) and MACE (2(7.7%) vs 11(20.1%); p = 0.261(Log-Rank)) between the two groups. In addition, DAPT had been significantly stopped earlier in DCA group than non-DCA group (9(36%) vs 13(24.1%) cases; &amp;lt;0.0001(Log-Rank))(Figure).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>LMT stenting has a high risk for the fatal event in case of in-stent-restenosis and it makes difficult to stop DAPT in any case even at other surgical treatments. The appropriate plaque debulking by DCA can avoid deploying stents in LMT, shorten stent length and shorten DAPT duration. Hence, DCA is very effective for patients ahead of other surgeries. Although the procedure with DCA needs more contrast medium and longer fluoroscopy time, DCA will be a good option for treatment in LMT related lesion for appropriate cases. New DCA might be useful and safe enough for treating LMT related lesion. DCB may also contribute to the improvement of outcomes in treatment with DCA.</jats:p> <jats:p>Abstract P19 Figure</jats:p> </jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.024
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA5My9laGpjaS9laHo4NzIuMDI0
imprint Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020
imprint_str_mv Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0195-668X, 1522-9645
issn_str_mv 0195-668X, 1522-9645
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:07:58.596Z
match_str komiyama2020p19midtermresultsofcoronaryinterventionwithdirectionalcoronaryatherectomycomparedwithconventionalstentingforlmtrelatedlesionasinglecenterexperience
mega_collection Oxford University Press (OUP) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series European Heart Journal
source_id 49
spelling Komiyama, C Kodama, T 0195-668X 1522-9645 Oxford University Press (OUP) Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.024 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The technology of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has dramatically advanced and now patients can get various treatment options for left main trunk (LMT) lesion. On the other hand, Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA) has appeared again on the stage of PCI as a technique of debulking plaques. Purpose of this study was to compare procedural and mid-term outcomes between DCA and conventional stenting for LMT related lesions. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We extracted cases treated with PCI for LMT related lesion and retrospectively examined backgrounds of patients, postprocedural events and whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) had been stopped or not. In order to rule out selection bias, conventional stenting cases were collected in the era prior to starting DCA treatment. In this study, we defined Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) as cardiovascular death, restenosis in the target lesions and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>From April, 2014 to September, 2017, consecutive 85 patients underwent LMT stenting. Fifty-four patients enrolled in the non-DCA group excluding patients post CABG, treated with rotablator, with ACS and unexpected incidental LMT stenting. From May, 2016 to September, 2018, consecutive 26 cases underwent DCA (DCA group), in whom 15 cases were treated with the Drug Coating Balloon (DCB) subsequent DCA. The purposes of DCA were to avoid LMT stent or stent to other lesions and plaque reduction. In terms of patient’s characteristics, there was no significant difference in sex, BMI, coronary risk factors. Renal function was significantly better in DCA group than non-DCA group (eGFR 69.0 vs 59.5 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.028), and the amount of contrast medium used (124 vs 94 ml; p = 0.003) and duration of fluoroscopy time (47.7 vs 35.8 minutes; p = 0.007) were significantly greater in the DCA group than non-DCA group. However, there was no significant difference in incidence of periprocedural complications (0 vs 7 cases, p = 0.09), all cause of death (0 vs 8(14.8%); p = 0.161(Log-Rank)) and MACE (2(7.7%) vs 11(20.1%); p = 0.261(Log-Rank)) between the two groups. In addition, DAPT had been significantly stopped earlier in DCA group than non-DCA group (9(36%) vs 13(24.1%) cases; &amp;lt;0.0001(Log-Rank))(Figure).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>LMT stenting has a high risk for the fatal event in case of in-stent-restenosis and it makes difficult to stop DAPT in any case even at other surgical treatments. The appropriate plaque debulking by DCA can avoid deploying stents in LMT, shorten stent length and shorten DAPT duration. Hence, DCA is very effective for patients ahead of other surgeries. Although the procedure with DCA needs more contrast medium and longer fluoroscopy time, DCA will be a good option for treatment in LMT related lesion for appropriate cases. New DCA might be useful and safe enough for treating LMT related lesion. DCB may also contribute to the improvement of outcomes in treatment with DCA.</jats:p> <jats:p>Abstract P19 Figure</jats:p> </jats:sec> P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience European Heart Journal
spellingShingle Komiyama, C, Kodama, T, European Heart Journal, P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
title P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_full P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_fullStr P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_short P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
title_sort p19 mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for lmt related lesion - a single center experience
title_unstemmed P19 Mid-term results of coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional stenting for LMT related lesion - a single center experience
topic Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.024