author_facet Goris, Annelies H. C.
Meijer, Erwin P.
Westerterp, Klaas R.
Goris, Annelies H. C.
Meijer, Erwin P.
Westerterp, Klaas R.
author Goris, Annelies H. C.
Meijer, Erwin P.
Westerterp, Klaas R.
spellingShingle Goris, Annelies H. C.
Meijer, Erwin P.
Westerterp, Klaas R.
British Journal of Nutrition
Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
Nutrition and Dietetics
Medicine (miscellaneous)
author_sort goris, annelies h. c.
spelling Goris, Annelies H. C. Meijer, Erwin P. Westerterp, Klaas R. 0007-1145 1475-2662 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001322 <jats:p>The aim of the current study was to measure differences in reporting behaviour between a first occasion of 7 d food recording and a second occasion of 7 d food recording 12 weeks later, in a group of elderly men (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17) and women (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17). Half the group followed an exercise intervention. The mean age was 61 (SD 5) YEARS AND MEAN BMI WAS 26.2 (sd 3.8) kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>. Reported energy intake was compared with energy expenditure as calculated from measured BMR and physical activity assessed with a tri-axial accelerometer for movement registration. Total under-reporting was divided into undereating and under-recording. Undereating was calculated from the change in body mass over the recording week and the under-recording was measured using the water balance technique. In the first period, the total under-reporting was 21 % and increased to 27 % in the second period (P=0.03). In the first period there was no indication for subjects eating less during the recording week, however, in the second period subjects lost body mass during the food recording indicating undereating. The amount of under-recording was calculated at 21 % in the first period and 18 % in the second period of recording (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>0.28). During the second period subjects selectively under-reported their fat intake and over-reported their protein intake. In conclusion, repeated assessment of food intake caused a higher quantitative and a qualitative under-reporting of food intake. The effect of interventions (dietary or otherwise) on habitual food intake might be confounded by changes in food-reporting behaviour.</jats:p> Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting British Journal of Nutrition
doi_str_mv 10.1079/bjn2001322
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA3OS9iam4yMDAxMzIy
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA3OS9iam4yMDAxMzIy
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2001
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2001
issn 0007-1145
1475-2662
issn_str_mv 0007-1145
1475-2662
language English
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
match_str goris2001repeatedmeasurementofhabitualfoodintakeincreasesunderreportingandinducesselectiveunderreporting
publishDateSort 2001
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series British Journal of Nutrition
source_id 49
title Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_unstemmed Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_full Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_fullStr Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_full_unstemmed Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_short Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_sort repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
topic Nutrition and Dietetics
Medicine (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001322
publishDate 2001
physical 629-634
description <jats:p>The aim of the current study was to measure differences in reporting behaviour between a first occasion of 7 d food recording and a second occasion of 7 d food recording 12 weeks later, in a group of elderly men (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17) and women (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17). Half the group followed an exercise intervention. The mean age was 61 (SD 5) YEARS AND MEAN BMI WAS 26.2 (sd 3.8) kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>. Reported energy intake was compared with energy expenditure as calculated from measured BMR and physical activity assessed with a tri-axial accelerometer for movement registration. Total under-reporting was divided into undereating and under-recording. Undereating was calculated from the change in body mass over the recording week and the under-recording was measured using the water balance technique. In the first period, the total under-reporting was 21 % and increased to 27 % in the second period (P=0.03). In the first period there was no indication for subjects eating less during the recording week, however, in the second period subjects lost body mass during the food recording indicating undereating. The amount of under-recording was calculated at 21 % in the first period and 18 % in the second period of recording (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>0.28). During the second period subjects selectively under-reported their fat intake and over-reported their protein intake. In conclusion, repeated assessment of food intake caused a higher quantitative and a qualitative under-reporting of food intake. The effect of interventions (dietary or otherwise) on habitual food intake might be confounded by changes in food-reporting behaviour.</jats:p>
container_issue 5
container_start_page 629
container_title British Journal of Nutrition
container_volume 85
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792337742081818629
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:20:56.096Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Repeated+measurement+of+habitual+food+intake+increases+under-reporting+and+induces+selective+under-reporting&rft.date=2001-05-01&genre=article&issn=1475-2662&volume=85&issue=5&spage=629&epage=634&pages=629-634&jtitle=British+Journal+of+Nutrition&atitle=Repeated+measurement+of+habitual+food+intake+increases+under-reporting+and+induces+selective+under-reporting&aulast=Westerterp&aufirst=Klaas+R.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1079%2Fbjn2001322&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792337742081818629
author Goris, Annelies H. C., Meijer, Erwin P., Westerterp, Klaas R.
author_facet Goris, Annelies H. C., Meijer, Erwin P., Westerterp, Klaas R., Goris, Annelies H. C., Meijer, Erwin P., Westerterp, Klaas R.
author_sort goris, annelies h. c.
container_issue 5
container_start_page 629
container_title British Journal of Nutrition
container_volume 85
description <jats:p>The aim of the current study was to measure differences in reporting behaviour between a first occasion of 7 d food recording and a second occasion of 7 d food recording 12 weeks later, in a group of elderly men (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17) and women (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17). Half the group followed an exercise intervention. The mean age was 61 (SD 5) YEARS AND MEAN BMI WAS 26.2 (sd 3.8) kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>. Reported energy intake was compared with energy expenditure as calculated from measured BMR and physical activity assessed with a tri-axial accelerometer for movement registration. Total under-reporting was divided into undereating and under-recording. Undereating was calculated from the change in body mass over the recording week and the under-recording was measured using the water balance technique. In the first period, the total under-reporting was 21 % and increased to 27 % in the second period (P=0.03). In the first period there was no indication for subjects eating less during the recording week, however, in the second period subjects lost body mass during the food recording indicating undereating. The amount of under-recording was calculated at 21 % in the first period and 18 % in the second period of recording (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>0.28). During the second period subjects selectively under-reported their fat intake and over-reported their protein intake. In conclusion, repeated assessment of food intake caused a higher quantitative and a qualitative under-reporting of food intake. The effect of interventions (dietary or otherwise) on habitual food intake might be confounded by changes in food-reporting behaviour.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1079/bjn2001322
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA3OS9iam4yMDAxMzIy
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2001
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2001
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0007-1145, 1475-2662
issn_str_mv 0007-1145, 1475-2662
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:20:56.096Z
match_str goris2001repeatedmeasurementofhabitualfoodintakeincreasesunderreportingandinducesselectiveunderreporting
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
physical 629-634
publishDate 2001
publishDateSort 2001
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series British Journal of Nutrition
source_id 49
spelling Goris, Annelies H. C. Meijer, Erwin P. Westerterp, Klaas R. 0007-1145 1475-2662 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001322 <jats:p>The aim of the current study was to measure differences in reporting behaviour between a first occasion of 7 d food recording and a second occasion of 7 d food recording 12 weeks later, in a group of elderly men (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17) and women (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>17). Half the group followed an exercise intervention. The mean age was 61 (SD 5) YEARS AND MEAN BMI WAS 26.2 (sd 3.8) kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>. Reported energy intake was compared with energy expenditure as calculated from measured BMR and physical activity assessed with a tri-axial accelerometer for movement registration. Total under-reporting was divided into undereating and under-recording. Undereating was calculated from the change in body mass over the recording week and the under-recording was measured using the water balance technique. In the first period, the total under-reporting was 21 % and increased to 27 % in the second period (P=0.03). In the first period there was no indication for subjects eating less during the recording week, however, in the second period subjects lost body mass during the food recording indicating undereating. The amount of under-recording was calculated at 21 % in the first period and 18 % in the second period of recording (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>0.28). During the second period subjects selectively under-reported their fat intake and over-reported their protein intake. In conclusion, repeated assessment of food intake caused a higher quantitative and a qualitative under-reporting of food intake. The effect of interventions (dietary or otherwise) on habitual food intake might be confounded by changes in food-reporting behaviour.</jats:p> Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting British Journal of Nutrition
spellingShingle Goris, Annelies H. C., Meijer, Erwin P., Westerterp, Klaas R., British Journal of Nutrition, Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting, Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous)
title Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_full Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_fullStr Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_full_unstemmed Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_short Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_sort repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
title_unstemmed Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting
topic Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001322